Governance and the realisation of rights of children are intrinsically connected. However, despite it being increasingly recognised across the world that improved or âgoodâ governance is a precondition for sustained poverty reduction and a peaceful and stable society, and being a term that is frequently used by civil society groups, governments and aid agencies at all levels, it is seldom discussed in the context of children. As Sheridan Bartlett points out,
even progressive governments that refer carefully in their policies to âwomen and menâ, may express an unwitting bias against children. This is not unique to government. This bias can run deep in many quarters. Even in discussions among committed development professionals who are fully aware of the benefits of taking gender into account, it is not uncommon for interest to fade if the topic of children comes up. The unspoken message is that bringing children into the discussion is a not-quite-relevant tangentâthat surely their needs are met if their parentsâ needs are met. To some degree, this is true. But it is also true that boys and girls of different ages experience the world in particular ways, and may be affected in particular ways (sometimes profound and long-lasting) by a range of decisions and actions. (2005: 3)
Childrenâs rights even today stand at the same crossroads that womenâs issues did two-and-a-half decades ago. At best they are seen as ornamental, and an add-on to the more âreal problems of societyâ. They are relegated to the realm of touchy-feely sentimental âgood workâ that children need. Childrenâs rights are not seen to be political and mainstream. Often even those put in charge of implementing childrenâs rights do not see it as âreal developmental workâ or âreal governance workâ unlike defence, infrastructure or commerce. Needless to say initiatives for children are presented almost as a cosmetic addition to the ârealâ work of local government, rather than as part of an integrated response that makes children and youth a more visible component of this real work.
Hence, while governance with respect to citizens of any country as a whole has been discussed since the inception of the concept of state, it is nascent in its conceptualisation with reference to children. That is because children have been, and even now continue to be viewed as extensions of adults rather than as citizens in their own right.
The reality is that children are citizens the minute they are born and entitled to as much attention, if not more given their age and vulnerability. Investing in them is as critical in their own interest, as it is in the interest of society. The challenge is that children are unable to demand or exercise their rights and need the recognition and support of adults. The second and perhaps an equally important challenge as well as opportunity is that children grow up, so their status changes. As they grow, they need age-specific inputs. Once they become adults, they will behave and respond to others exactly as they have been responded to as children. They are citizens of today and also adults of tomorrow. And society will reap tomorrow as it sows today.
Clearly, governance begins with recognition of entitlements and citizenship. People do not suddenly become citizens on reaching a certain age. Legal age definitions are arbitrary, and do not reflect the range of capacities of children and adolescents. Human capacities develop and change throughout life at different rates according to individual potential and social environment. They vary from child to child and depend on the contexts they grow up in, on childrenâs mental development (see Article 23 of the Convention on Rights of the Child [CRC]), and their social, economic, cultural and religious background. Citizenship must be learned through everyday experiences of family and community life, education, civic and political awareness. Access to opportunities in school, media, sports and culture is critical for developing and practicing citizenship skills (Inter-Agency Working Group on Childrenâs Participation 2008: 5).
Citizenship represents the collection of rights and obligations that define the members of a community. These rights and obligations encompass legal empowerment and justice, political participation and decision-making, social engagement, economic rights and access to resources. Citizenship has two complementary aspects: citizenship rights and citizenship practice. Citizenship includes notions of rights and responsibilities, status and practice, individual and community. Western cultures tend to emphasise individual rights, whereas Asian societies emphasise the responsibilities of the individual towards family, community and society. In order to thrive, societies require a combination of the two (Inter-Agency Working Group on Childrenâs Participation 2008: 3). The citizenship rights of any individual, including children, include civil, political, social, cultural and economic rights. Civil and political rights are peopleâs entitlements to liberty and equality, and include the rights to freedom of expression and religion, to take part in political life that is appropriate for their age, and to have access to information, skills and opportunities for development and enhanced participation. The civil right to equality is expressed in the right to equal protection to redress if injured by another person and to a fair investigation and trial if suspected of a crime. In some countries, citizenship can also mean ânationalityâ or the membership of a nation state. However, citizenship and nationality are not synonymous. Human rights law does not categorically obligate governments to extend nationality to all residents (ibid.).
If access to rights is restricted to children who only have name and nationality, many children across the world who are fleeing their countries with their parents due to conflicts or economic distress, etc. or who are born of parents who have migrated will be denied protection. It is here that the definition of citizenship that recognises foreigners and stateless persons who are in the country on legal grounds and are able to enjoy the same rights and freedoms and also bear the same duties as citizens, becomes important. Such a presumption of citizenship is a unique child protection provision, which serves to support children affected by conflicts (Duncan 2008). Clearly, a child must be protected and all his/her rights realised wherever he/she is, and this recognition and realisation of rights must not be constrained by boundaries of countries, especially in a world such as the one in which we live today where huge populations are being displaced and forced to move across political boundaries.
A commonly accepted definition of governance is the way the state exercises its political, economic and administrative power. Key attributes of good governance are that institutions and processes are built on the rule of law, accountability, openness, effectiveness and responsiveness and space for equal and meaningful participation to all sections of the society irrespective of caste, creed, religion, class, culture and age group (Abdellatif 2003). This kind of governance would, thus, necessarily be based on a rights-based approach towards its citizenry. Although the term generally refers to the actions undertaken by governments, it is also understood to go beyond government and to include the relationships between formal government institutions and an active civil society. âRather than government taking decisions in isolationâ, explains Diana Mitlin, âthere is a growing acceptance (indeed expectation) of an engaged state negotiating its policies and practices with those who are a party to, or otherwise affected by, its decisionsâ (Mitlin 2004: 1).
It is only with the adoption of the United Nationâs Convention on the Rights of the Child that childrenâs human rights came to be recognised or even addressed separately, based on the recognition of citizenship rights of children. Indeed, it would not be wrong to state that it is also with the requirement of reporting on the general measures of implementation as part of the countriesâ reports to the UN Committee that special attention began to be paid to governance for children. Although most societies may have informal mechanisms for childrenâs participation, the recognition of childrenâs own agency and their right to be heard in decisions concerning them came to be openly discussed and addressed following the UNCRC.
This brings us to two concepts that need to be examined as far as children as citizens are concernedâchildren and governance and children in governance.
Children and governance involves developing an understanding and engagement with the systems of governance that ensure the realisation of the rights of the child. This may not necessarily include the âprotaganismâ of children. Interested adults in society may choose to work on ensuring systems of governance by working towards creating the system, implementing programmes, or through research, advocacy or training.
Children in governance, on the other hand, requires building partnerships with the children themselves participating in governance and recognises that children are âagents of changeâ.
Childrenâs citizenship and governance is concerned with the active participation of girls, boys and young people in the familial, social, economic, political and cultural arenas. It is a step-by-step process through which they develop the skills, understanding and values to influence decision-making and outcomes at local, national and international levels in an environment that recognises them as competent social actors. (Save the Children 2003 and 2004)
This is only possible through the recognition of their right to participation.
The right to participate in decisions made on their behalf is one of the bundles of civil and political ri...