1
AQUARIAN ALTERNATIVES
Midcentury Media and the Quest for Occultly Queer Histories
PARIS, 1960. AFTER MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY that witnessed the publication of some of the most influential works in modern Continental thought, including Sigmund Freudâs The Interpretation of Dreams (1900), Carl Jungâs Psychology of the Unconscious (1912), and Georges Batailleâs The Accursed Share (1949), two Frenchmen declared that human civilization was approaching the dawn of a new age, one that would have nothing in common with the present realm of âlaborious transition in which we have to live for just a little while longer.â1 Trained respectively in journalism and chemical engineering before embarking on more esoteric endeavors, Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier had become increasingly disaffected with life in the modern world. The utopian promises of scientific modernity, they lamented, had been crushed in the aftermath of two cataclysmic world wars. All signs now seemed to point to the necessity for radical change and the reenchantment of a world increasingly secularized and demystified. By turning away from the philosophical lens of structuralism, through which the world could be known, rationalized, and tamed via linguistic analysis, Pauwels and Bergier advocated an alternative route to transcendence: a return to the occult.
Originally published in 1960 and translated into English in 1963, Pauwels and Bergierâs The Morning of the Magicians (Le Matin des magiciens) quickly became a best seller on both sides of the Atlantic, sold over one million copies worldwide by the end of the decade, and became a primer for countless individual and collective journeys into a budding midcentury fascination with all things supernatural. Human beings were endowed with powers âat least equal, if not superior, to any technically realizable machinery, and intended to achieve the same results as any other technique,â the authors believed, ânamely the ability to understand and control Universal forces.â2 A belief in the dualistic synergy of body and mind, and of the latterâs ability to similarly conquer the rigidities of matter, was no longer rejected as the stuff of fairy tales. On the contrary, both ancient and modern magickal literature was dedicated to âunique and fantastic moments in the life of the mind, thousands and thousands of fragmentary descriptions which ought to be brought together and compared, and which perhaps point to a method that has been lost, or possibly to one that has still to be found.â3 For Pauwels, Bergier, and their devoted readers, human control of occult energies was not anathema to nature, but rather a demonstrative revival of historically neglected natural laws that were produced in close contact with reality âperceived directly and not through a filter of habit, prejudice, conformism. Modern science has shown us that behind the visible there is an extremely complicated invisible,â yet one that is nevertheless intelligible via more esoteric means.4
It is on this point, the verifiable legacies of the occult, that The Morning of the Magicians is quite clear. Anticipating poststructuralismâs own project of destabilizing the dichotomy between the real and the phantasmatic, Pauwels and Bergier caution that the supernatural is by no means reducible to the imaginary. However, a âpowerful imagination working on reality will discover that the frontier between the marvelous and the actualâbetween the visible and the invisible Universe, if you wishâis a very fine one.â5 Indeed, according to Gary Valentine Lachman, one of the founding members of the New Wave rock band Blondie, who has since transitioned from his musical career to writing popular histories of Western occultism, The Morning of the Magicians brought together âthe future and the past, science and mysticism, philosophy and the occult, with a powerful, inspiring optimism and a new vision of human societyâjust about everything the sixties were about.â6 While the image of a swaying flower child wreathed in incense while grooving to the far-out sounds of a sitar might now seem clichĂŠ, thereâs no question that all things âoccultly marvelous,â as Theodore Roszak puts it, were en vogue during this period.7 In turn, the popular resurrection of occult figures like the vampire and the witch became laden with the hopes, dreams, anxieties, and fears of a new generation.
Throughout the 1960s and early 1970s, Euro-American popular culture became swept up in a revival of esoteric occultism the likes of which hadnât been witnessed in the West since the fin-de-siècle days of Russian mystic Helena Petrovna Blavatskyâs Theosophical Society and Aleister Crowleyâs Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.8 From Los Angeles to Baltimore, nearly every national news outlet marveled at the resurgence of this phenomenon. âIt is one of the stranger facts about the contemporary U.S.,â Time reported in March 1969, that unorthodox conceptions of the universe are being taken up âseriously and semiseriously by the most scientifically sophisticated generation of young adults in history. Even the more occult arts of palmistry, numerology, fortunetelling and witchcraftâtraditionally the twilight zone of the undereducated and overanxiousâare catching on with youngsters.â9 As Paul Steiger of the Los Angeles Times observed, âaround the nation, the practitioners of the occult, the mysterious and the mystical are enjoying a heyday unmatched since the Salem witch trials.â10 And as Penny Kolsrud of the Baltimore Sun detailed within what she termed a flourishing trend of âAquarian Alternatives,â âthe new lifestyle of the young is not merely a matter of marijuana versus martini . . . itâs an unconventional way of looking at the self, the world and the universe. Part of this different way of life is a burgeoning interest in ESP, Eastern religions and the occultâastrology, witchcraft, numerology, [and] tarot.â11
More than individual searches for spiritual transcendence, however, this revived interest in all things occult translated into big collective business, particularly in the entertainment industries. On bookstore shelves, Ray Bradburyâs Something Wicked This Way Comes (1962), Shirley Jacksonâs We Have Always Lived in the Castle (1962), Robert Blochâs The Skull of the Marquis de Sade (1965), and Ira Levinâs Rosemaryâs Baby (1967) promised to enthrall horror-seeking readers. On television, series like The Twilight Zone (CBS, 1959â64), Thriller (NBC, 1960â62), The Outer Limits (ABC, 1963â65), The Addams Family (ABC, 1964â66), The Munsters (CBS, 1964â66), and Dark Shadows (ABC, 1966â71) turned supernatural screen narratives into staples of network programming. And in film, Black Sunday (1960), Black Sabbath (1963), The Crimson Cult (1968), Roman Polanskiâs adaptation of Rosemaryâs Baby (1968), Roger Cormanâs cycle of Edgar Allan Poe adaptations at American International Pictures (AIP), and the Gothic revival at Englandâs Hammer Studios made occult storylines some of the most successful offerings in 1960s screen horror.
Indeed, this pop culture revitalization of interest in witchcraft, vampirism, and other occultly marvelous phenomena quickly ascended to the heights of 1960s counterculture, a movement composed of young people around the globe who became âdeeply critical of and disengaged from the values of white middle-class suburban family lifeâ vis-Ă -vis experimentation with mysticism and mind-altering drugs.12 In the United States, such antiassimilationist and antiestablishment beliefs were both dissected and disseminated in best-selling works like Timothy Learyâs The Politics of Ecstasy (1968), Theodore Roszakâs The Making of a Counter Culture (1969), Jerry Rubinâs DO IT!: Scenarios of the Revolution (1970), and Abbie Hoffmanâs Steal This Book (1971). This countercultural epoch ushered in by the peacefully innocuous hopes of Pauwels and Bergier would eventually turn, however, to what Lachman terms the âdark side of the Age of Aquarius,â epitomized by Anton LaVeyâs Church of Satan, the rise of Charles Mansonâs (oc)cult of personality, and the Helter Skelter murders of August 1969.
Yet, as demonstrated throughout this book, the very fact that certain value-laden binaries (e.g., light vs. dark, good vs. evil, sin vs. sanctity, normal vs. queer, etc.) have been historically mapped onto supposedly self-evident hierarchies of spiritual belief is itself a manifestation of intermingling normative regimes working in tandem to curtail the influences of alterity. And nowhere have such efforts to restrain the unorthodox, the dissident, and the queer forces of the occult proved more contentious than in the arenas of gender and sexuality, wherein magickal practitioners have embraced âmorally deviant and socially transgressive acts such as homosexual intercourse, masturbation, sadomasochism, and bestialityâ as the most powerful means of unleashing supernatural powers that might dismantle the machinations of heteronormativity.13
Queer Hauntings of the Sexual Revolution
While the postwar period in both the United States and beyond ushered in a new age of unprecedented economic, social, and political change, the decade following such landmark events as the rise of mass suburbanization, Senator Joseph McCarthyâs political witch hunts, and the widespread domestic installation of television is often remembered not only for the rise of far-reaching countercultural energies but also for those shifts in medicine, media, and cultural mores known collectively as the sexual revolution. First used by the Austrian psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich during the 1920s, the term âsexual revolutionâ has come to stand in for a constellation of watershed moments whose influence reached their peak during the 1960s, among them the release of the Kinsey Reports in 1948 and 1953, the inaugural publication of Playboy magazine (1953), the Food and Drug Administrationâs approval of oral contraception (âthe pillâ) in 1960, the publication of Helen Gurley Brownâs Sex and the Single Girl (1962), the release of Masters and Johnsonâs Human Sexual Response (1966), and the Stonewall riots of June 1969. Yet popular mythology surrounding the sexual revolution has tended to blur the lines between fact and embellished fiction. As a corrective, many cultural studies scholars have recently refrained from focusing solely on the events of the sexual revolution and have instead turned their attention to questioning just how revolutionary the sexual revolution really was and exactly whose interests were served by it.14
Existing historical records leave little doubt that the 1960s and early 1970s brought both material and discursive changes, aptly described by Linda Williams as a societal transition from obscenity to âon/scenity,â the progression through which a culture âbrings on to its public ...