The denied Truth behind Medicine

The big Rethink

Winfried Weber

• Publisher: Books on Demand
• Year: 2020
• Print ISBN: 9783752630190
• eBook ISBN: 9783752637052
• Edition: 1
• Topic: Medicine
• Subtopic: Medical Theory, Practice & Reference

We live in a time in which proven ways of thinking within university medicine crumble. High-ranking researchers report that the statements about the functions of brain, heart, intestine and genome are no longer sustainable.The struggle for knowledge about bodily functions begins anew. In this book Dr. Weber goes back to the basics of medicine. Old and modern medical systems are analyzed and freed from annoying accessories.They are checked for similarities and re-evaluated using the latest scientific tools, such as epigenetics and quantum mechanics.The resulting compact picture of medicine answers many questions and forms the core for a new understanding of life, illness and healing. Dr. Weber transfers this old thinking in an easily understandable way into the comprehension of the world today. The causes of many symptoms are decoded and simple therapy options are presented.

Part 1

Quantum Energetics

Paradigms

A short Treatise on Scientificity and what is opposed to it.

It looks as if we are once again facing a paradigm shift, i.e. the perception of what the world actually is has changed.

In the 16th century, the geocentric world view was still valid: the earth is a disc and the sun rotates around the earth.

The Copernican revolution brought the heliocentric sun system. In Nuremberg in 1543 Copernicus' main work appeared under the title "De revolutionibus orbium coelestium" (about the circular movements of the world's bodies). His discoverer, the physician and astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus, died from a stroke in Frauenburg on 24 May 1543, when his work was published. The criticism of his assertions was fierce. Even Martin Luther reacted with the words: "The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy around! But as the Scriptures show, Joshua meant the sun to stand still, not the earth!"

Copernicus was banned in 1600. It was not until 1757 that the Catholic Church recognized the validity of the Copernican world system. In 1993, Nicolaus Copernicus received a late rehabilitation by Pope John Paul II.

At the end of the 18th century, a young military doctor named Friedrich Schiller submitted the first of three medical dissertations in Karlsruhe. In 1779, under the title "Philosophy of Physiology", Schiller dealt with the question of the relationship between body and mind in the human organism, thus questioning the entire teaching at that time.

He put forward the following thesis:

"There must be a force that comes between spirit and matter and unites them. A force that is changed by matter and that can change the spirit.

This would therefore be a force that is partly spiritual and partly material, a being that is partly permeable and partly impenetrable, ....”

The three responsible experts rejected the dissertation on the basis of its speculative statements, know-it-alls and the unscientific style.

In Jena in 1789, he gave his inaugural academic speech in reaction to this rejection of the topic: "What does universal history mean and at what point in time does one study it? In it he talks about the status of the so-called bread scholar:

"What characterizes a bread scholar? The bread scholar is diligent to fulfil the conditions for a profession and only these. Everything that does not serve this purpose is discarded. He is immediately worried when something new happens in science, because it calls into question his previous knowledge and his previous work. Every innovation frightens him, because it breaks the old.

Well, yes. The question arises whether this bread scholar only existed in the 18th century?

In the 20th century, new controversies arise. Rigid medicine criticizes fluid medicine, structural medicine functional medicine, morphological energetic medicine, guideline medicine information- and quantum medicine, scientists knowledge creators".

Hans-Peter Dürr, physicist and until autumn 1997 director at the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich and winner of the Alternative Nobel Prize, commented on this:

"We still think in the 19th century, although we have technologies that are 20th century.

And now we want to shape the 21st century with "thinking", with technology that is 20th century. That's our problem today."

The German physicist Wolfgang Ludwig adds:

"From an incomplete world view no correct conclusions can be drawn, at best approximations. Only with the inclusion of quantum field physics are valid statements possible."

In all biological structures, the connection between construction and function can be seen. Structure and function are mercilessly connected. At least that's what it says in the syllabus for biology classes. It is a fundamental biological principle that living beings are adapted to their environment in terms of construction and way of life and that the connection between construction and function is recognizable in all biological structures. Without structure there can be no function! But is that really so? Do we not make it too easy for ourselves with this "egg-cup-egg mentality", especially in the medical field? Are structures only limited to the third dimension or, if we think ahead, to the fourth dimension (space and time)?

The effect of many therapies, including anesthesia, is not scientifically deciphered and must therefore be dismissed as unscientific. Our experience shows that something works, only the current state of science is not able to fathom the effect. With the same justification a first grader could question the existence of multiplication.

Fortunately, the great scientists of our time admit that a large amount of scientific facts must be recalled.

The scientific thinking about our thinking, for example, has changed massively in recent years. Until 10 years ago, physiologists were clear about how the thinking process in humans works, which structures are responsible for it, which areas of the brain contain specific functions. In a so-called manifesto of brain research by eleven leading German neuro-scientists from different sub-disciplines it was decided in 2004 to bring clarity into the last secrets of brain function within the following 10 years. The result was sobering. Professor Singer, a leading brain researcher and the former director of the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research in Frankfurt, said about it in the 3Sat programme "Scobel" in 2014:

"15 years ago, many people thought they knew more than we know now. It was thought that if you work your way from the sensory surface of the nerve structures, for example the eye that sees the threat, to the structures of the effector side, the muscles that repel the threat, the function of our brain will become obvious and we will understand all the mechanisms at work here.

The result was sobering. The brain and the thinking process turned out to be a self-active, highly complex, enormously networked, highly-dimensional(!), interconnected system, whose mode of operation could no longer be explained by structures alone”. Matthias Eckoldt, philosopher and writer, described the problem in his book of the same name with the question: Can the brain understand the brain? Prof. Randolf Menzel concludes: "In principle, we know nothing about the brain, because the networks are the main power of the nervous system.

Neuronal structures, the so-called data highways of the brain, were once considered immutable. Today we know that emotional experiences transform these structures. Environmental genetic alterations in the broadest sense, so-called epigenetic influences, also contribute to this transformation of functions. Structures fade into the background”.

Prof. Singer therefore redefines consciousness: "In reality, it is a system composed of many separate subsystems, all of which work on some aspect of perception or future planning. All sub-systems are interlinked and communicate with each other. The interconnection is designed in such a way that coherent (contiguous) states can arise from it, which organize themselves and do not need a leader. The best one imagines an orchestra that can play without a conductor when it has agreed on a common rhythm”. Source: Scobel 3sat

New Worlds

The Quantum Field

A possible answer to the "How can something like our brain and the control of our thoughts function" can be derived from the 12-dimensional or quantum field model by Burkhard Heim and Dröscher. This model has been proven several times but is doubted by many scientists, as it is probably not understood. The 12-dimensional model describes how our world functions. It consists of a lot of formulas that are not comprehensible for non-physicists, which doesn’t make it more popular. It describes information and quantum fields and thus falls into the field of quantum mechanics. In this context the words of Richard Feynman are reassuring, who said: "Whoever believes to have understood quantum theory, has not understood it". Those who nevertheless want to deal with the 12-dimensional model more intensively should refer to the work of the physicists Wolfgang Ludwig and Andreas Resch which is available on the in ternet. The quantum model divides our world into 12 dimensions, according to the peel of anonion. The three-dimensional world forms the core. The 4th dimension, time, gives existence to the first three dimensions for our senses. In the 5th and 6th dimension follows the organizational space (S2), a logistics center, which has the task of realizing events, behavior and structures in time. The 7th and 8th dimension (I2), the informational space, represents a general database (the morphogenetic field, the Akashic Chronicle), which stores and makes data available for our four-dimensional world (R4).

The 9th to 12th dimension (G4) stands for the collective consciousness, the mental space that guides our destiny and the destiny of the world.

For a better understanding an example from the real world. Imagine a newspaper publisher. The publisher and the editor-in-chief are sitting in the executive floor (G4, 9th to 12th floor). The publisher and the editor-in-chief determine the journalistic guideli...

Table of contents

• Table of Contents
• Instead of a Preface: The evil Spirit
• Part 1: Quantum Energetics
• Part 2: Psychosomatics
• Part 3: Clusters and Reaction Patterns
• Part 4: Therapy
• Part 5: Segments: The Interaction of segmental and non-segmental Complaints
• Part 6: Stress Metabolism
• The Author
• Further information
• Copyright