The Destiny of Me
A Play in Three Acts
About the Production
As with all plays, I hope there are many ways to design The Destiny of Me.
The original New York production turned out to be much more elaborate than Iād conceived it in my head as I wrote it. As I worked with the director, Marshall Mason, I began to fear Iād written an undesignable play (not that there should ever be such a thing!).
On The Normal Heart Iād had the talent of the enormously gifted Eugene Lee, ever adept at solving problems of this nature in miraculously ingenious ways, and ways that were not expensive. I suspect that Eugeneās design for The Normal Heartā-the way he solved not dissimilar problemsāhas been utilized unknowingly all over the world, just from the participants in one production seeing photographs of another.
This time, and it was also a great gift, I had the opportunity to work with John Lee Beatty, whoād designed many of Marshallās other productions. John Lee is another kind of theatrical genius, as obsessed with minute details as Eugene is off-the-cuff. Our set was a realistic, technical marvel, with the scenes from the past zipping in and out on clever winches. We even had a sink on stage, with running water, so that the doctors and nurses and orderlies who were constantly coming into the hospital environment could wash their hands, as they would in a real hospital.
The elaborate apparatus for the medical treatment Ned is undergoing, as well as everything having to do with blood, was also worked out meticulously. I have not, in this published version, completely detailed all this medical minutiae, or the comings and goings of the nonspeaking hospital staff that the availability of a group of young Circle Rep interns allowed us to utilize in peopling our stage. Nor have I gone into too much detail about how the blood machinery looked and worked, beyond cursory descriptions.
I guess what Iām saying, and hoping, is that a lot of inventive ways will be found to deal with any problems designing and producing my play might raiseāthat there is no right way, and that, as in all theater, imagination is also one of the actors, and there are many ways to play the part.
A note about the songs Alexander sings to taunt his father in Act I: it is not essential that these be the particular songs, so long as the songs used are from this era, which is the end of World War II.
There are, for instance, a great many other Andrews Sistersā songs, available now on numerous CDs. I happen to be very fond of āVictory Polka,ā but itās hard to locate the Time-Life Music CDs that contain the only recording I know of it (the second CD or fourth cassette of the album: āV-Disc, The Songs that Went to War, World War I Fiftieth Anniversary Collectorās Editionā).
The South Pacific songs are available on both the original Broadway cast recording or the soundtrack album of the film. The songs from Show Boat (āWhereās the Mate For Meā and āMake Believeā) as well as the brief exchange of dialogue are best represented on the complete EMI Show Boat (CD 7491082) or (my favourite) on the soundtrack from the MGM film, Till the Clouds Roll By (Sony CD AK 47029).
Introduction
I began arranging for the production of The Destiny of Me when I thought I was shortly going to die. Itās a play Iāve been working on for yearsāone of those āfamilyā slash āmemoryā plays I suspect most playwrights feel compelled at some point to try their hand at in a feeble attempt, before itās too late, to find out what their lives have been all about. I figured it would be the last words of this opinionated author.
Not only did I think my play would be done while I was on my deathbed or after, I decided I would definitely leave word that it would not be done while my mother, who is now approaching ninety-three, was still alive. I certainly didnāt want to be around to discover how she would react to the portrayal, by her fifty-seven-year-old homosexual son, of some fifty years of her life.
As destiny would have it, I appear to have received a respite from my expected imminent demise, at least one sufficient enough to ask myself: what have I gone and done?
I call The Destiny of Me a companion play to the one I wrote in 1985, The Normal Heart, about the early years of AIDS. Itās about the same leading character, Ned Weeks, and the events of the earlier play have transpired before the curtain rises on the new one; it is not necessary, as they say, to have seen one to see the other. (The deathbed play remains to he written; now I have the chance to write a trilogy.)
Oh, Iāve had to make a few little changes. Instead of facing death so closely, Ned Weeks now only fears it mightily. And the hospital where heād gone to die is now the hospital where he goes to try to live a little longer.
He still tries to figure out what his lifeās been all about.
This play now seems very naked to me. Iām overwhelmed with questions that didnāt bother me before. Why was it necessary for me to write it? Why do I want people to see it? What earthly use is served by washing so much of āthe Weeks familyā linen in public?
When I wrote The Normal Heart, I had no such qualms. I knew exactly what I wanted to achieve and there was no amount of anything that could repress my hell-or-high-water determination to see that play produced, to hear my words screamed out in a theater, and to hope Iād change the world.
In what possible way could The Destiny of Me ever change the world?
About a dozen years ago I found myself talking to a little boy. I realized the little boy was me. And he was talking back. I was not only talking to myself but this myself was a completely different individual, with his own thoughts, defenses, and character, and a personality often most at odds with his grown-up self These conversations frightened me. Itās taken me years of psychoanalysis to rid myself of just such schizophrenic tendencies.
I found myself talking to this kid more and more. I found myself writing little scenes between the two of us. I was in trouble. I was falling in love with this kid. I, who face a mirrorāand the worldāeach day with difficulty, had found something, inside myself, to love. I found myself writing this kidās journeyāone that could only complete itself in death.
I should point out that I have always hated anything that borders on the nonrealistic. I hate science fiction and horror movies. I do not want to see a play, be it by Herb Gardner or Neil Simon or Luigi Pirandello, in which one actor (the author) talks to himself as embodied in another actor. My life has always been too bound up in harsh realities to believe in such fantastic possibilities, theatrical or otherwise. Nor have I ever been one to write comfortably in styles not realistic, not filled with facts and figures and truth. (Some readers tell me my novel, Faggots, is about as surreal a portrayal of the gay world as could be, but it was all the real McCoy to me.)
As I wrote on, in addition to worrying about my motherās reaction, I began to taunt myself with other fears. There is only one Long Dayās Journey into Night. There is only one Death of a Salesman. And a million feeble attempts to duplicate their truth and to provoke their tears. And each playwright has only one family story to tell. And only one chance to tell it. Most, if theyāre lucky, throw their feeble attempts in the waste basket or file them with the stuff they plan to bequeath to their alma mater or unload on the University of Texas.
I further complicated my task by determining to write a personal history: a journey to acceptance of oneās own homosexuality. My generation has had special, if not unique, problems alo...