How would capturing 1 million views on social media change your life? Would it make you rich? Famous? Would having a million views give you greater influence, in your business or personally?
The reality in today's world is that attracting enough views at the right time definitely gives you clout. Just as with popular movies, TV shows or public speaking, the more you can attract people's attention, the more people will stand still long enough to listen to what you have to say. If they like it, they'll be more likely to come back and listen to what you have to say next time. If they don't, they may still come back to check you out next time. However they feel, they will begin to rely on the value you deliver to help enrich their own knowledge and therefore their own public profile.
The game, the fame game, has been around since the amphitheatres of ancient Greece and Rome. What's new is the multitude of ways in which our messages can now be delivered, how we can reach crowds of almost unimaginable size, and the skills we need to master the arts of this mass communication. Get them right and you can influence a lot more people more easily than has ever been possible before. There has never been a better time to spread your message and increase the influence of your business and, ultimately, your bottom line.
It wasn't long ago that prime-time TV was the go-to platform for delivering a commercial message to the masses. But with the maturation of social media, the exponential growth of the digital audience and the evolution of the first generation of digital natives (whose entire lives have been dominated by digital communication), there is a new powerhouse in the attention space.
The new player, which sits at the pinnacle of attention-grabbing excellence, is the viral video.
For those who don't know, viral videos are online videos that seem to spread through a life force of their own. Once posted, for very specific reasons that I will explain in the course of this book, they trigger viewers to push them out to greater audiences by sharing, commenting and engaging with them. Audience interaction is the vital difference between videos that attract millions of views and others that attract none.
Anything video — my early experience
Understanding how to trigger this ‘sharing’ was the challenge that captured my attention with the growth of online video culture. During the early 2000s I was a TV journalist for Australia's biggest and most popular TV network. I was producing three or four stories a week for a public affairs show whose primary, unashamed focus was on attracting as much viewer attention as possible. Critics would often say this came at the expense of ‘good’ journalism. The truth is that unlike news reporting, where the structure of a story is 90 per cent predetermined, public affairs allowed for greater creativity, higher production values, more storytelling and, yes, often a bit of ‘shock and awe’ too.
I had at my disposal professional camera operators, editors, researchers, producers … and millions of dollars' worth of the latest technical equipment. I also had something of a captive audience. With only 10 TV channels, the Australian audience didn't have that much choice in what to watch. As a result, our show attracted a significant national audience of around 1.8 million viewers a night.
At the time, this put the show at the top of the ratings: it was a bulletproof, ever-reliable attention-grabbing machine. So much so that executives were totally unprepared for the approaching tsunami of Facebook, YouTube and the rest. Whenever these platforms, today's social media giants, were raised in conversation, the bosses dismissed them. They never anticipated a world in which anyone had the potential capacity to broadcast their own message to a global audience. They continued to ignore the advances in phone technology that led to HD cameras becoming standard issue. They didn't believe that mobile networks would be able to handle the data amounts it takes to deliver video affordably for the mass market. And they absolutely refused to believe the general public would be able to produce better content than they could. The truth they missed is that the world had changed. TV networks are no longer protected by expensive infrastructure and the high cost of entry. Their traditional advantages have evaporated; their business model is broken. YOU now wield the power. You can broadcast your own message and if you're good enough, you will attract a million views.
From the very beginning I found the internet intriguing. I had a cousin who was building chatrooms and online noticeboards that operated over the family phone lines in the late 1980s. I remember my mum and aunty never being able to speak because the computers had taken the phones offline. By the time my cousin was in his late teens, those hobbies had grown into a significant business. This early exposure opened my eyes to the possibilities of the internet. But the thing was, I found no joy in chatrooms or coding. My real love was for anything video, especially storytelling and communicating, games and cameras. I loved video games that followed stories and I leapt at any chance to get closer to a video camera. Those chances were rare in the eighties. We certainly never owned one, so my exposure to the art of filming was restricted to sometimes at school getting to share a 15-minute window with four other kids, all of us recording on the same VHS tape. It was far from ideal, but it was enough to give me the video storytelling bug.
In my final year of school I learned I was the first student in the State of Victoria, if not Australia, to submit a final-year assignment on VHS tape. It was all shot and edited in camera. (And if anyone from the Victorian Education Department is reading this, I would love that tape back sometime.) My first job was in TV, as were my second and third, each step getting me closer to creating and producing stories using video. By the late nineties my two overriding interests — video and the internet — started to converge. I didn't know it at the time but this changed things; it changed humans, the way we communicate and interact and, most important to my mind, the way we share.
At first, online videos spread as tiny, low-res files attached to long email chains. Numbers of views weren't recorded. Their success was measured by how long the daisy chain of email addresses was, and also by word of mouth. Then came websites and forums with catalogues of links to videos. Those early sites led naturally to the creation of video platforms, the unrivalled king of which is YouTube.
Understandably, YouTube began as an unsophisticated, somewhat random platform without so much as a Share button — it was a matter of copying the URL and emailing the link around — but before too long, driven by its popularity, YouTube scaled, and it scaled hard. In 2005, Nike produced the first video to reach a million views. That milestone finally had media bosses and brands starting to take notice, albeit still half-heartedly, and even today not nearly enough.
As more and more videos reached tha...