The intention of this chapter is to offer the reader a useful starting point to understanding the significance that continuing professional development (CPD) plays in the career of the construction professional. Contemporary issues in construction professional development within the built environment are explored, and the benefits as advocated by professional institutions and organisations are identified. Key stages of CPD are shown and approaches to CPD activities provide useful primer to those readers wishing to use CPD in the development of their own career path. Mentoring and peer learning is highlighted as a helpful tool for identifying skills gaps and gaining knowledge. Critical thinking is identified as one of the key pivotal elements needed when determining the appropriate professional development needs.
1.1.1 History of continuing professional development
CPD, or as it is sometimes called continuing professional development, has its roots in the term âprofessional developmentâ which relates to a personâs work. Professionals such as senior managers, doctors, teachers, and legal experts all take part in professional development activities in order to apply these newfound skills and knowledge in their place of work that will contribute to improved performance.
Research and development in the field of professional development has been around for over 150 years and focused mainly in the education sectors. The term âcontinuous improvementâ gained prominence in post-war 1950s which saw the reconstruction of large economies such as the likes of Japanâs automotive manufacturer Toyota. The company implement a concept known as âKaizenâ in its production process. The meaning of Kaizen is âimprovementâ or âcontinuously improveâ. Known as continual improvement process (CIP), this is an ongoing iterative effort to improve the system or process for an improved product or service.
The 1960sâ1980s saw steps in the development of organisation implementing training/learning and professional development. Authors such as W.E. Deeming on Quality System in manufacturing processes and other research reports, for example, from the construction sector such as âContinuing professional development for Architects: Report on a research studyâ by Richard Gardner et al. (1981) brought the concept of CPD to most professions.
CPD much like Kaizenâs link to CIP embraces in-service or on-the-job training beyond any baseline training initially expected to carry out a job role. In quality systems, feedback for process improvement would help enhance the system much like the case of professional improvement; reflective feedback would help to improve ways of working.
Simply put modern CPD refers to the identification of a skills/experience or knowledge gap in oneâs profession, recording the training activity after the event and reflecting on its application. An activity log is kept and continually update as required. CPD is a process and will continue throughout the oneâs career and supports lifelong learning.
The key steps are as follows:
-
Identify the gap in your knowledge, skills, or experience.
-
Find and attend a course or activity that will fill the gap.
-
Record the event.
-
Apply the knowledge, skills, or experience gained.
-
Reflect on the learning and development.
-
Repeat.
As with quality systems feedback (reflection) feeds back into to step 1 to start the continuous improvement process again.
A point to note here is regarding step 4 âapply the knowledgeâ. If you are unable to apply what has been learnt, then the previous three steps will have been a waste of time and money for you and, if paid for by your employers, the organisation.
To illustrate why step 4 is so critical, consider this anecdote:
A Building Surveyor may identify a gap in knowledge in understanding Sustainable Draining Systems (SUDS) a more environmentally friendly approach to managing drainage in and around properties. The surveyor identifies a 2 day course, enrols, and completes it gaining a successful completion certificate. As a member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the surveyor records the event in their RICS CPD log. However, the surveyor does not get the chance to use this new knowledge in any future work. You could reasonably conclude then that this event has been a waste of time for the surveyor and the knowledge had no tangible merit in their professional development.
However, on further reflection the course could have had merit in some other less-tangible way such as team building skills if the course happened to have used working in teams as part of the course delivery mechanism. Subsequently for step 4 the surveyor could apply the knowledge, skill gained on the course it just happened to be in teambuilding on a challenging new project not in using SUDS knowledge.
It is important to recognise in step 1 that there must be a genuine need to fill a gap in knowledge and for improvement to occur, not simply improvement for improvements sake or attending a course for attendance sake.