1.2 An overview of honour
Honour can, in general terms, be defined as āa virtue or character trait associated with integrity, good moral character and altruism.ā1 The phenomenon of honour is said to be a symbolic and rhetorical construct which āencompasses not only a personās estimation of their own worth, but also the acknowledgement of that claim by their community through the recognition of their right to respect. Thus, honour often has multiple connotations and overlapping meanings related to pride, esteem, dignity, reputation and virtue.ā2
1 A K Gill, āIntroduction: āHonourā and āHonourā Based Violence: Challenging Common Assumptionsā in A K Gill et al. (eds)āHonourā Killing & Violence (Palgrave MacMillan 2014) 1.
2 Ibid. 2.
Another definition of honour which highlights the gendered dimension of the concept is a value system with associated norms and traditions3 where āthe ideal of masculinity is underpinned by a notion of āhonourā ā of an individual man, or a family or a community ā and is fundamentally connected to policing female behaviour and sexuality.ā4 Honour is seen as residing specifically in the bodies of women.5 As a result of this belief, violations and abuses are taking place in certain communities throughout the world.6
3 A K Gill et al., āāHonourā-Based Violence in Kurdish Communitiesā (2012) 35 Womenās Studies International Forum 75.
4 R Coomaraswamy, āViolence against Women and āCrimes of Honourāā in L Welchman and S Hossain (eds) āHonourā Crimes, Paradigms and Violence against Women (Zed Books Ltd 2005) preface xi.
5 Ibid.
6 UNFPA, āThe State of World Population the State of World Population,ā (2000) <www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2000/swp2000_eng.pdf> accessed 11/9/2018 pp 29ā30; R Coomaraswamy, āāViolence against Women and āCrimes of Honourā in L Welchman and S Hossain (eds) āHonourā Crimes, Paradigms and Violence Against Women (Zed Books Ltd 2005) preface xii.
When conceptualising honour, it is important to mention the parallel notion of shame. Individuals in honour based patriarchal communities are not only motivated by a desire to obtain and maintain honour, but likewise to avoid shame.7 āThus, honour relates to the behaviour expected of male members of a particular community, while female shame is associated with transgressions against these expectations.ā8 Honour is therefore constructed through these dual notions, whereby a maleās self-worth and social worth are tied to the reputation and social conduct of the female members of his family and community.9 In honour based patriarchal communities, the quality required of women in regard to honour is not to bring āshameā, particularly sexual shame.10 Menās duty is to uphold their family and social groupās honour by, amongst other things, making sure their women and girls do not bring shame upon them. As a result, discussing honour without mentioning patriarchy will not allow for a proper understanding of honour based violence against women.
7 A K Gill, āIntroduction: āHonourā and āHonourā-Based Violence: Challenging Common Assumptionsā in A K Gill et al. (eds) āHonourā Killing & Violence (Palgrave MacMillan 2014) 2.
8 Ibid.
9 R Reddy, āDomestic Violence or Cultural Tradition? Approaches to āHonour Killingā as Species and Subspecies in English Legal Practiceā in A K Gill et al. (eds) āHonourā Killing & Violence (Palgrave MacMillan 2014) 29.
10 A H Jafri, Honour Killing (Oxford University Press 2008) 20.
From the point of view of an honour based patriarchal set of values, there are different expectations of behaviour from women and men. This expected behaviour is mainly related to sexuality, and it includes acts done to and by the individual. The evolution of the nature of honour will then be analysed as patriarchal values developed over the history of civilisations, reaching a point today when this patriarchal conception of honour appears to have its own independent value, hiding the original motives from which it emerged: the role of women in sedentary societies and the increased relevance of individual property in early civilisations.
According to Jafri, āHonour concepts are only another way of understanding the operation of patriarchy, which is anchored in the assumption of male authority over women and male definition and expectation of āappropriateā female behaviour.ā11 Furthermore, according to Kandiyoti, femininity is an ascribed status whereas masculinity is something achieved. Masculinity is seen as a process, something that can never be permanently achieved because the danger of being un-manned is always present, via, for instance, female misbehaviour. Thus, maintaining and proving oneās masculinity is a constant preoccupation.12
11 Ibid. 21.
12 D Kandiyoti, āEmancipated but Unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish Caseā (Summer 1987) 13(2) Feminist Studies 326ā327.
Since the notion of a manās honour depends on the behaviour of others (i.e. female members of the family or close social groups) then that behaviour must be controlled.13 From this logic it follows that āother peopleās behaviour becomes a key component of oneās own self-esteem and communityās regard. It is important to note that this view is different from saying it should be the individualās own behaviour which should be linked with his or her honour.ā14 Under the honour based patriarchal system, women contain the honour of men. Thus,
13 N V Baker et al., āFamily Killing Fields: Honour Rationales in the Murder of Womenā (1999) 5(2) Violence against Women 165.
14 A H Jafri, Honour Killing (Oxford University Press 2008) 20.
she may be perceived to be a mere vessel for this male āhonour,ā and the chattel of the male āownerā of that āhonourā ⦠[c]oncepts of male āhonourā and female āshameā and the required chastity and passivity of women, arguably pave the way for the idea that women are property of their male relatives, passing from the control of their father to that of their husband via the social institution of marriage.15
15 R Reddy, āDomestic Violence or Cultural Tradition? Approaches to āHonour Killingā as Species and Subspecies in English Legal Practiceā in A K Gill et al. (eds) āHonourā Killing & Violence (Palgrave MacMillan 2014) 29.
Honour crimes are triggered by actual or alleged acts, specifically acts that are seen as dishonourable. As well as being actual or alleged, these may be voluntarily undertaken by women, such as exercising sexual autonomy outside marriage or seeking a divorce, or they may be involuntary, such as becoming a victim of rape. For instance, when a woman or girl is raped, she is likely to become the victim of an honour crime (either she is killed or forced to marry her rapist). The issue here is that although the wrong act is the rape itself, and so the rapist should be the one to be blamed, in honour based patriarchal communities the liability is completely shifted onto the female. Since women are treated and perceived as the property of men, through the alleged or actual incident (such as rape), the value of her as property is diminished (i.e. she is not worth keeping in the family any longer). As such, it is perceived that the family honour is tarnished, rather than the womanās self-dignity and autonomy. This example shows that both actual and alleged acts, and those undertaken voluntarily or involuntarily, concern honour as long as they are related to female sexuality. It does not matter whether they are triggered by the victimās own free will, such as seeking a divorce, or if the action is forcibly inflicted upon her, such as through rape.
The usage of the term āhonour crimesā has created academic division. Welchman and Hossain acknowledge that the definition and use of the term āhonour crimesā is not straightforward. The word āhonourā traditionally has positive connotations. The term is also used to flag a type of violation against women and girls, thus it is ācharacterised by āmotivationā rather than by perpetrator or manifestation.ā16
16 L Welchman and S Hossain, āIntroduction: āHonourā, Rights and Wrongsā in L Welchman and S Hossain (eds) āHonourā Crimes, Paradigms and Violence Against Women (Zed Books Ltd 2005)...