America's Corrupt and Discriminating Judicial System Against Black, Hispanic, Female, and Low Income Americans

Anthony Johnson

• Publisher: Page Publishing, Inc.
• Year: 2017
• Print ISBN: 9781682894262
• eBook ISBN: 9781682894279
• Topic: Social Sciences
• Subtopic: Discrimination & Race Relations
• Index: Social Sciences

America's Corrupt and Discriminating Judicial System Against Black, Hispanic, Female, and Low Income Americans, is designed for the common people to compete with America's corrupt Judicial System, and win or alleviate lost! e novel exposes several illegal exploitation of said minority groups by the very institution, who swore to protect their rights! e novel pinpoints their systematic tricks and lies; so that laypersons can actually compete in round if the novel's instructions are followed. If you're lazy or scared of the Judicial System, they will continue to victimize you and get paid as this novel establishes. is novel is designed for free Americans who are willing to fight!

Part I

Procedures

Chapter 1

Historical Facts

Article III of the Constitution of United States, section 1: the judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior and shall, at stated times, receive for their services a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. Further, Title 28 United States Codes Annotated, section 453, is the statutory oath that all judges take declaring that they will not discriminate—to wit: each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ________________, do solemnly swear [or affirm] that I will administer justice without respect to persons and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.” The foregoing provisions of the Constitution of the United States and relating statutory laws have been systematically abused since their enactments and continue to this very day, by predominantly white male judges and their constituency in every state of the Union.

The abuse could not be possible without the assistance of people mentioned in article I (executive: law enforcement branch of the Constitution of the United States) and article II (legislative: lawmaking branch of the Constitution of the United States). All three branches of the government constitutes one single entity and are interdependent with each other; in summary, America’s governing hypocrisy is that the Constitution of the United States of America is designed to create liberty, equality, and justice for all American citizens and promote governmental interest while simultaneously avoiding governmental tyranny through each of the said articles balancing each other, so that no part of American government could become tyrannical. However, the judicial branch has discovered a way to defeat this purpose. Though the American form of government does work if not exploited, unfortunately this is not the case—they exploit.1

What continues to this very day is judicial tyranny in many of America’s courthouses. Predominantly white male judges at all levels of jurisdictions, state, federal, and supreme, have produced some of the most vicious liars in legal history that ever donned a black robe! The American judiciary systematically employs a variety of artifices with the purpose of denying a specific class of Americans (a judicially created inconspicuous underclass) their guaranteed constitutional rights while simultaneously promoting the interest of the predominantly white male judicial or governmental system, which also simultaneously promotes mostly white and affluent Americans’ interest in general, both politically and financially throughout the entire country.

This practice by the American judiciary is a common practice by many judges; however, it is difficult to detect because it is done in a very sneaky and subverted manner, through pretentious legal actions. Since the demise of the American Indian, the institution of slavery, and the secondary citizenship of the American woman, America’s judicial branch of government has developed one artifice after another purposely designed to undercut or deny guaranteed constitutional protections of said minority groups. For example, after the demise of the American Indian and confiscation of their lands, the American government entered into many treaties (a legal and honorable agreement between two parties submitted under oath). Eventually all treaties were broken by the American government and the American Indian was relegated to reservations (slow death and watch camps), but more to the point is, why were the treaties broken? The simple answer is, to promote white and affluent Americans’ interest. Consequently, America’s judicial system has always found or created some legal loophole to justify the treaties’ breach.

Black Americans were freed from slavery by, among other things, the Emancipation Proclamation (an edict issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, freeing the slaves for strictly political reasons) and the institution of slavery legally abolished by the Bill of Rights, Amendment Thirteen of the Constitution of the United States, in 1865.

However, since the said times and up until the present time, and despite the institution of the bill of rights and civil rights to protect all American citizens, America’s judicial system has diabolically and systematically undercut or literally eliminated the use of these basic rights to all Americans, to ensure that the predominantly white male government officials remain that way, as is evident!

The American woman has also been systematically victimized by the American judicial system. At one time the American woman could not vote, sit as jurors, or practice law. Eventually these ideologies were abolished from America’s judicial and political machinery, but not without opposition. And today America’s judiciary employs more subtle means of “keeping women in their places.” Women are now victims of sexual harassment, job discrimination, and domestic violence, and their redress to America’s judicial system is severely limited, except if the woman is rich or the court has a personal interest.

Though provisions have been provided to protect poor Americans from being exploited by the inexhaustible governmental resources, when such poor individuals are actually accused of a crime or become a civil litigant opposing governmental interest; the government entities convert the Constitution of the United States into a third-class instrument and apply it systematically, thereby giving the poor a superficial and unequal version of their guaranteed constitutional rights. The author emphasizes that many judges throughout the United States participate in this practice, whose subtlety and details will be explained in depth in the following chapters.

In each of the foregoing factually historic situations, America’s judicial system continues to employ these artifices, which have been modernized, by hiding their illegal tactics and interest behind ever-growing protocol. Please keep in mind that highly publicized cases may give the appearance of fairness, but the overall majority of trials are not media publicized, and therefore, the majority of Americans are being cheated during both criminal and civil trials so that the government’s interest can be promoted regardless of constitutional guarantees. The Constitution of the United States is designed to protect all Americans from the foregoing behavior.2

As the reader will soon learn, American judges, as far as the Supreme Court of the United States, have essentially abolished the Constitution of the United States through subterfuge. Chapters 2–10 will enlighten all American citizens and others to the secret illegal tactics practiced by American judges, all· over America, against black, Hispanic, female, and average- to low-income Americans. Chapters 12–17 offer a guide to all Americans as to how to conduct their own affairs in open court involving both civil and criminal matters, with or without a lawyer, and challenge the secret unlawful practices aforementioned wrought within America’s judicial system.3

---

1 In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, at 37-39 (1968), Douglas, J., dissenting, and Allen v. Illinois, 478 U.S. 364, at 383 (1986), Stevens, J., dissenting, and scores of other United States Supreme Court rulings: (the supreme law of the land) wherein fellow justices have indirectly accused their colleagues of communism or the stealthy watering down of the very basic of America’s constitutional protections, to promote progovernmental partisans’ political ideologies; and these legally created artifices primarily benefits government officials and the affluent and is detrimental to minorities Americans and average to low-income Americans. See Article I section 9 Clause (8) No nobility of classes in the United States of America.

2 The chief justice William H. Rehnquist, Supreme Court, has “embarked on a crusade to curb the rights of the poor and the powerless, Justice Thurgood Marshall said as much before he left the Court in July” Pittsburgh Press, December 15, 1991. The foregoing is true—the Rehnquist Supreme Court is not concerned with any concept of liberty or equality, only in extending the power of the government over the American people. See chapter 6, pages 45-46, for a further elaboration of Justice Rehnquist’s watering down the Constitution.

3 The Civil Rights Act Section 1983, et seq., the Bill of Rights (amendments made to the Constitution of the United States enhancing liberty equality and justice for all Americans) and the Forma Pauperis Doctrine (a provision of law that permits a poor person to process his legal claims in United States Court without cost)—these provisions are systematically sabotaged.

Chapter 2

The Current Judicial Structure

Contrary to most Americans’ be1ief that America’s judicial system is in search for the truth and that “justice is blind.’’ The only thing most American judges are searching for is how to win the state’s case without getting caught in the act of cheating and lying. Justice is not blind in America; rather it is discriminatory. The plain truth of the matter is crime is big business; it is a multibillion dollar industry that employs numerous high-paying and beneficial positions and thousands of varying expertise. In order to maintain this livelihood, there must be an abundant product. Prime candidates for this product are black and Hispanic Americans, particularly the males, average- to low-income Americans, poorly educated Americans, and the American taxpayer. These factors must always be considered by any American subject to the American judicial system’s practices because at all times, during the proceedings the judges, lawyers, expert witnesses, court staff, police, correctional officers, sheriffs, marshals, et cetera, are being paid substantial incomes and benefits. In order for this income to continue, their product potential criminals, poor and uneducated Americans must remain in abundance as any other resource.

For example, if the crime rate reduced 50 percent and half the prison population was released, many prisons would close and police, correctional officers, lawyers, judges, et cetera, would not be in demand, a great many people would be out of work. See chapter 10, page 89, which discusses exploitation of black and Hispanic American males in order to create jobs in all-white rural communities. If more people and businesses were to settle their disputes outside of the court’s jurisdiction before obtaining counsel, the American judicial system would not make much money. Consequently, America’s judicial system has more than just an adjudicative interest during the proceedings; it always has a personal financial interest; for a very good reason these factors are not disclosed to the American public or jurors during trial because it places the officials under scrutiny of a financially based interest during a trial, creating a motive to be deceptive, which could be detrimental to the state’s interest in winning the case.

America’s judicial structure is relatively simple. There is a state forum (state courts) and a federal forum (federal courts); both forums are ran identically, with the exception of the federal courts of the United States, having supremacy over all the s...

Table of contents

• Preamble
• Part I
• Chapter 1
• Chapter 2
• Chapter 3
• Part II
• Chapter 4
• Chapter 5
• Chapter 6
• Chapter 7
• Chapter 8
• Chapter 9
• Chapter 10
• Part III
• Chapter 11
• Chapter 12
• Chapter 13
• Chapter 14
• Chapter 15
• Chapter 16
• Chapter 17
• Appendices
• Appendix 1
• Appendix 2
• Appendix 3
• About the Author