Chapter 1: Let Her Be Her
A womanâs worth has been substantial all along. A quick read of the first chapter of Genesis reveals three helpful truths about humankindâwomen, as well as menâand while we may debate the timing, order, and priority of the creation scene, whatâs known for sure is that divinity, unity, and diversity were involved. Men and women were created in Godâs divine image; men and women walked in unity with God, and also with each other; and men and women were men and women. They were different one from another, per Godâs perfect plan.
Divinity
Godâs original posture toward humanity was not at all ambivalent: he created themâmale and female alikeâin his glorious image, and he purposed themâagain, male and female alikeâfor three primary tasks. They were to reign over the animal kingdom; they were to fill the earth and subdue it; and they were to enjoy the creation around them, this paradise laid out by a loving and generous God.
The triple occurrence of âtheyâ here is important. God did not create only man in his image; he created woman that way too. God did not task only man with dignified work; he tasked woman that way too. âTheyâ ruled together, sharing authority and dominion equally. Which is kind of ironic, because before the curse of the fall made people power-hungry and petty and corrupt, nobody had any use for authority, dominion, and clout. âBoth men and women were responsible to fulfill their ministries of service for Godâs glory,â my friend Bill Hybels says, âin the manner God had gifted them and to the degree to which they had been apportioned faith.â4
In other words, women were not created as afterthoughts, add-ons, or additives, like the kind I put in my truckâs gas tank, to give me a little boost. No, they were an integral part of the deal, from the very beginning of time. God welcomed his first divine daughter in a pretty powerful way: he referred to her by the Hebrew term ezer kenegdo, which translates in English to âhelpmeetâ or âhelpmate.â As the NIV version of the famous verse has it: âThe Lord God said, âIt is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for himâ (Genesis 2:18).
But before your mind rushes to Aha! I knew it! This guy wants all women to only serve men! Barefoot and pregnant and submissive and subdued. I knew this is what a man would suggest!âlet me note two key items.
First, letâs keep in mind that if God intended womanâs sole role to be nothing more than an obedient, subservient sidekick to her husband, then any woman existing in a state of singleness would be living outside of Godâs will. Obviously, this is not the case.
And second, of the twenty-one times the phrase ezer kenegdo is used throughout Scripture, sixteen of them are used to refer to God himself. For example:
âHear, Lord, and be merciful to me. Lord, be my help.â (Psalm 30:10)
âWe wait in hope for the Lord; he is our help and our shield.â (Psalm 33:20)
âHouse of Aaron, trust in the Lordâhe is their help and shield.â (Psalm 115:10)
âBlessed are those whose help is the God of Jacob, whose hope is in the Lord their God.â (Psalm 146:5)5
God uses the same name for Eve that he uses for himself, which means that unless God had a massive inferiority complex, he had something more in mind than woman as congenial add-on to man.
Rather than referring to Eve as a second-class citizen, he says, âThink of it this way: I am what Eve was meant to be for Adam. And I am the great I Am!â Listen, Eve was created to show up for her mate. She was meant to do more than submit. I love how one author puts it: âIf Adam must think for, decide for, protect, and provide for the woman, she actually becomes a burden on himânot much help, when you think about it. The kind of help man needs demands full deployment of her strengths, her gifts, and the best she has to offer. His life will change for the better because of what she contributes to his life.â6
âHelpfulness,â in the Genesis sense of the term, is about as far as you can get from the idea of woman as lesser-than, dumber-than doormat/assistant/slave. Women, according to God, are valuable. They matter deeply to him. And therefore deeply matter to us.
~ ~ ~
Iâm from the south, which is often a wonderful thing and sometimes a perplexing one. Perhaps perplexing things happen up north; I know for sure they do down south. For example, in various southern states whose identities Iâll keep to myself, I have seen firsthand this troubling dynamic: A mom and a dad have both a teenage daughter and a teenage son. Sometimes the boy is older; sometimes the girl. Both areârelatively speakingâresponsible, reliable kids. Both get good grades, or both excel at sports. Both tend to run with âgood kids.â Both customarily show respect and kindness and love. But despite all these similarities and good qualities, the daughter is treated differently than the son. The daughter has a twelve-oâclock curfew; the son can stay out as late as he wants. The daughter is told no when she asks for a cell phone, but the son is handed a slick new iPhone, because the boys get the toys, right?
The daughter has to bum rides off friends every weekend; the son is freely given the keys to his parentsâ cars. The daughter is encouraged to find a ânice young manâ to marry; the son is slipped college applications left and right. At social gatherings, the daughter is asked to âjoin the womenâ in the kitchen; the son is invited to play pool or watch sports. The daughter is kept on an ultra-short leash, while the son is left to explore the world.
As I say, maybe this kind of backward behavior is at work in places such as Montana and Michigan and Maine as well, in which case, mea culpa to my southern friends. To all people in all geographies: Stop the madness. Please.
We are saying something about the value of a woman when we diminish her experience of life on this earth, especially while simultaneously elevating the experience of men. And if you think this differentiation of young boys and young girls is harmless and has no bearing on future behavior, think again. In research compiled for her book Lean In, author Sheryl Sandberg found that in a clinical test, âif you ask men and women questions on totally objective criteria, men inaccurately assess their performance slightly high, while women inaccurately assess their performance slightly low.â7
Women do not believe they are valuable. Which stands to reason, given we have told them this is so.
When by our assumptions and our actions we ask women to be seen but not heard, to be pretty but not powerful, to be courteous but not challenging, to be amiable but not ambitious, to be submissive but not smartâŚwhen we expect them to merely cook and clean and change diapers, to show up but not speak up, to wear doilies on their heads during church services and whatever you do, keep your thoughts to yourself, we are saying something weighty about their value, about the worth of their very lives. And what weâre saying, in my view, just ainât that great.
But the inverse is also true. When we prioritize the divinity in people, we esteem themâmen and women alike. We honor themâmen and women alike. We raise up their God-given valueâmen and women alike. We practice mutual surrender, mutual submissionâas men, and as women, alike. We buck the trends of our wayward culture, which demands that a womanâs value equates to her chest size, her sex appeal, her charm. And itâs happening younger and younger these days. If youâve seen the reality show Toddlers and Tiaras, then you know exactly what I mean. When overzealous parents are trotting out three- and four-year-old girls in fishnets and full makeup and asking them to glance coyly over their shoulder so that the judges will boost their scores, weâve got a problem on our hands. Hereâs what weâre telling those future women: âIf you want the worldâs attention, youâll have to be overtly sexual to get it. If you expect to compete in this âmanâs world,â if you ever hope to be valued or heard, then swinging your hips and shimmying your shoulders is really your only choice.â
When we minimize the worth of women, we minimize the worth of her Maker. This is never a wise thing to do. Jesus says, âI came for the sake of freedom.â Weâre to be about freedom tooâfreedom from suppression, freedom from marginalization, freedom from bondage, freedom from anything that lessens the value of womankind.
We enslave women and girls not just when we trick them into lives of destitution and servitude or when we trade them across borders as sex slavesâand for more than 20 million, tragically, this is their current lotâbut also when we leave them feeling trapped in a world that values them only for the size of their breasts. We begin to free them when we plant more helpful seed, and then water it until a useful harvest bursts forth: âYou are the apple of your Fatherâs eye!â we can affirm. âAnd your value is not lost on me. What you see is valid, and what youâre experiencing is meaningful. The thoughts you think? The que...