Conceptual framework | Section 1 |
Developmental examination is a part of the process of early identification of childrenās developmental difficulties. It is most meaningful when it builds on the developmental surveillance for all children and leads to further focused assessment, investigations, facilitative guidance, support and intervention (Table 1). Developmental examination is undertaken in response to parental or other professionalsā concerns regarding a childās function and/or behaviour and to proactively monitor progress in children with health or social risks.
Table 1 Process for identification of developmental needs | Objectives | Methods |
| Surveillance: Universal: for all children | Promoting health and development; promotion of good care and parenting; identification of risk factors; early presumptive identification of developmental difficulties. | Ongoing process involving parents (through the use of a personal child health record) and practitioners working with children at the universal level, e.g. child development workers, health visitors and general practitioners. |
| Developmental examination | To verify concerns, to elicit and categorise developmental function and any likely risk or impairment, provide support and guidance and arrange further assessment and/or investigations as required. | Clinical evaluation based on the knowledge of developmental progression and factors influencing it, skills and tools for eliciting concerns, history and making developmental observations. |
| Developmental assessment: for established concerns | To provide a detailed description of the childās developmental strengths and weaknesses for management planning and monitoring. | Standardised assessment methods used by paediatricians, psychologists and therapists, e.g. Griffithās or Bayleyās scales. |
| Diagnostic or functional assessment | Diagnostic or functional assessment for management planning | Diagnostic tools, e.g. Autism Diagnostic Observations Schedule or functional assessment tools used by therapists. |
The wide variation in ages at which typically developing children achieve developmental milestones may create difficulties in identifying children with vulnerabilities. Practitioners risk causing a delay in identification or falsely reassuring parents if they use subjective impressions to comment on the childās developmental progress (Glascoe and Dworkin 1993). Standardised tests of development differentiate children, comparing their performance to the expected norms, for their level of abilities or function. These tests are considered as gold standard by some but may be impractical in terms of time, unsuitable for the childās comprehension or motor abilities, and often too narrowly focused on measuring development (Greenspan and Meisels 1996).
Developmental examination may, on its own, lack the sensitivity and specificity of standardised assessments, but combined with the right knowledge, training and experience, and connected with the wider system of developmental surveillance, it has a useful place in promoting positive developmental outcomes. Developmental examination generally takes place when risks or concerns have been identified by parents or professionals. It enables professionals to identify any vulnerability, provide the required guidance and support, and access further detailed assessment and/or intervention services as required.
The structured developmental examination framework described here combines knowledge of the sequence of developmental progression* and an understanding of the processes influencing development (see Influences on development, p. 14 below), with the tools of systematic enquiry and observation. It provides a practical stepwise approach for eliciting concerns and normative and qualitative information about childrenās development. It provides a basis for identifying children who would benefit from support, by creating a focus on carersā concerns and the childās development, and guides practitioners in making further appropriate assessments and investigations.
* From Birth to Five Years ā Childrenās Developmental Progress
The main components of this framework are:
A. Systematic enquiry of parents
i. eliciting concerns
ii. gathering information about the childās current abilities and function
iii. identifying risks and protective factors
B. Observations
i. generic observations
ii. structured domain-specific observations/examination of developmental abilities, using age appropriate methods.
A. SYSTEMATIC ENQUIRY
Gathering information from parents and carers is undoubtedly the most important aspect of evaluating development (Dooley et al. 2003). There are three main components of a systematic enquiry:
i. Eliciting concerns
Parents, for various reasons, may not always bring up all their concerns (Box 1) (Glascoe and Marks 2011). A sensitive and supportive approach, starting first with open-ended questions and then following with more specific questions, is always helpful (see Communicating with parents/carers, p. 125). Well-elicited and carefully interpreted parental concerns guide practitioners in deciding the focus of further detailed enquiry, judging the need for parental assurance and advice and/or further examination or referrals. The sensitivity and specificity of systemically elicited concerns is as good (70ā80 per cent) as standardised screening instruments for detecting developmental impairments (Glascoe 2003). Using a structured set of questions can elicit valid and useful responses (Table 2).
The significance of parental concerns changes with childrenās age. For example, concerns regarding general development, expressive language and social abilities are predictive of impairments at any age, while concerns regarding receptive language and motor function become more predictive of impairments after the age of 3 years (Tervo 2005). The relationship between parental concerns and the domain of impairment is not always direct: some concerns, such as poor language or social abilities, may also indicate global developmental delay or learning disability (Tervo 2005; Glascoe 1994). The onset and course of concerns, including any regression, should always be noted.
BOX 1 Barriers to parents raising concerns or accessing services
ā Lack of awareness of childrenās developmental progress and/or of local services and how they can help
ā Language barrier, social isolation
ā Emotional and behavioural problems may be seen by some parents as moral, rather than psychological, deviations because of cultural beliefs (Katz and Pinkerton 2003)
ā Parents living in poverty are more likely to be stressed and less likely to express concerns about their children (Elder et al. 1985)
ā Stigma of a label or being seen as a āfailed parentā
ā Lack of trust or suspicion
Table 2 Questions for eliciting concerns | Do you have any concer... |