General Erich Hoepner

A Military Biography

Chales de Beaulieu, Linden Lyons

• Publisher: Casemate
• Year: 2021
• ISBN:
  9781612009773
• Topic: History
• Subtopic: Military Biographies
• Index: History

Written by Hoepner's chief of staff on the Eastern Front, this military biography of the German WWII general is available in English for the first time. This biography of Erich Hoepner was written by Walter Chales de Beaulieu, a general staff officer who fought alongside him. It examines his leadership of panzer formations in Poland in 1939, France in 1940, and Russia in 1941. Hoepner was one of the most competent tank commanders of World War II, playing a significant role in Germany's early successes. As the commander of the XVI Panzer Corps in 1939, Hoepner carried out the main thrust towards Warsaw, reaching the outskirts of the city in only eight days. With the same formation, he fought the French Cavalry Corps in Belgium, partook in the encirclement of Allied forces near Dunkirk, and advanced southwards over the Weygand Line deep into French territory. In 1941, Hoepner became the commander of Panzer Group 4, the main attack formation for the advance on Leningrad. In this book, Walter Chales de Beaulieu provides insight into Erich Hoepner's ability as a panzer commander, painting a picture of a man who was committed to the military profession.

CHAPTER 1

The Campaign in Poland in 1939

(a)Introduction

The military leader Erich Hoepner became well-known on 8 September 1939 when the formation under his command, the XVI Panzer Corps, stood before Warsaw only eight days after the outbreak of war with Poland. The panzer corps had covered the 250-kilometre distance from German Upper Silesia in this short time, and had crushed any resistance that had been put up against it. Yet the surprisingly rapid military thrust represented only the beginning of the destruction of the bulk of the Polish Army to the west of the Vistula, the first operational objective that had been set by the High Command of the German Army (OKH). This objective now had good prospects of being able to be achieved, but it would still require time to be carried out. The swift advance on the enemy capital was also a great success from the point of view of foreign policy. It revealed to the world the military weakness of Poland and rendered impossible any active assistance from its allies, if any such assistance had ever truly been intended. Despite the declaration of war by the Western Powers, it now seemed as if the fighting could be restricted to the Polish zone, thereby preventing its expansion into a second world war.

The extent of the astonishment of the outside world at that time at the rapid appearance of German tanks before Warsaw is difficult to assess in detail. At the very least, the success of the German panzer arm received a great deal of attention in the press. The operational capabilities of a modern, independent panzer arm had been demonstrated most clearly for the first time.

Before World War II, there had been a lively and ongoing critical debate over the value of armour, its ability to be employed, the way in which it should be equipped and led, and even its right to exist at all, especially in the countries that had at first been so intensely interested in their development, England and France. However, there had been few practical results from which lessons could be drawn. France had created large armoured formations even before Germany had done so. Specifically, these were two motorised or mechanised divisions, but it was envisioned that their independent use would be limited. England also possessed small and well-trained armoured units. But only Germany had striven to create an independent panzer arm on a large scale, one that would have an impact on the realm of operations, and it was in October 1935 that the first three panzer divisions were united under a single command. They were outfitted and trained for long-range thrusts and for mobility on the battlefield. By the beginning of World War II, they were superior to their opponents in the East and West due to their ability to fight with greater manoeuvrability. Nevertheless, German tanks still exhibited a number of defects at the start of the war, so it would be inaccurate to speak of German matériel superiority. What compensated for this was the mobility of the panzer divisions and the concentration of those divisions against a point of main effort.

The reputation of the superiority of the German panzer arm that arose at that time was based on this rapid advance by the XVI Panzer Corps towards Warsaw, as well as on the simultaneous, albeit slightly less deep, thrust of the XIX Panzer Corps through the Polish Corridor towards East Prussia. Surprise successes like these would become the hallmark of the new and fast motorised combat arm. However, these panzer formations had fought through enemy forces that were mostly no match for them. It was the battle of encirclement near Radom that was conducted by the XIV and XV Panzer Corps, as well as the achievements of the motorised arm on the outer wings, in the south by Army Group South, and in the east (Brest-Litovsk) by Army Group North, that secured the everlasting reputation of the panzer arm. Despite the ups and downs in its development, the panzer arm had been tremendously successful during the campaign in Poland in 1939! Unfortunately, as the war progressed, there was a growing tendency on the German side to overestimate the abilities of the new arm and to place overwhelming demands upon it. Although decisive when employed correctly, the effectiveness of the panzer formations in combat was dependent on several preconditions.

This observation touches on a matter that was important at that time: knowledge and mastery of the panzer arm. The fact that this arm was brand new in the years leading up to World War II should be emphasised most strongly. The creation of the first three panzer divisions in the autumn of 1935 has already been mentioned. Light divisions and motorised infantry divisions were created shortly afterwards. At the outbreak of war, the oldest panzer divisions were barely four years old, and the others were much newer. This was one of the reasons why the military leadership was strongly opposed to any military conflict! All of the elements of the motorised divisions were at that time described as ‘mobile troops’, with the term ‘panzer arm’ only arising at a later stage. The latter term will nevertheless be used here, for it was quite distinct from the bulk of the forces of the army that marched on foot, i.e. the infantry. The principles of the conduct of battle of the infantry were considerably different to those of the panzer arm.

The details of the development of the panzer arm, of the manner in which it was led in combat, and of the way in which its tactics contrasted to the prevailing, and proven, tactics of the infantry cannot be examined here. Such details, whether theoretical or practical, will only be considered to the degree that they are relevant to the operations conducted by General Hoepner. As the Old Cavalryman, the desire for modern heavy cavalry was in his blood, be it through replacing or supplementing the horse with the motor.1 The high ratio of cavalry allowed by the Treaty of Versailles in relation to the infantry (three cavalry divisions for every seven infantry divisions) compelled him to think about their modernisation, for they would otherwise possess too little value in combat. In the 1920s, when he was still a cavalry captain on the general staff, Hoepner paid close attention to the question of a modern panzer arm. He belonged to the unfortunately rather few of those in the interwar period who gave careful consideration as to how the small 100,000-man army that had been imposed by the Treaty of Versailles could be turned into a modern, manoeuvrable defensive instrument that would be capable of resisting its superior neighbours in the east, west, and south. Hoepner’s efforts to develop a German panzer arm are to be seen and understood from this point of view. The creation of independent panzer formations, from panzer divisions to panzer armies, was the centre of attention from the outset. General Hoepner was proud of the fact that he had been able to play a substantial role in the development of the panzer arm. It was under his command that a large panzer formation was utilised for the first time in March 1939. The result was the decisive occupation of Prague. It was therefore no coincidence that the panzer corps under the command of General Hoepner was assigned an important objective for the campaign in Poland.

(b)The task of the XVI Panzer Corps in the operational plan

1.The objectives of the operational plan of the OKH

According to the plan of the OKH, the outcome of the campaign in Poland was to be decided near Warsaw. The assumption was that the bulk of the Polish armed forces would conduct the defence of their country to the west of the Vistula. The OKH expected that the leadership of the Polish Army would not follow the recommendation that had been made by French General Maxime Weygand in the 1920s that the defence of the country be carried out behind the Narew and the Vistula.2 Given the political situation, the Polish national character, and the personality of Marshal Edward Rydz-Śmigły, it was unlikely that so much Polish territory would be relinquished without a fight. Any Polish defensive forces placed too far to the west, in the area of the Warta, could therefore be enveloped by German attack forces from the geopolitically favourable flanks that were Upper Silesia and East Prussia. On top of its geographically disadvantageous position, Poland would have to deal with an enemy whose forces were superior to its own. It could not be assessed to what extent Poland had already factored the German panzer arm into its considerations. Germany was counting on the panzer arm for a successful outcome, even if the surprising rapidity of the advance had not been foreseen.

The OKH decided that the objective of the first phase of the operation would be Warsaw, so that the possibility of a pincer attack against any Polish forces to the west of the Vistula could be fully exploited. If Poland concentrated most of its forces west of the river, this part of the campaign might prove to be decisive. Not only would it be a military success; it would also be a political one with the seizure of the enemy capital.

Two army groups were earmarked by the OKH for the execution of the operation: Army Group North and Army Group South. The main thrust in the area of Army Group North would be launched by the Third Army from East Prussia in the direction of Warsaw. To take place before this, though, would be an advance through the Polish Corridor from the west so as to connect East Prussia with the rest of the Reich. There was a chance that this plan would change over time. Much would depend on the progress made by the XIX Panzer Corps in its advance through the corridor. While Army Group North would conduct its two-stage advance on the left flank with the possibility of subsequently extending it eastwards, perhaps even as far as Brest-Litovsk, Army Group South would carry out the main attack of the entire operation by driving directly towards Warsaw from Upper Silesia. This attack would run roughly along the major road that led from Częstochowa to the capital. If it succeeded, the bulk of the most quickly organised, and probably most combat-capable, Polish divisions would be encircled. The preliminary phase of the campaign could then quite possibly be the most decisive one.

For Army Group South, the right pincer, the point of main effort would clearly lie in the direction of Warsaw. The strongest panzer forces at the disposal of the OKH were to be concentrated under the command of the Tenth Army and applied against this objective. Two panzer divisions, three light divisions, and two motorised infantry divisions were to comprise the XIV, XV, and XVI Panzer Corps. This was effectively the first panzer army to have ever appeared in the history of military operations. For support and security, the Tenth Army would also be assigned two infantry corps. These were the IV and XI Army Corps, which made a total of six infantry divisions. The northern flank of the advancing panzer army would be protected by the Eighth Army, for it was there that the most sustained enemy resistance was anticipated. The Eighth Army had four infantry divisions under its command and another two in its rear area under the direct control of the army group. On the southern flank, opposite Polish Upper Silesia and Kraków, the Fourteenth Army assembled in the Carpathian Mountains. It was equipped with relatively strong forces (five infantry divisions, three mountain divisions, two panzer divisions, and one light division) due to the rather extensive border there. It was not assigned a specific task by the OKH at that stage. It could therefore choose the direction of its advance, provided that its northern neighbour could remain committed to the drive on Warsaw. In the event of an attempt by the Poles to fall back behind the Vistula, the role of the Fourteenth Army would become clearer. With a quick eastward advance through Galicia over the San, the Fourteenth Army could either prevent a retreat by the enemy to the south towards Romania or support the Tenth Army in crossing the large obstacle that was the Vistula. As will be seen, the army group, more so than the OKH, strongly favoured an early advance by the Fourteenth Army in this direction in any case. What was most important was the ability to recognise and evaluate the reaction of the enemy after the first few days of the campaign. The development of the situation would either confirm or disprove our assumptions about what he would do.

Further details will not be considered here. The focus will predominantly be on the actions of the XVI Panzer Corps, the spearhead of the Tenth Army.

2.The organisation of Polish forces

In hindsight, the way in which the Polish forces were organised is astonishing. Enemy formations seemed to stand along or just behind the entire length of the western and northern borders, a stretch of more than 1,300 kilometres. Armies Pomorze, Poznań, Łódź, Kraków, and Karpaty secured the western and southern frontiers, while Armies Pomorze and Modlin, as well as Independent Operational Group Narew, covered the border with East Prussia.3 Behind these formations were a main reserve on either side of the Pilica, near Tomaszów, and a smaller one between the Narew and the Bug. The preparation of the border forces had generally made headway. The reserve forces were just being organised by the time the war began. If a line were to be drawn from the area south of Oppeln (in Upper Silesia) to Warsaw, and another from the area east of Allenstein (in East Prussia) to the Polish capital, the mass of the Polish Army would be found between these lines. The OKH could not be entirely sure of the disposition of the Polish forces at that time, but it was nevertheless well-informed. Yet the Poles also had a good idea of the way in which German forces were assembled.

Colonel-General Erich Hoepner

Colonel-General Erich Hoepner, with General Georg-Hans Reinhardt behind.

As stated, a defensive position behind the Narew and the Vistula did not appear to be the intention of the Polish leadership. It seemed that the enemy planned to defend the country along a line that ran behind the lower Vistula downstream from Bydgoszcz, southwards through the area of marshes and lakes of the upper Noteć, and then from the vicinity of Koło along the upper Warta. Why, then, was the entirety of the powerful Army Poznań placed to the west of this line, roughly near the city of Poznań? The Polish leadership was aware that there were barely any German forces next to the border there. A similar picture is to be found along the rest of the frontier. He who defends everything defends nothing!4 This situation could only be an advantage to the OKH. There must have been many political considerations that Marshal Rydz-Śmigły was pinning his hopes on that informed the way in which the Polish forces were positioned. This is because, from a military perspective, the Polish deployment in the autumn of 1939 did not fulfil what was needed or possible for conducting a pure defence. Judging from some of his remarks and from his reliance on English guarantees, it can be assumed that Marshal Rydz-Śmigły had decided by early 1939 that a military conflict was inevitable and that the positioning of strong Polish forces far to the west would enable an advance into the German Reich in conjunction with an attack by the Western Powers from the other side. He had yet to recognise that he had misunderstood the military situation on both sides. Although the Polish Army was relatively strong at that stage, the geopolitical position was disadvantageous for Poland. Moreover, the 100,000-man German Army of the Weimar period had in the meantime been reinforced significantly. The Polish national character was inclined towards the offensive rather than the defensive, and the Polish leadership had given in to this. If Poland were indeed to conduct an attack, then East Prussia would have been its best objective. This was something that had been feared in Germany in the 1920s! It would have been easy for the southern part of East Prussia to be taken in a pincer attack. In such an operation, the Poles would have had to adopt a defensive position everywhere else, with the Vistula ultimately being the main line of resistance. What needed to prevail in Poland if it were to have any chance of success at all was a clear political and military will in combination with self-restraint. Instead, the Poles at that time were filled with ambivalence, and that was demonstrated in thought and action, as well as in political and military events.

3.The task of the XVI Panzer Corps

The spearhead of the planned thrust towards the main operational objective, Warsaw, would be formed by both panzer divisions that were available to the Tenth Army. These were the 1st and 4th Panzer Divisions, directly under the command of the XVI Panzer Corps. Before the war, this panzer corps had been entrusted with overseeing the development of the panzer divisions. General of Cavalry Hoepner had been its commander since November 1938. The task that he was assigned was one whose theory he had committed himself to for a very long time: employing the panzer arm as a large and independent formation to conduct a deep operational envelopment. In this case, the distant objective was the capital city of Poland.

The penetration of the first line of the enemy defence was the prerequisite for the deep thrust envisioned by the OKH. It could not be predicted whether this penetration would take place swiftly or whether it would be delayed by enemy resistance. We had no prior experience with the use of armour. However, the OKH was counting on a rapid success. According to the war diary of the chief of the general staff of the German Army, General of Artillery Franz Halder, in August 1939: ‘It must be clear to the world in 8 to 14 days that Poland is in danger of collapsing.’ These words were written down with the possible reaction of England in mind. He was of the view that a rapid military success would discourage Poland’s indecisive allies from intervening and that, as a result, it would be possible to prevent the expansion of the conflict into a global conflagration. A quick victory in Poland would be a political shock for England. ‘The operations themselves can of course take longer,’ concluded Halder. ‘Up to eight weeks.’

After the infantry had broken through the front, the panzer corps of Hoepner was to drive directly towards Warsaw. To ensure that its full striking power could be committed to overcoming the 250-kilometre stretch, its rear flanks were to be protected by the other two panzer corps against any counter-attack that might be carried out by the retreating Polish forces. The intended line of attack of the XVI Panzer Corps would be along the Częstochowa–Piotrków–Tomaszów–Rawa–Warsaw road. This would also be the main supply road of the panzer corps. It should be noted in this regard that panzer units are far more dependent on lines of supply than...