The military era inadvertently played a crucial part in the shaping of the Nigerian literary tradition, out of which Zulu Sofola emerged with the publication of plays such as The Deer and the Hunters Pearl (1969); Wedlock of the Gods (1972); Old Wines are Tasty (1981); The Operators (1973); King Emene (1974); The Wizard of Law (1975); The Sweet Trap (1977); Memories in the Moonlight (1986); Queen Omu-ako of Oligbo (1989); Eclipso and the Fantasia (1990); Song of a Maiden (1992); Lost Dreams and other plays (1992). These plays essentially constitute Sofola's major platform for espousing her ideas about human social, cultural and spiritual essentialities. Sofola may not have directly used her plays to “criticize the military” as some leftist critics have expected, the sociopolitical environment created by military governance inspired her writing generally.
But it is not surprising that the role and character of the military institution in the trajectory of Nigeria's sociopolitical experience have been generally painted in very distasteful images by critics. By constitutional design, the military is an arm of the Executive arm of government. Its primary responsibility is to defend the country against external aggression. But its emergence in actual and control of executive and legislative space through seising of power from the constitutionally elected government has given observers the opportunity to examine how much damage it has done to contribute to the general problem of underdevelopment in Nigeria. Gbemisola Adeoti, Charles Nnolim, Umelo Ojinmah and Edwin Onwuka are amongst critics who conclude that military leadership is perhaps the worst of all African countries’ challenges. Ojinmah's (86) reading of Chinua Achebe's Anthills of the Savannah, for instance, led him to the conclusion that Achebe sees
the soldiers as not being any better than the civilians….if anything, they have become worse, having perfected torture, intimidation and cold blooded killings as weapons to cow the opponents of their policies.
In spite of this, the role of the military in the nation's quest for sociopolitical, economic and human capacity development in education and literacy can be described as a double-edged sword. Nigeria's military performance in the political space is actually highlighted by a paradox of “the goodness in evil,” which has offered an opportunity to literary critics to evaluate the extent to which literature has been affected by military governance. On one hand, the presence of the military in governance has provided a window for writers such as Chinua Achebe as Ojinmah noted to depict them as despotic and visionless in Anthills of the Savannah or as the bane of social, economic and political corruption by Femi Osofisan in Once Upon Four Robbers. To the Nigerian creative writer, the Nigerian military institution and its system of governance are quintessentially ready material for the development of the Historical Novel or Drama, a literary genre that is very vibrant in African literature in one way or the other.
On the other hand, the military incursion into civil governance and its usurpation of the social and political landscape is crucial in the development of literary consciousness and criticism in Nigeria (Okunoye, 2011; Osofisan, 1986). This perspective, in particular, has partly answered the question as to how much military governance has been responsible both for promoting literacy in Nigeria and giving the Nigerian literary space a ready window to imaginatively capture Nigerian history, politics and governance, social contract, family life, etc. Okunoye (3) further remarks that critical responses to the restrictive and choking conditioning of the social and political scene by the military are an attempt to recognise certain literary works in Nigeria as belonging to a distinctive genre of Nigerian poetry. He asserts:
Even though writing against dictatorship may immediately suggest writing solely preoccupied with criticising dictators, the tradition has grown, impacting in the process on the form and media of poetic expression.
Therefore, the post Nigerian Civil War military period (the period between 1970 and 1979 when Nigeria returned to civilian rule for the second time since independence) was directly and indirectly instrumental to the crystallising of the imaginative potentials of Nigerian men and women of letters. Nigerian literature at this time blossomed, drawing its inspiration from the diverse issues arising from the historical, social, political, cultural and economic experiences of the country. It is this creative explosion that further resulted in the production of cultural and creative works that unarguably began to further change the narrative about the authenticity of Nigerian literature. By then, the debates about what could be regarded as Nigerian literature or as Nnolim (69) puts it, “the Nigerian tradition in literature” had reached not only its momentum but also its critical landmark.
Specifically, with the pioneer efforts of Wole Soyinka and John Pepper Clark, in particular, announcing the emergence of modern Nigerian drama in the world stage through their ingenious utilisation of traditional and indigenous oral and cultural materials, sustaining the tradition of African myth and the poetics of mythology on the African drama stage became a crucial task to both these icons and Zulu Sofola who wrote her first play in 1969. It is sad enough that the Nigerian civil war of 1967 to 1970 imposed a period of interregnum on the pace of writing in the country. But when drama resurfaced after the war, its concerns with projecting the African tradition on stage became even more interesting as it extended its coverage and space beyond the common, ordinary imagination of its patrons. This is because the creative attention of dramatists was drawn to both the immediate experiences of the war and its implications on the larger, more contemporary Nigerian and African social and political climate. Even though Soyinka and Clark continued to lead the way, the group of Zulu Sofola, Femi Osofisan, Ola Rotimi, Bode Sowande, etc., not only sustained the momentum, upheld the established criteria of the Nigerian-ness set by Soyinka and Clark but also expanded the frontiers of dramatic coverage in form and content by writing from ideological standpoints, thus, introducing two key western critical theoretical frameworks, Marxism and Feminism into the criticism of their dramas. Sofola's feminist leaning and gender concern at this period was groundbreaking in the history of Nigerian drama.
Osofisan (2) writes that amongst other factors, the post-civil war period was remarkable in the annals of Nigerian literature as there was
…a significant growth in the literacy level, consequent upon the expansion in educational institutions (e.g., thirteen universities existed in 1980 as compared with only six in 1970) and added to this was the lure of renown, concretised in the inspiring success of our pioneer writers of the first generation.
Thus, despite its bad image of dictatorship and lack of respect for civil governance, the military institution in Nigeria can earn some credit for being instrumental to the growth of play writing and theatre practice. It has to be stated also that the memorisation of the genocidal conflict of the Nigerian civil war has been done in several forms as researches and studies on Nigerian history through drama. Many plays written at this period have served to document the Nigerian political and military experiences and the postcolonial self-determination struggles by Nigerian and non-Nigerian authors across the board. The role played by Zulu Sofola in this regard is too crucial to be ignored in the development of Nigerian drama to African theatre.