In the following chapter you will develop an understanding of how law regulates nearly every aspect of social order within society and the impact it has upon the organisation and regulation of business activities. Whilst the English legal system is comprised of a rich tapestry of both common law and legislative legal rules, one of the biggest changes in recent times is the deregulation of the legal profession that interprets such rules. The Legal Services Act 2007 effectively introduced the concept of âalternative business structuresâ (ABS). The outcome being that for the first time in history law firms can operate with capital investment from non-legal investors. Many law firms are already inviting investment from non-lawyers and several brand names have entered the legal service marketplace. This has revolutionised the availability of legal advice to both the private and business sectors although not without criticism. Many argue that the quality of service and integrity of the legal profession will suffer. Students embarking on a study of business law should remain alert to how the changes work out as they will have considerable implications for business and commerce.
1.1 The nature of law
To a great extent, business activity across the world is carried on within a capitalist, market-based system. With regard to such a system, law provides and maintains an essential framework within which such business activity can take place, and without which it could not operate. In maintaining this framework, law establishes the rules and procedures for what is to be considered legitimate business activity and, as a corollary, what is not legitimate. It is essential, therefore, for the business person to be aware of the nature of the legal framework within which they have to operate. Even if they employ legal experts to deal with their legal problems, they will still need to be sufficiently knowledgeable to be able to recognise when to refer matters to those experts. It is the intention of this textbook to provide business students with an understanding of the most important aspects of law as they impinge on various aspects of business activity.
One of the most obvious and most central characteristics of all societies is that they must possess some degree of order, in order to permit their members to interact over a sustained period of time. Different societies, however, have different forms of order. Some societies are highly regimented with strictly enforced social rules, whereas others continue to function in what outsiders might consider a very unstructured manner, with apparently few strict rules being enforced.
Order is, therefore, necessary, but the form through which order is maintained is certainly not universal, as many anthropological studies have shown (see Mansell W, A Critical Introduction to Law, 2015).
In our society, law plays an important part in the creation and maintenance of social order. We must be aware, however, that law as we know it is not the only means of creating order. Even in our society, order is not solely dependent on law, but also involves questions of a more general moral and political character. This book is not concerned with providing a general explanation of the form of order. It is concerned, more particularly, with describing and explaining the key institutional aspects of that particular form of order that is legal order.
The most obvious way in which law contributes to the maintenance of social order is the way in which it deals with disorder or conflict. This book, therefore, is particularly concerned with the institutions and procedures, both civil and criminal, through which law operates to ensure a particular form of social order by dealing with various conflicts when they arise. Law is a formal mechanism of social control and, as such, it is essential that the student of law is fully aware of the nature of that formal structure. There are, however, other aspects to law that are less immediately apparent but of no less importance, such as the inescapably political nature of law. Some textbooks focus more on this particular aspect of law than others and these differences become evident in the particular approach adopted by the authors. The approach favoured by the authors of this book is to recognise that studying English law is not just about learning legal rules; it is also about considering a social institution of fundamental importance.
There is an ongoing debate about the relationship between law and morality and as to what exactly that relationship is or should be. Should all laws accord with a moral code, and, if so, which one? Can laws be detached from moral arguments? Many of the issues in this debate are implicit in much of what follows in the text, but the authors believe that, in spite of claims to the contrary, there is no simple causal relationship of dependency or determination, either way, between morality and law. We would rather approach both morality and law as ideological, in that they are manifestations of, and seek to explain and justify, particular social and economic relationships. This essentially materialist approach, to a degree, explains the tensions between the competing ideologies of law and morality and explains why they sometimes conflict and why they change, albeit asynchronously, as underlying social relations change.
1.2 Categories of law
There are various ways of categorising law, which initially tends to confuse the non-lawyer and the new student of law. What follows will set out these categorisations in their usual dual form whilst, at the same time, trying to overcome the confusion inherent in such duality. It is impossible to avoid the confusing repetition of the same terms to mean different things and, indeed, the purpose of this section is to make sure that students are aware of the fact that the same words can have different meanings, depending upon the context in which they are used.
1.2.1 Common law and civil law
In this particular juxtaposition, these terms are used to distinguish two distinct legal systems and approaches to law. The use of the term âcommon lawâ in this context refers to all those legal systems that have adopted the historic English legal system. Foremost amongst these is, of course, the US, but many other Commonwealth and former Commonwealth countries retain a common law system. The term âcivil lawâ refers to those other jurisdictions that have adopted the European continental system of law, which is derived essentially from ancient Roman law but owes much to the Germanic tradition.
The usual distinction to be made between the two systems is that the former, the common law system, tends to be case centred and, hence, judge centred, allowing scope for a discretionary, ad hoc, pragmatic approach to the particular problems that appear before the courts, whereas the latter, the civil law system, tends to be a codified body of general abstract principles that control the exercise of judicial discretion. In reality, both of these views are extremes, with the former overemphasising the extent to which the common law ...