The Red Baron

Manfred von Richthofen

• Publisher: Pen & Sword Military
• Year: 2009
• ISBN:
  9781473819597
• Topic: Historia
• Subtopic: Historia militar y marítima

The highest-scoring fighter pilot of World War I tells of his life and combat career in an autobiography that "brings the man behind the myth to life" ( The Great War Magazine ). Manfred von Richthofen—the Red Baron—was the most celebrated fighter pilot of the First World War, and was holder of the Blue Max, Pour le Mérite, Germany's highest military decoration. He was credited with 80 victories in the air, before being shot down in disputed circumstances at age 26. In this autobiography, Richthofen tells not only his own story but also that of his contemporaries, their duels in the sky, ever present danger, fame, honor and spiraling death.

CONTENTS

Introduction by Norman Franks
Preface by C.G. Grey
Section I	My Family – Boredom before Verdun
Section II	For the First Time in the Air – The Champagne Battle
Section III	How I met Boelcke – At Last!
Section IV	My First English Victim – I am Shot Down
Section V	A Flying-Man’s Adventure – Schäfer Lands between the Lines
Section VI	The Anti-Richthofen Circus – The German Flying Machines
Appendix 1	Victory List of Baron Manfred von Richthofen, by Norman Frank
Appendix 2	Aircraft flown by Manfred von Richthofen, by N.H. Hauprich
Appendix 3	Notes, by N.H. Hauprich

INTRODUCTION

by Norman Franks

IT HAS been over 70 years since Manfred von Richthofen’s original The Red Air Fighter (Der Rote Kampfflieger) was published in Germany in 1917, the year before he was killed in action over the Somme battlefields in France.

Although the war was still being fought in France, such was the interest in von Richthofen that the book was immediately translated into English and in 1918 published in both England and the United States of America.

Since then much has been written about the famed Red Baron, and of his Flying Circus, Jagdgeschwader Nr. 1. There can be little doubt that von Richthofen was one of the best fighter pilots the Germans had in World War One, not just because he was credited with the most aerial victories of any of the warring nations but because he was the master of his trade – a trade that he, and all other air fighters of that war, had had to learn for themselves. There were no pilot’s notes or approved tactics memoranda to study. The only guidance he and others had in 1916 was from his commander in Jasta 2, the famous Oswald Boelcke, who had himself been self-taught.

Another sign of Richthofen’s greatness is that he, too, was able to show his own junior pilots how it was done; he was a natural leader and held in high esteem by his superiors.

Not all of the many stories, books and articles about him have put von Richthofen in a good light; some, indeed have been quite disparaging. But, if the last 70 years have taught us anything, it is to look at the First World War in a more positive way, as one looks at earlier wars and the men who fought them.

It is often the case that those who write of such men as von Richthofen are on the victorious side – the winners. It is they who more often than not try to dictate how future generations should view a conflict or a person in that conflict. So it was with von Richthofen. The years in which the story of the First Great War in the Air could be told, the 1930s, became the heyday of both the pulp-writers, and of those who tried earnestly to be objective about the recent Great War; in those years the aviation market was flooded with stories of battles fought above the Western Front. Some were good, some fanciful, some even totally untrue or at best, over-romantic. There were plenty of heroes among the winners, whether alive or dead.

When it came to the “enemy”, however, there were those who tried to be objective, others condescending, while a few felt the need to be totally against any idea that any German airman had been good. Naturally, the majority of these latter writers had not fought in the war, certainly not been in the airforce. Thus some of the tales about the German “aces” began to be distorted for the general public, who were now clamouring to hear about that world above the trenches, the mighty gash of earthworks that ran from the Channel coast to the border with Switzerland, where the Knights of the Air fought duels with their chivalrous adversaries.

Manfred von Richthofen, being the greatest of the German fighting pilots – he had to be, he had shot down the most! – was a natural target for the sensation writers. Most of his victories were obsolete two-seaters, they wrote; he always fought with his squadrons protecting his back; he claimed many victories that his men had shot down; he always tried to surprise his victims, shooting them down without giving them a chance – and so it went on. The truth is a little less sensational.

Let us examine some of these statements: obsolete two-seaters. As the RFC and RAF were using aeroplanes in front line service, the term “obsolete” isn’t really correct. The fact that some of these aircraft were inferior in performance, both in speed, firepower and manoeuvrability, doesn’t make them obsolete. And if they were flying an inferior machine, whose fault was that? Certainly it wasn’t Manfred von Richthofen’s.

Being a dedicated soldier for his country, it was his job to attack and shoot down his country’s enemies. There could be no question of his not attacking because he was in a better aeroplane! Those same two-seaters were often helping to guide Allied shell-fire down onto German positions, German troops, his fellow countrymen. Of course he had to help stop that happening. That the BE2Cs or RE8s of the British Corps squadrons were slower was part and parcel of their job; one couldn’t direct gunfire or make a detailed reconnaissance in a fast aeroplane! Most of the time, these Corps aircraft were protected by single-seater patrols, but it didn’t always work out that way. Life is never that easy.

The assertions that von Richthofen flew with his men protecting him, or that he claimed victories that others had scored are correct on the one hand, but totally wrong on the other. The German fighting squadrons, the Jastas, were hunting units, designed specifically to seek out the enemy aeroplanes and stop them doing their work, whether it be directing gunfire, taking photographs of the German positions, observing what the Germans were doing behind their front lines, bombing them, attacking the trenches, or protecting other machines. Like hunters, they flew in packs, ready to bring the maximum of their number into a battle situation, in order to do the maximum damage.

When the Jastas were formed in the summer of 1916, they consisted of 12 pilots and aeroplanes, with a Jasta commander. These 12 were generally divided into two subsections and the commander would usually alternate as leader of each sub-section, sometimes of five aeroplanes, but usually of six. Thus one man of each section could have a day off, or a man might have reported sick, etc. In 1916, these six men would fly patrols to the front lines, but stay well back from them, and seek out any French or British aeroplanes, working above the trenches. Often they would not even take to the air until front-line troops reported British or French machines actually in the act of crossing the front lines. Depending on where these intruders were, they could even be seen from the Jasta airfields, and powerful field glasses were generally on hand to view them prior to take-off!

The good and able commanders would not generally rush into the battle with guns blazing, but rather size up the situation, fly until they were in the most favourable position to make a successful attack, and then dive upon their opponents. If the opposition comprised just one lone machine, then the commander would generally be the first to have the opportunity to bring that aeroplane down, safe in the knowledge that his men were keeping a watch for other hostile aeroplanes, while he concentrated on the job in hand. If there were two enemy aircraft, the next senior pilot might take on the second machine, and only if there was a larger formation of, say, bombing aircraft engaged, would the six Jasta pilots split up and fight individually, after the initial attacking swoop.

Far from being something to deride, these tactics were simply the most efficient way of maximising one’s forces in order to inflict the maximum hurt upon one’s foe. It was a good theory put into even better practice. The German Jasta pilots became adept at this method of air warfare – the list of RFC casualties in 1917 alone stands testimony to that.

Throughout the First War, the Allied airmen were indoctrinated into taking the war to the enemy. Theirs was always an offensive war. Daily the Royal Flying Corps, and later the RAF headquarters, sent out men and machines to make reconnaissance flights, both short and long, photographic sorties, bombing raids, and so on. They chose two methods of protection. One was some form of close escort by fighting aeroplanes, the other was offensive patrols in the general area of the other machines, in order to engage would-be attackers. These offensive patrols, OPs, would also provide opportunity to attack any German two-seaters they spotted doing similar work to their own Corps aircraft, who might similarly be protected by single-seaters. In this way, some of the air battles, known later as dog-fights, began.

Both sides had strict rules covering the claim of pilots to have downed an opponent in air combat. As the vast majority of the battles were fought over the German side of the lines, it followed that claims by German pilots were easier to verify. The wreckage could be viewed, bodies found or prisoners taken. From the very early days of air fighting, there was a certain kudos in bringing down an opponent. In early 1915 it was fast becoming a common occurrence but nevertheless an important “victory” for the pilot. By the middle of that year, when the first single-seater Fokker monoplanes began to be attached to German two-seater units for protection purposes, the rise to fame of a few of the early pioneers of air fighting began. Immelmann, Boelcke, Wintgens, von Multzer, Parschau – all became famous in these early days. Boelcke eventually became known as the father of German fighting tactics, and it was he, in 1916, who saw the potential in a two-seater pilot on the Russian front – Manfred von Richthofen.

The rule that applied to victories on the German side was that the enemy aeroplane had to be located, either intact or wreckage, at the place the pilot said he brought it down, and verified either by other men in the air or by ground observers. Any that fell or landed on the Allied side of the trenches were often not confirmed, unless someone else actually saw it crash beyond reasonable repair, burn, or it was shelled subsequently by gunfire and seen to be destroyed. This system did not leave much room for a pilot to try to increase his own score either by deception or by taking another’s claim. Anyone who tried and was caught out, soon left the front line squadron!

On the British side, confirming victories was more difficult, but as long as the aeroplane attacked was seen to crash, burn or in some other way be destroyed, and verified again by either air or ground observers, it was credited to the victorious pilot. However, with the difficulty of flying above cloud or very high up, perhaps hotly engaged by other aircraft, it was not always possible to observe the fate of an aircraft that appeared to be going down for the last time – generally in a spinning nose dive or even an all-out plunge earthwards. This gave rise ...