Mindset
Letās begin with the exploration of research linked to mindset as a way to begin framing a component of the basis of this research study related to facet-based perceptions. Young people often develop a fixed or growth mindset beginning at an early age through interactions with parents, teachers, mentors, or other influential figures (Dweck, 2006). A fixed mindset is a focus on proving oneself in education, career, and personal relationships; at its root is the belief that each person has a certain personality type, level of intelligence, and moral character. Counter to the fixed mindset, the growth mindset identifies the basic qualities of intelligence, personality type, and moral character as a starting point from which to change, grow, and strive toward goals (Dweck, 2006). These opposing mindset perspectives have the potential to frame our approach to individual tasks, roles within our current job, willingness to take risks, attitude toward mistakes, and ability to personally and professional grow and develop. As leaders it may be beneficial to identify the values, beliefs, and work environment, specifically considering whether fixed or growth mindset is the basis for evaluation, mentoring, and completion of job duties. The research facets examined in the outlined study may offer a relevant opportunity to consider how mindset may factor into the work environment, with the potential to promote personal and professional growth, or alternatively inhibit creativity and optimal work performance.
Dweck (2006) suggested that humans have an innate love of learning. Yet, a personās motivation and mindset develop continually, changing with lifeās exposures, experiences, and opportunities to learn. Career opportunities and job facets are linked to these various exposures, ongoing experiences, and distinct learning opportunities that may shape an individualās motivation and mindset. Indeed, researchers may consider intrinsic and extrinsic motivation when studying the relationships between job satisfaction and various facets of a specific job. Both intrinsic drive and extrinsic motivation determine how individual interests, goals, and career path choices feed the innate human need for autonomy, self-determination, and connectedness (Pink, 2009).
It may prove valuable in studying job satisfaction to identify the ways growth mindset may offer opportunities to strive and grow based on flexibility, adaptability, and willingness to succeed and learn in the midst of perceived failure. Excitement and growth have the potential to offer opportunities for positive perceptions linked to needed flexibility and adaptability within a career path or specific job situation. Indeed, human nature drives an innate curiosity and need for self-direction. Because individuals are driven to find a path resulting in improvement of their life, having autonomy to make individual choices improves overall well-being (Pink, 2009). In considering the continuous evolving speech-language pathology roles and responsibilities, as well as the breadth and depth of the speech-language pathology field, there is an ongoing need for flexibility, adaptation, and willingness to grow, grounded in the study, research, and understanding of the implications of a growth mindset.
Public schools in Indiana struggle to recruit and retain speech-language pathologists. High caseload numbers, increased workload, and growing responsibilities are contributing to speech-language pathologist stress and burnout (Coordinating Committee of the Vice President for Speech-Language Pathology Practice, 2009). Because of diverse work environments and job aspects, speech-language pathologists respond to various intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, which influence their career trajectory, work setting choices, and retention of speech-language pathologists at various stages of their career paths. Speech and language skills correlate closely to academic success and achievement, highlighting the importance of the speech-language pathologistās role in the educational environment. Yet, the demands on speech-language pathologists continue to increase without solutions for preventing burnout and promoting job satisfaction. Woltmann and Camron (2009) stated that the speech-language pathologist shortages in school-based settings, primarily resulting from large caseloads and increased paperwork requirements, can result in underserved students in need of speech and language evaluation and intervention. It is important to consider the impact of this shortage of speech-language pathologists on needed student support, as well as the systemic educational need for speech and language expertise on school teams. Public school-based speech-language pathologists have experienced an increased need for flexibility, adaptation, management of expanding job responsibilities, and role adjustments as the field continues to evolve and the scope of practice grows. School district leaders face the challenge of recruiting and retaining public school-based speech-language pathologists in a competitive market. The field has evolved to include working with a diverse population and addressing a multitude of disorders and impairments in a variety of settings. Multiple opportunities and career decisions exist, including the selection of audiology or speech-language pathology, preferred client population and work setting, and desired employment facility (Leonard, Plexico, Plumb, & Sandage, 2016).
The field of speech-language pathology encompasses a comprehensive landscape of assessment and intervention, with a primary focus on supporting effective and functional communication. This monograph aims to explore the job satisfaction of school-based speech-language pathologists in the USA, through investigation of a focused, quantitative research study conducted in schools in Indiana and the accompanying analysis and synthesis of the associated research evidence. This monograph serves to offer insights in terms of how educational administration and speech-language pathologists can work collaboratively to better understand and find solutions to the needs for increased job satisfaction of the speech-language pathologists practicing in a field where demand now exceeds supply (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2019).
Few researchers have focused specifically on identifying how speech-language pathologists determine their career paths and job choices. Additionally, based on a review of the literature, researchers have not specifically focused investigation on job satisfaction in relation to specific job facets in the field of speech-language pathology. Few researchers have focused on public school-based speech-language pathologistsā job satisfaction, specifically studying facet-based job satisfaction. Limited facet-based job satisfaction data specific to Indiana speech-language pathologists have been collected based on literature review prior to this study. A detailed understanding of speech-language pathologistsā initial career decisions, the reasons for their subsequent employment choices, and the facets with the strongest correlation to job satisfaction can serve to inform employers about important recruitment, job satisfaction, and retention information to consider when developing and implementing recruitment and retention strategic plans.
Additional helpful research may include identifying the point when speech-language pathology students determine the path to follow and whether perceived facets of job satisfaction affect employee retention when new graduates transition into professional practice. Miller and Ciocci (2013) stated that new college students define academic focus areas, career, and clinical interests based on preferences, experiential opportunities, and job characteristics. The national need for speech-language pathologists in public schools, necessary for meeting the needs of eligible students, warrants research that may help increase job satisfaction, diminish burnout, and promote consistency and retention.
It may also be beneficial to explore career paths and preferences specific to the field of speech-language pathology. Although researchers have not extensively studied career path preferences of speech-language pathology students, I have gained insight into the decision-making process from studies involving medical students. Several factors may influence a studentās choice of medical specialty, including sociodemographic factors, individual characteristics, and environmental considerations (Nieman, Holbert, & Bremer, 1986). Additional primary factors include clinical experiences, student attitudes toward career opportunities, exposure to a specific employment environment, and the academic institutionās focus on research and clinical practice (Brooks, 1991). In addition to studies of medical students, general vocational theory is relevant to recruitment, hiring, and retention of speech-language pathologists in public-school settings.
We must also consider the overall structure, health, and vitality of an organization as a component of potential impact related to recruitment, retention, and the job satisfaction variable. Kramer, Brewer, and Maquire (2011) investigated the impact of healthy work settings on new graduatesā transitions into the professional practice within the field of nursing. Although the study encompasses only the field of nursing, it provides considerations for speech-language pathologists transitioning from academic training and preparation programs to professional clinical practice. In the field of nursing, the physical, social, and interaction aspects of the environment, as well as organizational structures and the values and actions of people, affect the transition from the academic setting to professional practice (Pearson et al., 2007). In studying the research, it seems the most effective way to master a new professional role is to undertake cooperative tasks with people in the work environment. In the field of speech-language pathology, these opportunities exist within the practicum clinical experiences, research opportunities, and clinical fellowship year experiences embedded to varying degrees within undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate programs and professional requirements.
Kramer and Schmalenberg (2002) described healthy work environments in the field of nursing as a system that involves interrelated components of people, organizational structures, and practices that allow nurses to provide quality patient care. Nursing graduates transitioning from academia to professional practice demonstrate high expectations for their first clinical professional practice work environment (Kramer et al., 2011). The new graduates expect a healthy work environment based on people, organizational structures, and practices to support high quality care, resulting in job satisfaction (Lacey et al., 2011). Kramer et al. (2011) suggested that a healthy work environment needs a foundation of strong leadership with collaboration to promote increased retention and productivity of nursing graduates transitioning into clinical practice. A need exists for similar studies of transitioning and veteran speech-language pathologists; however, perhaps we can gain relevant insight into expectations of new speech-language pathology graduates related to organizational structure and healthy work environment. As educational leaders, how might we support this transition of recent graduates from coursework and practicum into the professional realm of independent practice?