1
John Stottâs journey
Living to reflect love for our Creator
When John Stott died in 2011 at the age of ninety, a service of thanksgiving for his life filled St Paulâs Cathedral, with archbishops and the Bishop of London present. It was said of Stott that, alongside William Temple, he was âthe most influential clergyman in the Church of Englandâ in the twentieth century (The Times 2011). His reputation was even greater outside the UK. Billy Graham wrote:
Few people have influenced my life and ministry more than my good friend John Stott. His dedication to Jesus Christ, his commitment to the authority of the Bible, and his passion for world evangelization were a great encouragement to me. His commitment to social justice and his profound compassion for the poor and oppressed of the world challenged us to think more deeply about these important dimensions of our faith.
(Graham 2012)
In the 2005 TIME magazine citation that included Stott on its annual list of the 100 most influential people in the world, Billy Graham noted that John Stott ârepresents a touchstone of authentic biblical scholarship that . . . has scarcely been paralleled since the days of the 16th-century European Reformers.â His work was âa significant factor in the explosive growth of Christianityâ worldwide, given his intentional personal investment in training and resourcing church leaders in Asia, Africa and Latin America from the early 1960s and throughout his lifeâs ministry (Graham 2005). Despite his heritage of class privilege and a significant public profile, Stott embraced a simple lifestyle as part of his life of faith (Stott 2010b; Labberton 2021). Notably, Billy Grahamâs short 2005 commendation mentioned that Stottâs own royalties funded much international ministry, and that the âmodesty of his lifestyle is evidenced in the simplicity of his living quarters, limited to a two-room flat in London . . . and a renovated farm on the Welsh coast, where he has written his booksâ longhand, in rustic conditions. A New York Times commentator suggested that if evangelicals had a pope, it would have been Stott (Brooks 2004).
In his A History of the Church of England 1945â1980, Paul Welsby wrote:
In the pre-war and immediately post-war years many evangelicals had been more concerned with preserving their own purity of doctrine than with attempting to co-operate with others in evangelism and the ecumenical movement and were too parochially orientated to take any influential part in the higher councils of the Church . . . During the nineteen-fifties, however, a gradual change took place and this was largely due to the status and influence of one man. John Stott was a person of wide vision and deep understanding, and very persuasive. A gifted expositor of the Bible, a prolific writer and an evangelist, he was also a statesman who possessed the ability to understand other points of view.
(Welsby 1984, pp. 212â213)
Stott made major contributions to biblical understanding, particularly the theology of the atonement, together with the nature of mission and social ethics. He was also a highly effective evangelist. In 1952, only two years after becoming Rector of All Souls Church Langham Place, in the heart of Londonâs West End, he led a mission to his alma mater, Cambridge; it was the first of what would become more than forty university missions and it ushered in a new style of thoughtful evangelism. It was reported that âhe was biblical, scholarly though not academic, firm but not caustic, more evidently a man with love for people than some of the older preachersâ (Barclay and Horn 2002, p. 238). Crowds attended and many professed faith. His addresses formed the basis of his book Basic Christianity, published in 1958, which by 2010 had sold more than 2.5 million copies and had been translated into more than fifty languages (Stanley 2013, p. 122). He wrote around fifty books. Two compilations of his writings have been published (Dudley-Smith 1995b; Keswick Classics 2008); he has been the subject of five biographies (Catherwood 1984; Dudley-Smith 1999, 2001; Steer 2009; Cameron 2012; Chapman 2012); a bibliography (Dudley-Smith 1995a); and two books of reminiscences (Cameron 2020; Wright 2011) . Many of his books have been reprinted often; two of them (Men with a Message and Christian Mission in the Modern World) have been republished with extensive commentaries.
Stottâs reputation was built on the basis of disciplined Bible study and careful expository preaching. It could well be said of him, as Charles Spurgeon wrote of John Bunyan, âPrick him anywhere â his blood is Bibline, the very essence of the Bible flows from him.â His ministry has been described as both apostolic and Abrahamic (Wright 2020, p. 31). Apostolic because âit faithfully reflected the passion and priorities of the biblical apostles: evangelism and teachingâ; and Abrahamic because of his commitment to reaching out to the nations through the number of international evangelical bodies with which he had close association â the Lausanne Movement, World Evangelical Alliance, International Fellowship of Evangelical Students, Scripture Union, A Rocha, Tearfund â together with his passion for the truth of a gospel that he believed had not been grasped until its radical demands, as well as its gracious promises, had been grasped and lived out by âintegrated Christiansâ.
Christopher Catherwood, his first biographer, writing in 1984, described him as âabove all a preacherâ, albeit with âthe aim to relate Godâs unchanging Word to our ever-changing world . . . earthing of the Word in the World is not something optionalâ (Catherwood 1984, p. 31). Stott himself wrote that âthe Christian preacher is neither a speculator who invents new doctrines which please him, nor an editor who excises old doctrines which displease him, but a steward, Godâs steward, dispensing faithfully to Godâs household the truths committed to him in the Scriptures, nothing more, nothing less, and nothing elseâ (Catherwood 1984, p. 37). Catherwood is careful to emphasize Stottâs concern for social issues and his insistence on âbalanced Christianityâ but, to him, Stott was first and foremost a preacher and expositor. Near the end of his life, Stott declared that he would like to be remembered as âan ordinary Christian who has struggled to understand, expound, relate and apply the word of Godâ (Cameron 2020, p. 5).
Notwithstanding, and despite his formidable intellect and personal asceticism, Stott was a âpeople personâ. He had an enviable ability to remember people he had met and had a quick rapport with all ages, without in any way lessening or compromising any of his beliefs or his submission to Jesus as his master and Saviour. This did not reduce at all his acknowledging and teaching the authority of Godâs revelation in Scripture.
Accepting the danger of oversimplifying, it is possible to identify five interconnected, consistent and progressive themes that characterized Stottâs life and became ever clearer to him as his ministry developed and matured.
- He was immersed in and subordinated to Godâs word as set out in the Scriptures.
- He insisted that Godâs workings can â and should â be seen in both creation and redemption.
- He abominated the dualistic separation of body and spirit; his emphasis was on the necessity of âdouble listeningâ â to both ancient word and modern world.
- He believed that it was illegitimate to separate the âGreat Commandmentâ (âTo love oneâs neighbour as oneselfâ) from the âGreat Commissionâ (âGo and make disciplesâ): the two should be seen as complementary.
- He was prepared to change his mind if he believed his interpretation of Scripture was wrong. He changed his attitude to pacifism, creationism, abortion and, most importantly in the present context, to Godâs mandate for creation care.
These elements of Stottâs life can be seen clearly in his last book The Radical Disciple, published the year before he died, and which reasonably can be taken to be his considered testament to the Church. In it, Stott presented a challenge:
That we who claim to be disciples of the Lord Jesus will not provoke him to say again, âWhy do you call me Lord, Lord, and do not do what I say?â (Luke 6:46) . . . Our common way of avoiding radical discipleship is to be selective; choosing those areas in which commitment suits us, and staying away from those areas in which it will be costly. But because Jesus is Lord, we have no right to pick and choose the areas in which we will submit to his authority.
(Stott 2010b, pp. 14â16)
The Radical Disciple lists eight characteristics of Christian discipleship that Stott considered essential but neglected. Seven of them were shown by Stott in his own life: non-conformity, Christlikeness, maturity, simplicity, balanced judgment, involvement in community and death, in the sense of death and life in Christ. Death for Stott, as he approached his own physical death, was not merely the termination of life but also...