Aliceās Adventures in Wonderland
Lewis Carrollās well-known childrenās fantasy begins during a time of leisurely boredom for Alice that is soon interrupted by the first of a series of very strange encounters. While sitting with her sister on a riverbank, wondering if it is worth her while getting up to collect daisies for a daisy chain, Alice sees a rather anxious White Rabbit hurrying off to goodness knows where. Without a momentās hesitation, Alice follows him into a rabbit-hole. What happens next concurs with the experience of many people during an accident or other emergency when the passage of time seems to slow down. Almost immediately, Alice is falling vertically down a deep well and yet this takes place in such slow motion that she can observe with curiosity the sights she sees as she descends while also reflecting on several other matters as well. She tries to apply the geography she has learnt at school to determine if she might fall right through the earth. It is significant for this case study that, although Alice wonders what her present latitude or longitude is, she āhad not the slightest idea what Latitude was, or Longitude eitherā (5).
Even in the early stage of her adventures ā crises marked by curiosity or wonder more than anxiety ā Aliceās lack of accurate bearings means she applies the principle of heading for the open-ended spaces of the unknown. In this, she employs Langerās principle of āhorizons of possibilityā rather than simply building on what she knows. Her quest, so to speak, is for what she has little inkling of. Also of interest for us, Alice soon discovers that throughout her adventures she will need to adapt her scale or stature to fit into the situations she wishes to explore, the means to do so always fortuitously appearing when needed. This is a reminder that one cannot expect to endure the passage through a crisis without undergoing significant changes in oneself. This feature of crisis becomes evident soon after Alice begins to explore the strange world around her when she reaches a double impasse. First, she enters a hall full of locked doors and a tiny key that fits none of them and then she notices a tiny door that will open but that she cannot fit through. She knows she needs to be smaller but has no idea how to become so (8ā9). A feature of the bizarre situations that confront her is that they awaken in her a belief in unheard-of capabilities ā such as shrinking and growing so as to be able to fully enter into the world she discovers down the rabbit-hole.
Aliceās Adventures in Wonderland provokes questions to do with scale and knowledge or, more precisely, how to chart a course for the unknown. A crisis can make us feel bewilderingly small or, for that matter, disconcertingly large, even though our actual size remains the same ā and it can render everything we think we know rather insignificant in the light of the changes it brings. I was once in conversation with a colleague about the #MeToo movement and we concluded that the recognition gained by it has made us, as female, middle-aged scholars feel vindicated, a little taller and stronger, more capable of entering into a new stage of debate on and activism for womenās rights. Conversely, so many aspects of the climate change crisis make many people feel small and powerless. However, Aliceās adventures teach us that strange new events do not happen independently of us as observers ā they bring with them reasons and pressure for us to adapt, either for or against.
Recent years have been about both growing and shrinking, and not only in ourselves but also in the scale of our endeavours. In times of crisis, there is probably no point in aiming for that familiar āaha-momentā when the teacher dazzles the students by revealing a particular interpretation of a passage or a stanza as if the text encodes a deep secret and the teacher is an oracle. When exploring the unknown, such moments do not ring true since the idea of a singular reading, no matter how brilliant, narrows the field of possibilities too much. While being a valid method in itself, it is unnecessarily goal-oriented, like decoding a treasure map to find where X marks the spot where the booty is buried. A crisis does not contain a solution that someone has hidden beforehand. Rather, there may be many solutions, and many that can work together with others. Finding them requires imagination to work with what is at hand often while putting it to unfamiliar uses. To take an example, in conversation with the Cheshire Cat, when Alice declares, āI donāt want to go among mad people,ā it is tempting to read the exchange that follows as a simple indictment of the human species as a whole:
āOh, you canāt help that,ā said the Cat: āweāre all mad here. Iām mad. Youāre mad.ā
āHow do you know Iām mad?ā said Alice.
āYou must be,ā said the Cat, āor you wouldnāt have come here.ā
(90)
An eco-critical response to this passage would likely conclude that we must be mad since it āraises the question of whether a rational species would choose to get to the point where it is addicted to growth, consumption and other patterns of thinking and action that ultimately threaten its very own existenceā (Milne et al. 802ā803). I wonder, how helpful is such an observation in a crisis situation? However insightful this reading may be, it keeps to the already known binary of saneāmad to advance a proposition that is hardly controversial and not nearly playful enough.
By reading the Cheshire Catās remark straightforwardly as above, the unsurprising take-home message is that you, the student or reader, are mad because you are part of the problem. However, to develop resilience and resourcefulness in students during times of upheaval, we often need to eschew the overly familiar and invite further complexity on a much broader scale. In contrast to making a familiar critique of the human, one could look for something that is more of a provocation, a response to the Cheshire Cat that is more likely to offer the student the encouragement to find a range of alternative paths in place of a simple right-or-wrong fork in the road. Apart from that, the untroubled and playful tone of Lewis Carrollās story reminds me that to be able to conduct teaching at all in times of crisis might seem to beg the question, What crisis? I mean, if there are classes being run, and texts (admittedly, some rather sombre ones too, not just Aliceās Adventures) and above all time to engage in the study of literature, then surely at least those of us involved in such pursuits are not actually facing a crisis. Well, to get a strongly worded answer to that question I could just ask some of my students.
As I have mentioned, a feature of our times is that students often themselves raise serious doubts as to the relevance of literary studies, or any schooling at all ā the school strikes for the climate have taught us this. But to address the fact that the relative calm of a seminar room seems to belie a state of crisis, we need only recollect the lessons taught by Timothy Morton and Rob Nixon. They both refer to global calamities that exist presently and affect every person on earth now and for generations to come but, either because of their vast spatial distribution (āhyperobjectā) or the glacial slowness of their onset (āslow violenceā), they are almost impossible for most of us to see. And there are crises that should be there for all to see, such as racism and injustice, but that nevertheless are overlooked in public discourse until movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter bring them more starkly into view.
There is a strong case to be made for the value of literary studies to be taught during crises and it has to do with how storytelling cannot be silenced by crisis and nor can stories be erased. On the contrary, in times of turmoil there are more stories not fewer, and the one thing they all have in common is that they insist on being heard and for this they demand that we take the time to attend to them. To put it in Alice-in-Wonderland terms: instead of falling headlong down the bottomless well of a crisis, to take heed of stories and seek out their counsel is actively to slow down our response to crisis rather than feed its flames.
The playfulness of Aliceās Adventures in Wonderland allows me to be comfortable with a degree of confusion as to what it might all mean, and this frees me to embark on a joint adventure with my students. The novel ludicrously juxtaposes the imperious Queen of Hearts and her terrified courtiers with Alice and other subversives (such as the Cheshire Cat) and is thus a light-hearted text dealing with how to sidestep real anxiety. Like Alice, I am mostly ignorant of the forces that cause a crisis to break out, yet I too follow a trail that seems relevant to me, even though I do not know from the outset fully how it is relevant. I glimpse what I donāt quite know rushing past me like a White Rabbit anxiously announcing how late it is. For whom is time short? For what might it be running out? Readings vary depending on what one makes of the Rabbit. Before rushing to any conclusion, I want to investigate the matter with my students. I apply some pacing to the Lewis Carroll seminar by setting up a primer for students ahead of a shared discussion, portioning out the seminar time to include this pre-seminar activity. For the primer I post this question for them to mull over:
āImagine noticing #OhdearOhdearIshallbelate starting to trend on some of your feeds. Before you investigate online, you think about what it might refer to. What do you come up with?ā
They are invited to record their answers in words/image/sound on a Padlet page simply accessed via phone or computer and immediately shared with the rest of the class. During the days before the seminar, Iām delighted when someone posts, āI never feel there is enough time any more ā how can we slow down?ā I respond by pointing out that the opening pages of Aliceās Adventures deal with speed and slowness and suggest that the group do a close reading looking for what can be learned from Aliceās slow-motion fall.
Questions emerge from student discussions. I offer questions as well. What is important is that a resourceful way to think about crisis is that it can be imbued with a spirit of quest. And letās not forget that quest is at the root of the word question and questions are usually more important than answers when tackling the unknown. Is there some part of nature that feels time is short? Does Alice feel it? What does the speed of life have to do with power structures? These reflections become a way of linking learning about literature to our experience of the world and to get an increased understanding of how the two are entwined, or even networked. I take the students through the point I made just now about how stories insist that we slow down enough to focus on them. What do we fill the time with when this happens? I get some responses: critical thinking, pleasure of being entertained. Not everyone in the class is highly vocal so Iām pleased when some time after the face-to-face session ends I see the Padlet still receiving further responses to this.
In order to explore the quest motif in literature, I introduce students to the compare the quest activity in which I present them with a list of standard features of quest narrative so that they can assess any possibly quest-like characteristics of the text we are studying. You can compile your own list; I have adapted mine from one supplied by Jenny Grahame and Kate Oliver in their teaching compendium for Suzanne Collinsā The Hunger Games. In their exercise, they instruct students to note down how the quest motif is treated in that novel. The following are among the features of the quest narrative that are particularly pertinent to crisis, especially because they underscore both the challenges and rewards of change:
- A problem forces the hero (usually male) to set off on a journey with a specific goal
- The goal is a reward or a prize, often a magical object. This can be something new, or it can be something that was stolen from the hero
- The hero enters an extraordinary world, a land of adventures, tests and magical awards
- The hero brings back the prize or reward
(Grahame and Oliver 15)
Students may post reflections in a shared Google Doc or any other collaborative tool. Unsurprisingly, someone notes that Alice is female, though this does not much resemble a feminist tale and she does not have a specific goal. I point out that the absence of a goal might align the story more with an open-ended quest. We discuss this possibility ā that one might be in quest for something one knows not what. Apart from that, there is general agreement that Alice seems to be on a quest because she enters a land of adventures. However, the story doesnāt seem to contain a clearly defined prize or reward that Alice brings back with her. Add to this the fact that the āproblemā at the start of Aliceās adventures is merely boredom, which is not a very heroic spur to action. It occurs to me then that an often-discussed stage of crisis is when the public lose interest in it because they have been overwhelmed with stories about the problem. Boredom within a seemingly interminable crisis is itself a separate problem and ā without needing to imagine what Aliceās initial crisis might have been ā it is possible to review her adventures as perfectly suited to dealing with this second-order crisis.
While their findings may indicate that the quest motif as a literary theme is less pertinent for reading Aliceās Adventures in Wonderland, the quest as a methodology is even more useful. One example of learning from the quest motif is found in the chapter āAdvice from a Caterpillarā (59) and it is most suitable for close reading. Once again, size is at the heart of the conundrum here as the hookah-smoking caterpillar informs Alice that one side of the mushroom he is sitting on āwill make you grow taller, and the other side will make you grow shorterā (68). The only problem is that a mushroom being circular has no sides and, even if it did, Alice is not told which produces what effect. This lack of coordinates for reading the world recalls Aliceās earlier ignorance of latitude and longitude. This precipitates Aliceās courageous and arbitrary first step into the unknown followed by her undertaking a scientific investigation by which she samples both sides of the mushroom until she is satisfied that she shrinks when eating from her right hand and grows from her left hand. Her quest, in other words, was for a useful method of adapting to her surrounds and soon we hear Alice declare she has āgot back to my right sizeā (74).
A few sentences more and the chapter concludes with Alice discovering a āfour feet highā house that she believes will take her to āthat beautiful gardenā and thus she ābegan nibbling at the right-hand bit again, and did not venture to go near the house till she had brought herself down to nine inches highā (75). Students can be challenged further at this point. How does she know that she has reached the right size? Is there such a state as being the ācorrectā size (or one correct approach) especially during times of crisis? Instead, circumstances demand that one adapts to each encounter. The quest methodology provokes an ongoing inquiry that does not have a halting point. And it emerges that one of the awards that comes from the quest is the fact of Aliceās having proven that she is up to the problems encountered through her demonstrated resilience and ability to adapt. In a crisis, knowledge sometimes matters less than knowing how to comport oneself. If an unknown remains an unknown we have nevertheless developed ways of dealing with it. Thus readers of the quest methodology in Alice will develop a tolerance of error and understand the value of forgiveness. This also has a lot to do with embracing the principle of change, as seen in the next novel. Change is sometimes felt to be a problem whereas upsetting of the status quo is inevitable and not necessarily negative.