Christians in the Crosshairs
eBook - ePub

Christians in the Crosshairs

Persecution in the Bible and Around the World Today

Gregory C. Cochran

Share book
  1. 208 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Christians in the Crosshairs

Persecution in the Bible and Around the World Today

Gregory C. Cochran

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

An insightful and (surprisingly) encouraging biblical explanation as to why trouble and persecution are inevitable for Christians. Since they are a peculiar people, and since they in the world but not of the world, and since they follow a Master who is offensive to many, Christians are naturally the objects of disdain and hostility. Understanding the nature of the enmity between the world and the Christian is critical for living in a world where Satan is its prince. The book is an attempt to start a conversation about the reality of Christian persecution. It is a wake-up call to the modern church, especially in United States. "My hope for all who read this volume, " writes the author, "is a strengthened faith. One of the most surprising aspects of studying persecution has been its effect on me. I thought I would be dour and woeful-defeated-after hearing of great suffering. The opposite is true. The gospel-with its resurrection power-is able to take the worst situations and reframe them in victory. Hearing stories of triumph through suffering has been nothing short of glorious."

Frequently asked questions

How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Christians in the Crosshairs an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Christians in the Crosshairs by Gregory C. Cochran in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Theology & Religion & Religious Intolerance, Persecution & Conflict. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

PART 1

image

THE MEANING AND MAGNITUDE
OF CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION

1

TOWARD A DEFINITION
OF CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION AND MARTYRDOM

image
A man’s enemies will be the members of his household.
(Matt. 10:36)
What do we mean when we say that Christians everywhere will suffer persecution? In Kentucky, a high school baseball player was dismissed from his team for missing practices on Sundays. Was he persecuted for being a Christian? In war-torn Sudan, Muslims from the north razed villages where Christians and animists once lived. Were those Christians suffering persecution? In Detroit, a group of street preachers were struck with rocks and bottles and harassed by police while trying to witness at a Muslim event. Were they persecuted? Christian lawyers like Gao Zhisheng fighting against the abuse of human rights in China have been imprisoned and tortured. Should their suffering be termed “persecution”?
Tryon Edwards, a great-grandson of Jonathan Edwards, once asserted, “Most controversies would soon be ended, if those engaged in them would first accurately define their terms, and then adhere to their definitions.”1 Edwards might have been too optimistic about the end of controversy, but he was right to note the power that definitions have to diffuse it. A trip to the local library or bookstore proves our faith in the power of definitions.

The Power of Definitions

Consider the prevalence of English dictionaries. My local bookstore sells dictionaries for synonyms, war terms, business terms, legal terms, theological terms, and psychological terms. An almost endless stream of dictionaries flows out of an ocean of words. These words break upon the pages of our literature and land upon our minds, empowering creative thinking. Our thoughts actually ride upon a surf of words.
But words — like waves — do not always come as docile tides rolling in on a white sand shore. Rather, words break upon our ears and crash into our minds, often provoking crises. As the existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre once declared, “Words are loaded pistols.”2 Defining words, then, can be a dangerous game. Words are, in fact, the means by which reality takes (and keeps) its shape. Consider, for example, how the Nazis defined “treason” and “loyalty” for Germans in the 1940s — and consider the implications for Germany and the world!
In our own history, the word “person” has suffered terrible damage. In the nineteenth century, the word excluded a race of human beings who were subsequently bought and sold as slaves; those humans suffered the excruciating consequences of a horrible definition. Today, the word “person” excludes human babies developing in the womb, and the result causes untold pain and suffering for men and women in the aftermath of abortions — not to mention the millions of deaths of unborn babies. Subtle changes in the definitions of words can have cataclysmic long-term effects for us because definitions are significant.
Here we return to Edwards’s point. Definitions do provide clarity and can lead to unity, but that unity does not always equate with what is good. Germany in 1942 and the South in 1840 were, for the most part, united in their definitions of key terms. (Thankfully, both of those thought-systems were eventually overthrown.) Here is why I said that Edwards was too optimistic about definitions ending controversy. Definitions of “treason” were clear in Nazi Germany. The definitions of words like “slave” and “free” were clear in the South. And war was the necessary outcome in each case. Often, clear definitions fuel controversy. Consider the definition of marriage.
The generally accepted evangelical definition of “marriage” — one man with one woman for a lifetime — is both perfectly clear and undeniably controversial. Paul Nyquist warns Christians concerning the new definition of marriage, saying, “It’s impossible to overstate the impact of the abandonment of biblical marriage.”3 Nyquist’s point is that the convenience of Christian living in America has been lost. If Nyquist is correct, then Christians must become ever more familiar with definitions of two key terms: “persecution” and “marriage.”
Christians must define these two words clearly, as the two appear destined to remain hitched for decades. The term “marriage” is obviously undergoing a redefinition in our culture. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) has fallen on notoriously difficult times. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of recognizing gay marriage in the Obergfell v. Hodges decision, same-sex unions became legal in all fifty states. What the limits are to the new definition of marriage, no one knows. After a federal judge overturned Utah’s ban of polygamous marriages, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver is now deciding the famous “Sister Wives” case which condones group marriage.4 In other states, relatives are seeking to define marriage as consenting adults — demanding freedom from the former restraint against incestuous relationships.
Because marriage is now redefined, Christians will be tested on whether we believe our own definitions. Do we as Christians believe God’s monogamous design for heterosexual marriage? Will Christians stand on these convictions? What if group marriages, gay marriages, or even bestial marriages become matters of civil rights? Will Christians remain steadfast in their biblical convictions? Will we pay the price in persecution? What if a church loses its tax-exempt status as a result of monogamous marriage commitments? What if pastors are convicted of civil rights crimes — or hate crimes — and sent to jail for refusing to marry a small group of lovers?
Persecution may flow freely from the deluge of court decisions against traditional marriage. Already, Christian businesses have been shuttered for refusing to participate in gay wedding ceremonies. Surely, Christian churches and ministries will soon be in jeopardy.5 Thus, Christians need adequate definitions of “marriage” and “persecution” so that we can understand what and why we are suffering — and have the right attitude and the right response to our suffering. We must, however, be careful with our definitions.
Returning to Sartre’s point — that words are loaded pistols — we must think through the consequences of how we use the term “persecution.” The definition we offer will shape Christian values and Christian practice. Those who suffer persecution are highly esteemed by the church — as they should be. In the spirit of Paul’s admonition to imitate him the way he imitates Christ (2 Cor. 4:11), Christians have sought to imitate (and sometimes even venerate in an almost worshipful manner) those martyred for the faith. Christians watch and mimic the manners in which other Christians face persecution. Why? One reason is so they might imitate them in the way that Stephen, the first martyr after Christ, imitated his Lord through persecution. Christian moral character is shaped by how we define words like “persecution” and “martyr.” As Christians, we need to know how to identify those among us who truly suffer persecution.
But here’s the problem: persecution means many things to many different people. One recent article stated that wild birds were being persecuted in northern England.6 Whatever the journalist covering bird crime in Great Britain meant by his use of the term, the Christian surely must understand it in a radically different way. Both Christians and birds of prey can be hunted and even threatened with extinction. Both Christians and wild birds can also give glory to God, but Christians alone are victimized explicitly on account of witnessing to their Creator’s glory. Persecuting birds is not the same as persecuting Christians.
So, in the midst of our cultural confusion about marriage and with a dizzying array of popular definitions of persecution — covering everything from the birds of Great Britain to suicide bombers in the Middle East — Christians need clarity. What do we mean when we speak about Christian persecution today? A small controversy has erupted among theologians and missiologists attempting to answer this question.

Who Are the Persecuted?

Christians are not in agreement on the number of believers suffering persecution around the world. One recent news article reported that as many as 10 million Christians suffer persecution each year. While 10 million is a large number, it is a significantly small percentage of the more than 2 billion people on earth who claim to be Christians. Considering that the apostle Paul promised persecution to all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus (2 Tim. 3:12), shouldn’t the number be greater? Whether great or small, the number is difficult to pinpoint.
In the summer of 2013, Christianity Today published an article explaining why Christians have difficulty tallying numbers for persecution and martyrdom.7 Groups like the Center for the Study of Global Christianity report that there are more than 100,000 martyrdoms per year,8 while other groups such as Open Doors claim a more modest 1,200 martyrs per year. The problem is obvious. One figure puts the number of martyrs 83 times greater than the other. Why can’t we agree on such a significant matter of Christian interest? The problem isn’t with our math as much as it is with our definitions. Our lack of specificity is rooted in our lack of clearly defined terms. Until we can define “martyr” adequately, we cannot hope to count the number of martyrs accurately.
Christian leaders have been pleading for better definitions of “persecution” and “martyrdom” for decades. In 1974, the International Congress for World Evangelization (the Lausanne Congress) met to strategize the fulfillment of Christ’s commission in Matthew 28:18–20. The Lausanne Congress was sober-minded enough to recognize that making disciples among all tribes and nations would lead to an increase in persecution: not all authorities are fond of Christianity! Thus, Lausanne called for increased study in the areas of Christian suffering — particularly in understanding what it means to suffer for Christ’s sake. Some thirty years later, in 2004, the Lausanne Congress published as a follow-up an occasional paper titled “The Persecuted Church,” which reiterated, “There is clearly a need for deeper theological reflection on the issues pertaining to suffering, persecution, martyrdom, religious freedom, and human rights, and an appropriate Christian response.”9
Now, more than ten years beyond Lausanne’s occasional paper, the need for definition is only more acute. In reference to the wildly disparate numbers relating to martyrdom, the Christianity Today article notes, “Much of the discrepancy hinges on how researchers define martyr, and how closely they double-check each death.”10 Obviously, the first aspect of this diagnosis relates to the difficulty of defining “persecution” and “martyrdom,” but even the second aspect depends on the very same thing. What would be the purpose of double-checking each death if it were not to discover whether the victim was actually a martyr? And how is one to determine whether a victim should be called a martyr without first understanding whether that person suffered persecution on account of Christ? It seems mandatory to build the definition of “martyr” on the logically prior foundation of the meaning of “persecution.”
Researchers have been plagued by the question of whether or not a Christian’s death was martyrdom. But to answer that question sufficiently, we must know if this person was persecuted on account of Christ. Instead of asking, “Did she die a martyr’s death?” we should ask, “Was it persecution for Christ’s sake that led to her death?” There is a degree of specificity that exists in the latter question; yet such a question still depends on our ability to define “persecution on account of Christ” sufficiently.

Toward a Definition

So, what is persecution on account of Christ? Nik Ripken’s succinct definition gets right to the point: Christian persecution is “a negative reaction to the incarnate presence of Jesus.”11 Later chapters in this book put more flesh on this barebones definition. Already, this simple definition helps because it separates persecution from many other forms of suffering.
Consider the kinds of suffering persecution is not.12 Human beings suffer for many reasons. Because we are in the world, we as Christians suffer as the rest of the world suffers. In 1976, an earthquake struck China and killed more than 250,000 people, including atheists, Buddhists, Muslims, and Christians. The so-called Christmas Tsunami of 2004 killed in excess of 280,000 people of varying faiths along the coast of Indonesia. And even in America, when heart disease strikes one of the 600,000 who will die from it this year, it will not first determine whether its victim is Christian. Christians, like all human beings, suffer from the frailties of the human condition: famine, disease, droughts, floods, and war.
None of this suffering is rightly called persecution. When we speak of Christian persecution, we are moving beyond suffering as Christians to a very specific form of suffering — suffering because we are Christian. Ripken’s definition makes that plain. Christian suffering ...

Table of contents