CHAPTER
1
Examining Assumptions in Questions
All advice about how to write essays urges you to read the question, but what does read the question really mean? Skimming isn’t enough. You need to take your time. Define the key concepts, think about how they relate to one another and root out any assumptions the question is making. ‘Read the question’ means read the question critically – that is, actively evaluate the question and come to an informed judgement about it.
Reading the question involves spending enough time working out what the question is really asking you to do, instead of leaping in with a response prematurely. I expect you know this already. I am sure you also know that you must define the main terms of the question. In my experience, university students – including very clever ones – already know what they need to do in general but don’t always apply what they know to their own work. It is one thing to know these things in the abstract but quite another to put them into practice. This chapter provides some techniques to help you to read the question critically.
Finding an assumption lurking beneath the surface
One way to read the question critically is to consider whether the question contains any underlying assumptions: propositions that are accepted without proof, hidden in the background, and that may not be immediately obvious to the casual reader. Exposing those assumptions and examining them explicitly can help turn a so-so essay into a brilliant one. It can be an exciting intellectual exercise and an excellent way to read a question critically.
Rooting out these underlying statements starts with something called implicature. Implicature is a proposition that is implied by a question or statement but not stated explicitly. Don’t be disturbed by the fancy word; implicature is all around us in everyday speech. For instance, if I were to ask you:
Does Emma still work as reptile keeper at the zoo?
The word still indicates an underlying implication. In other words, this question is based on an assumption.
Assumption: Emma used to work as reptile keeper at the zoo.
When we use the word ‘still’ in English, we imply that at some point in the past Emma did indeed work as reptile keeper at the zoo and perhaps that her service in that role has been continuous. The question at hand is whether or not she does so now. The answer to the question will be either ‘yes’ or ‘no’ but – additionally and entirely separately – that underlying assumption may or may not be true. Since I am using the word ‘still’, the chances are that we both know that assumption is correct. But if I am wrong, then it might be a good idea to correct that assumption.
Correcting the assumption: You are confusing Emma with Anna. Emma is a primatologist. She has never worked with reptiles. In fact, she hates them.
Another way to correct the assumption: Emma is trainee reptile keeper, but she got the job yesterday so she hasn’t been doing it long. She’s only just started.
The assumption arises as a result of a single word. If I had simply asked you (note the missing word):
Does Emma work as reptile keeper at the zoo?
Without the word ‘still’ in the question, there is no assumption about whether or not Emma has ever been a reptile keeper before. The focus is solely on the present.
Similarly, implicature can arise if I use the word ‘too’ or ‘also’. I could ask you:
Is Ben also a vegetarian?
There is a surface question here – I am asking if Ben is a vegetarian or not – but there is also an assumption (or several) underlying the question.
Assumption: Somebody else (probably someone we both know) is a vegetarian.
Or: There is at least one other vegetarian.
Or: You are a vegetarian.
These assumptions may or may not be true, and the precise nature of the assumption is usually clear from the context of utterance. If I come up to you while you’re loading your plate with tofu and ask:
Is your brother a vegetarian too?
Then, in addition to asking you a question about your brother, I have probably also implied that you are a vegetarian. Perhaps you’re not. Perhaps you are a carnivore who happens to enjoy coagulated soy milk.
Although we don’t often think about it explicitly, everyday speech is riddled with implicature. For instance, if I say ‘the problem with the cat is that it doesn’t know how to use the cat flap’, then my use of the definite article (‘the’) implies that there is just one problem and one cat and one cat flap. If we had several cats, I would most likely have identified it by name (Felix) or description (our fattest cat).
Typically, people converse politely and reasonably, so it is rare to spot an incorrect assumption. It might seem rude to interrupt the flow of the conversation to inform someone they have a faulty assumption; anyway, we can usually be confident that they are correct. In academic essays, however, the best stance is friendly but informed scepticism: start with an open mind and a willingness to question what you are being told, both explicitly and implicitly.
Implicatures such as the ones above often come up in essay questions too, so paying close attention to the wording of the question can help you to assess the question critically. For instance, you might be asked:
Do presidential election debates still matter?
Recall the implicature ‘still’ in the question: Does Emma still work as reptile keeper at the zoo? This question implies that presidential election debates used to matter, and it is asking you whether or not they matter now.
Assumption: Presidential election debates used to matter.
In other words, the question is: Do presidential election debates matter now?
Weaker answers to this question would ignore the assumption and simply list the ways in which presidential election debates do or do not ‘matter’. But the assumption underlying the question may be true or false, depending upon what is meant by ‘matter’ (Matter to whom? Matter in what way?) and the scope conditions of the argument (that is, its empirical boundaries). In this case, the conditions are temporal parameters (What period of time are we talking about? Televised presidential election debates started in 1960: how and when did they change? How far back in time does ‘now’ stretch?)
A cleverer approach would be to consider whether the assumption is true or not when responding to the question at hand. If the assumption is false, you should correct it.
One way to correct the assumption and answer ...