Dream the future
Know your history
Organize your people
Fight to win
2006 FBI memo that says I use direct action to go to events to cause trouble.
Treasure City Thrift, an anarchist worker co-op I cofounded in Austin, TX, 2006. PHOTO CREDIT: ANN HARKNESS
With Rebecca Solnit, talking about the aftermath of disasters. PHOTO CREDIT: LIZ HIGHLEYMAN
In Austin with Ann Harkness and Robert King, 2009.
Left to right: Jeff Luers, Ryan Shapiro, Will Potter, scott crow.
Original Common Ground Collective cofounders: (left to right) Malik Rahim, Sharon Johnson, scott crow. PHOTO CREDIT: TODD SANCHIONI
Common Ground cofounder Sharon Johnson and volunteer Hali Stone. PHOTO CREDIT: DAVID AMPERSAND
First distribution center in Algiers neighborhood, 2005. PHOTO CREDIT: JACKIE SUMELL
Unidentified, bullet-riddled dead black male. When I first arrived in Algiers in September 2005, we put the metal on him to cover him up. Who killed himâthe police or the white militia? PHOTO CREDIT: JAKE APPLEBAUM
PHOTO CREDIT: CGSTORIES.ORG
Common Ground general assembly, 2006. PHOTO CREDIT: CGSTORIES.ORG
âHouse of Excellence,â one of the many community Internet/phone access sites set up by Common Ground. PHOTO CREDIT: CGSTORIES.ORG
Signs that were all too common across New Orleans in white areas. PHOTO CREDIT: JACKIE SUMELL
A sign with relevance before and after the disaster. PHOTO CREDIT: JACKIE SUMELL
Soldiers in front of Common Groundâs little blue house in the Ninth Ward, 2006. PHOTO CREDIT: CGSTORIES.ORG
MLK school where volunteers using civil disobedience cut the locks and cleaned out the school, 2006. PHOTO CREDIT: CGSTORIES.ORG
Speaking to a crowd in New Orleans: (left to right) Kerul Dyer, Lisa Fithian, Malik Rahim, and Sakura Kone, 2006. PHOTO CREDIT: CGSTORIES.ORG
Meg Perry, young tireless organizer from Maine who was tragically killed while working for Common Ground. PHOTO CREDIT: CGSTORIES.ORG
Shifting Culture without Government
DJ Pangburn
I recently spoke to noted anarchist community organizer scott crow about how average peopleâpeople with dreams, vision, grit, and motivation-can affect change in a very real and quantifiable way after the vote. This isnât a playbook for smashing some McDonaldâs or Starbucks windows but for taking the fight to communities.
A tired cycle exists in American electoral culture. Every two years we vote for federal representatives and senators, and every four years we vote in the presidential election. Each election cycle builds to a critical mass of ideological recriminations that crescendo on election day. Americans then rather sadly wash their hands of the mess and resolve to do little or nothing to actively make democracy work. There is a relinquishing of the responsibility of democracy to representatives. And as weâve seen in the last twelve years of bitter partisan divide, it has produced paralysis instead of results. It has popularized politicians who behave more like actors or programmed holograms than actual problem solvers.
Mr. crow has had a roughly two-decade-long rĂ©sumĂ© of working in community organizing circles, most notably as one of the founders of the Common Ground Collective, one of the largest and most-organized volunteer forces in the post-Katrina wasteland. When Wâs buddy âBrownieâ (Michael Brown) was botching the FEMA response, and the National Guard was enforcing martial law on New Orleans streets, CGC was busy cleaning out destroyed homes, mobilizing free healthcare, clothing, and food, and otherwise delivering mutual aid to a grateful New Orleans population. Much of crowâs current work involves helping communities build worker cooperatives and local economies horizontally, which is explained in more detail below.
We Are More than Just Voters and Consumers
The voter, says crow, must pass into oblivion. In his or her place must arise the doer, the creatorâthat person who sees all potential and jumps into action.
Ancient Rome suffered a political paralysis similar to contemporary America. In Rome, voters were mostly irrelevant. Into this political void came the Roman emperors who, while bringing some domestic stability, only hastened Romeâs fall. Whereas the great American political paralysis might be a melancholic moment for this countryâs patriots, scott crow sees vast opportunities to do great things. âThere are a set of paths in the middle that we havenât even explored to a great extent in this country,â he says. âThe dominant paradigm tells us that we are just voters and consumers with a void of other alternatives. Lifeâpolitics, culture, and economiesâ[involves] more complicated social relationships in this country.â The trick is to be a creator, someone who sees new paths and pursues them energetically. âThe [new paths] arenât always going to be easy,â he says. âBut we will be doing them together; block by block and community by community, as needed.â
Asked if voting has any real redeeming value, crow is mostly pessimistic. âVoting is a lot like recycling: if youâre so damned lazy that you canât do anything else, then at least do that,â he says. âItâs the least you can do. Pulling the lever or throwing something in the correct bin; neither require great effort or thinking, but neither have real impact either.â
Community organizers like crow have no time for political saviors. They are individuals who eschew antiquated democratic politics. Dreamers and doers who depart the political reservation for more unknown trajectories.
âWeâve had this mythology of the Great White Hope, that some great leader who will take us from our chains into the future,â notes crow, a little astonished that so many still buy into the collective democratic hallucination. âWhen âheâ failsâas they always doâwe blame the person and not the systems that got us there. We need to look anew at our world and think of the different ways we can engage with the world, our city, our neighborhoods, and ourselves.â
âWe have other choices,â he adds. âWhy is that we demand choices in MP3 players, sodas, or schools, for example, but not in our economic, cultural, or political systems that affect everything about us and our world?â
Issues Do Not Exist in Isolation
Americans have the tendency to engage issues in isolation. For the extreme (and even the mainstream) conservatives, âsocialism,â âimmigrantsâ or âgaysâ are the viruses corrupting the systemâother domestic and international considerations be damned. A matrix of interrelated issues work at one another like a neural network. One cause may have several effects. And that cause may itself be the byproduct of other variables.
âIf you want to stop hunger, you canât just go, Well, Iâll just feed somebody and itâs over,â crow argues. âYou start with that and then ask, Why are they hungry? Did they not have access to good schooling? So then we need to fix the schools or create new ones. Did they not have good access to jobs? Then we need to create good jobs with a living wage, dignity, and respect. Or did they have healthcare issues that arenât being addressed, even just basic stuff? Well then we need to get community clinics in every community so that people can have their basic needs looked at before they become major issues like cancer or diabetes.â
For this sort of education, crow had to look toward more revolutionary movements for this sort of education. âI had to look at what the Black Panthers and the Zapatistas did for their communities,â he says. âI had to look at what the Spanish anarchists did when fascism was taking over. They were inspiring in that they helped their people and rebuilt their world. Those are just political references. In every subculture, whether itâs religious groups, charities, or hip-hop communities, there are examples of people doing things themselves without waiting for government or other people to do it.â
âIn what I like to call anarchism with a little âa,â we need to explore ideas of direct action so that weâre not waiting on others to fix the problems,â he adds. âWe will do it ourselves. Mutual aid, cooperation, collective liberationâthe idea that weâre all in this together. But there also needs to be an awareness that you are in this yourself.â He points out the unvarnished political reality: no leader, party or group is going to do this for Americans. But there is a more salient point. Even if a single leader or political party had this sort of desire, the country is far too big and complex for such national policymaking. They are mere band-aids on gushing wounds. âWe need to decentralize and localize to solve the problems around us, while looking to support other communities doing the similar things and connect on larger issues,â he says. âAnd to do this we have to first look at history.â
Create Localized Economies
âItâs absolutely clichĂ© to say we need to think globally and act locally,â says crow. âBut thatâs exactly what we need to do while we are creating localized economies (gift, barter, or local currencies), opening the common spaces from the holds of corporate private property (like shopping malls) and becoming neighbors again.â
âWe need to know what is happening around the world and share the information, successes and challenges that we face in our communities to help each other,â adds crow. âWhat happens to a rice farmer in India or a landless peasant in Brazil or a family in Appalachia is of utmost importance to me in thinking of supporting each other.â The internet and social media in particular will help in this flow of information.
Perhaps the most important lesson in the recent trend of localization is that scaling down just might be what saves us. It doesnât require a singular savior but hundreds of millions, indeed billions of them. Centralized government and corporations havenât worked for humanity, argues crow. And who would disagree in this second decade of the twenty-first century?
âCentralizing corporationsâthese giant pyramids with elites at the topâarenât working out for the rest of us,â adds crow. âAnd itâs not just the 99%âitâs not working out for any of us, not even some of the elites.â
Government and industry arenât the only institutions ripe for a downsizing, according to crowâthe worldâs...