Recall the last time you attended worship as a congregation member. Try to remember the moments right before the sermon, when you were listening to the reading of the gospel, or singing a hymn, or praying, perhaps. As you participated in this liturgical moment and anticipated the sermon, can you identify what you were thinking? What were you feeling? Were you hoping for anything in particular? What were your expectations? A response such as āthat dependsā to any of these questions makes perfect sense. Indeed, the way we enter into worship depends upon how our week has been, how our children are acting next to us in the pew, how the Scripture readings strike us, and even whether we trust the person who is about to preach. So, yes, it depends. But in general, consider your typical thoughts, feelings, hopes, and/or expectations as the sermon begins. Now anticipating the next time you will hear a sermon, how might you respond to the questions? As the sermon is about to begin . . .
- ā“ What will you likely be thinking?
- ā“ How will you likely be feeling?
- ā“ What might you be hoping for?
- ā“ What will you be expecting?
Your responses to these questions begin to clarify your understanding of what preaching is and why you think the church includes this practice in worship. If you noted that you hope to gain an understanding of the Scripture readings that were just read, then you might think preaching aims to teach something about the Bible. If you wrote that you expect to be guided in your life of discipleship in the coming week, then you might think preaching has something to do with morality and ethicsāthat is, how Christians are to live in this world. If you identified feelings of dread or thoughts that the next ten to twenty minutes will have nothing to do with you and your life, then, of course, you might consider preaching to be irrelevant, boring, annoying, or something to put up with or the part of worship you would like to see eliminated. If you hope that the sermon will comfort you in your grief, then perhaps your faith assures you that the Holy Spirit accompanies you no matter your situation in life. If you hope to be motivated to get involved in addressing the social injustice rampant in your community, then you might acknowledge the power of prophetic proclamation to transform lives, including yours.
Many of us have taken for granted preaching and its place in worship and have never thought to consider these questions. āWeāve just always done it that way,ā some might say. This chapter encourages you to reflect on your settingās preaching ministry and your role in it. In doing so, you will be engaging in homileticsāthat is, the theological work of reflecting on the art of preaching. By the end of the chapter, you will be able to identify your own understanding of what preaching is and even to assert what you would like preaching to be.
Keeping in mind your responses to the questions above, write your definition of preaching.
Preaching is _________________________________________________________________________________
Letās call what youāve written your āworkingā definition of preaching, since you have the freedom to tweak/amend/upend/rewrite this definition as you read through this book and beyond.
You are in good company in the struggle to write a succinct and clear definition, for many others have attempted to define this multifaceted and adaptable practice we call preaching. Consider this late twelfth-century definition found in the homiletics manual De Arte Praedicatoria (The Art of Preaching, 1199) written by theologian and homiletician Alan of Lille. Preaching is āthe manifest and public instruction in faith and morals, zealously serving the information of [humankind], proceeding by the narrow path of reason and the fountain of authority [Holy Scripture and the writings of the Fathers].ā1 Scholars have acknowledged this as the first formal definition of preaching. What, if anything, in this definition resonates with your experience? How is this definition different from your definition of preaching?
According to Alan of Lilleās definition, preaching has a didactic component; it instructs, it teaches. More specifically, it teaches something that has to do with faith and morality (what one believes and how one lives). Preaching is in service of humankind. This definition also recognizes that a twofold authority is at work: the Holy Scriptures and the writings of the early church fathers. Out of this definition, we get answers to questions such as the following:
- ā“ What is the function of preaching?
- ā“ What is the content of preaching?
- ā“ To whom is preaching directed?
- ā“ Who or what does the practice of preaching serve?
- ā“ What authorities are at work in preaching?
Consider how your working definition assists you in responding to any or all of these questions. Donāt worry if it doesnāt yet, but do notice where it does. Of course, feel free to add to or amend your definition if any of these questions spark something for you.
Preaching is ________________________________________________________________________________
Humanās Role in Preaching
Now consider these questions:
- ā“ Where in your working definition do you fit into the picture? What is your role?
- ā“ Where do others fit into that picture? What is their role?
- ā“ How do you and these āothersā connect with one another, if at all?
Your responses to these questions help identify the anthropology at work in your understanding of preaching.
The assumed anthropology in some preaching definitions emphasizes the role(s) of the preacher. For example, preaching professor and writer Ronald J. Allen asserts that āthe calling of the preacher is to help the congregation move toward a Christian interpretation of the world. The preacher wants to help the congregation learn to think, feel, and act from the perspective of the gospel.ā2 Another scholar and writer, Pablo JimĆ©nez, emphasizes the role of the ordained, since his definition integrates many disciplines in a seminary curriculum: āPreaching, then, is an interdisciplinary work where study and interpretation of the Bible meet with systematic theology, the history of the church, Christian education, pastoral care, and speech. Therefore, preaching is an exercise of theological and pastoral integration.ā3
Other definitions highlight the role(s) of the listeners. Recall Barbara Brown Taylorās definition in the introduction above in which she clearly indicates that congregation members play a key role along with the preacher: āPreaching is not something an ordained minister does for fifteen minutes on Sundays but what the whole congregation does all week long.ā4 Herman Stuempfle, too, recognizes the effective power at work in the important role of ālay amplifiers scattered in every corner of society.ā Because āthe preacherās voice by itself has limited carrying power,ā it is the listeners of the sermon who, in turn, āincarnate [Godās] grace and truth in the whole range of their common life.ā Stuempfle even claims, āthe first business of the individual preacher is to enable the Church to preach.ā5
If your definition has not yet identified the role of the preacher or the hearer, you may want to add something to your definition. These additions could be descriptions of the roles in your current situation or what you have imagined the roles should be. Next, youāll want to consider where God fits into the picture.
Godās Role in Preaching
Does God (as Trinity or as one of the three personsācreator or Jesus or the Holy Spirit) have a role in the practice of preaching? If so, how do you explicitly identify that role? Your responses to these questions will help you identify the theology at work in your understanding of preaching. Take, for example, this statement by Mary Donovan Turner: āThe purpose of preaching is, as it was for the prophets and as it was for Jesus, to disrupt life so that a space can be created, a space in which the Holy Spirit can work, a space in which the community can rethink, revisit priorities, or receive.ā6 Turner acknowledges that the Holy Spiritās active role in preaching is the same as it was in previous eras, when the prophets and Jesus himself preached. First, the Holy Spirit works in lifeās disrupted spaces. Second, the Holy Spirit and humans are working together in the same space. Indeed, to say that God works through humans is a profound theological statement. Turnerās theology of proclamation is clear.
Stuempfle makes a theological claim when he says that āthe Wordā speaks through the preacherās words and then through the words of the listeners as they move out into the world. āThe Wordā itself has agency through human communication. Such efficacy is at work in Stuempfleās Lutheran understanding of preaching, that it is nothing less than a means by which God chooses to impart Godās grace (i.e., āa means of graceā). That too is a profound theological claim.
Already we have some indication that Christian proclamation is collaborative in various waysāfirst, between God and Godās beloved creation, and, second, among Godās beloved children in their various roles.
Shifts in Theories and Practices of Preaching
While there is no one definitive definition of preaching, over time certain emphases have appeared. In fact, the definitions, purposes, and practices of preaching have taken some dramatic turns over the centuries, as outlined by Lucy Atkinson Rose in her book Sharing the Word: Preaching in the Roundtable Church. Rose offers a thirty-thousand-foot flyover summary of three main homiletical strands (traditional, kerygmatic, and transformation) and their distinctive characteristics (both theoretically and practically), distinctions that are at times stark and other times subtle. Each strand has aimed to be faithful for its time and still has proponents today.
Traditional Preaching
According to Rose, traditional preaching, with its aim to win consent from the congregation to a truth claim, enjoys the longest-standing commitment. When persuasion is the goal, an emphasis on the use of rhetoric is foundational. On Christian Doctrine (Book IV in particular), often considered the first homiletical textbook, is instructive. In it, fourth-century bishop of Hippo, Augustine (354ā430 CE), outlines how one might employ classical rhetoric for the purposes of Christian preaching. The dominance of this homiletical voice for numerous centuries is evident in the most common homiletics textbook used well into the twentieth century, John Broadusās On the Preparation and Delivery of Sermons. For Broadus, the preacherās main goal is āto tell people what to believe and why they should believe it,ā7 an...