8
Heaven and Hell
When we talk about âheaven,â I wonder what kind of mental images come to mind? How do you picture it? The classic imagery is of course cherubs playing harps, sitting on clouds. Doesnât sound like lots of fun to me! But itâs interesting that when it comes to what the Bible has to say about both heaven and hellâtwo of the things that people are most interested in hearing aboutâthose are almost entirely described in âpicture-language.â Because we live in an age of science, we tend to expect the Bible to give us facts and data and technical informationâlike a textbook would. But that wasnât the expectation of people at the time the Bible was written. That doesnât make the Bible âflawedâ for that reason, itâs just that it wasnât that kind of literature. People then had different âliterary stylesâ or âgenresââdifferent ways of explaining thingsâand that included using words to âpaint pictures.â Especially when they were communicating transcendent things. We, on the other hand, tend to think that pictures and picture language are a second-best way of communicating truth. And thatâs partly because we donât value the arts as much as the sciences.
But communicating truth through pictures has a lot going for it. For one thing, pictures are âtimeless.â However much scientists discover as time goes by and we learn more and more about life and the cosmos, pictures still âspeak to usâ in a âtimelessâ way. They engage our imagination, theyâre easy to remember, and quite literally they help us to keep âthe big pictureâ in mind. Pictures also leave room for some mystery. Science is really important for human life and human well-being, but the very nature of science involves trying to get rid of mystery. And itâs certainly true that none of us wants any more mystery than we have to when it comes to diseases and health risks. But we do need some space for mystery when it comes to spiritual thingsâwhen it comes to God. We canât expect to have him under control like we want to have diseases under control.
When we approach the Bible, itâs important to give it the respect that it deserves and not to critique it for being something that it never intended to be. This includes respecting the original authors by taking account of what they were intending to be saying and not saying in what they wrote. Similarly, to respect their original audience, as to how they would have understood what was being said and what it would have meant to them at the time. Equally importantly, we need to consider the reasons that God himself may have had, as the ultimate divine author of the Bible, in choosing to convey truth through pictures and stories rather than a text book of scientific facts. We can readily imagine that part of his reasoning in choosing to speak through âtimelessâ art rather than âtime-boundâ science is that, whether weâre reading the Bible in the first century, the sixteenth century, the twenty-first century, or even the twenty-fifth century, God can still speak to us about the same truths. It doesnât require scientific knowledge from another era in order to be grasped. Of course, this is not to say that âpicturesâ are picturing something that isnât real; theyâre simply describing realities in a different way. We shall need to keep that in mind when we look at both heaven and hell in this chapter.
Heaven and the Kingdom of God
As we saw when we looked earlier at the âBig Storyâ of the Bible, the starting point for us to look at heaven is the way that God intended his creation should be and then, by contrast, the way that it ended up being. That includes how God intended we should be and how we ended up being. We saw in the creation account in Genesis that at every stageâevery âdayââGod looked at each aspect that he âspokeâ into being and said it was âgood.â And when he had finished creating, including humanity as the pinnacle, he looked at everything together and said that it was âvery good.â On the seventh day, it says God rested, which gave rise to the Jewish Sabbathâthe day on which God said to Israel that they should imitate him (as indeed, they were called to do in the whole of life) by resting from their labors (see, e.g., Exodus 20:11 and elsewhere). That day of rest was not intended simply as some kind of âpyjama dayâ of doing nothing, but a day of enjoying God and his âvery goodâ creation together.
For various reasons, centered on the infiltration of a cosmic enemy that we call âsin,â this âvery goodâ creation then became damaged and knocked off-kilter. It was an enemy that we humans collaborated with and allowed to become more powerful, to a point where the kind of creation that God designedâand the kind of people God designedâended up a long way from the blueprint. We became a creation in which a holy God could not dwell in the way that he wanted to; our incompatibility with him had become too great. It would not have been surprising, given what happened, if God were to give up on this damaged creation completely and give up on us completely. But that would, of course, have meant that this cosmic enemy had won. âSinââand the damage and suffering and death that it leads toâwould have won. God could not stand by and allow that to happen. Immediately this enemy entered the story, God declared his intention not to abandon his creation but to restore his creation. And if we then fast forward to the pivotal point in that restoration planâGod personally entering into his creation in his Son, the âturning pointâ when death itself goes into reverse and the power of sin is brokenâwe see the âfutureâ arriving in the âpresent.â This is described in the New Testament as the âcoming of the kingdom.â
People have often found it puzzling that Jesus said both that the kingdom of God had arrived in his ministry (e.g., Luke 9:2 and 11:20) and that it was still to come (e.g., Mark 9:1 and Mark 14:25). He taught his disciples to pray for the kingdom to come in what we call the Lordâs Prayer (Luke 11:2 and Matthew 6:10) even though the kingdom was among them. Theologians make sense of this apparent dichotomy through whatâs called the ânowâ and the ânot yetâ of the kingdomâor, the âalreadyâ but not yet. In other words, both are true. Jesus inaugurated or âlaunchedâ the beginning of the rule and reign of God in this world in his personal earthly ministry. However, the completion of the coming of the kingdom in all of its fullness awaits his return. Until then, we are living in a period of the ânow and the not yet,â in which we have a foretaste of the way things will be, but not its fullness. We have the âfirst-fruitsâ of the coming harvestâthe same in quality but not in quantity. Other biblical language pictures it as a âdown-paymentâ or âguarantee,â through the Holy Spirit working among us between now and then.
In both Old and New Testaments, the Bible pictures âthe way things will beâ in this future state when the kingdom has come in all its fullness. This is what we call heaven for short. Bear in mind that neither heaven nor the kingdom is referring to a place. I remember many years ago hearing a sermon in which the lay preacher asked the rhetorical question, âHow do we know that heaven is real?â and answered it with Genesis 1:1ââIn the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.â It wasnât appropriate to point out to him that this Jewish phrase âthe heavens and the earthâ had nothing to do with a place called heaven, it was simply their way of saying âthe cosmosâ or the âentire created order,â for which biblical Hebrew lacked a word.
In this present age, the kingdom is present wherever we see a foretaste of the rule and reign of God happening. Itâs wherever and whenever we see something (or someone, or someoneâs situation) coming into line with Godâs rule and reign through his divine power at workâGod supernaturally changing things from what they are to what they should be. Itâs when the future âbreaks inâ to the present. Examples of this would be Jesusâ healings and deliverancesâas a âforetasteâ of the way things will one day be in their entirety, âsignpostsâ to the fullness of that future kingdom. This is why we do well to speak of them as âsigns and wondersâ rather than simply âmiracles.â In this present era between Jesusâ first and second comings, we see the kingdom having come ânowâ in part but ânot yetâ in all its fullness. This current period has been helpfully described as being like the time between D-Day (the Normandy landings towards the end of the Second World War) that decisively broke the enemyâs grip of power and through the success of which ultimate victory was then certain and VE Day (âVictory in Europeâ Day) when that final victory could be declared as having been completed, in the enemyâs unconditional surrender. Rather than talking about âheaven,â therefore, we should really be talking about the fullness of the coming kingdom at the end of the age. Itâs OK for us to use heaven as shorthand in one sense, but given how easily it can conjure up images of cherubs, harps, and clouds, perhaps we should use it sparingly.
The picture of heaven that the Bible paints, through a variety of imagery (and Iâm using heaven here in the kingdom-sense that weâve just been discussing) has a number of features. They are all describing and reflecting a state where every enemy of human life and flourishingâeverything that has invaded and infiltrated Godâs âvery goodâ creation and caused this present disorderâhas been removed and defeated. This includes the âpersonifiedâ enemies of âSin,â âDeath,â and âSatanâ and so too, sickness, poverty, injustice, oppression, and suffering. The imagery speaks of a ânewâ creationâa cosmos that has been restored in conformity to its original design. A new creation in which there will be no more predators and no more victims. This new creation includes eternal life as an intrinsic feature because death (and everything that leads to death) will no longer be presentâso there is nothing left to bring an end to life.
At the same time as the removal of every thing that damages Godâs creation comes the removal of everyone who wants to continue to damage Godâs creation, since their continued presence is also totally incompatible with this new era, in which God both reigns and is present.
There is a linkage or âechoâ here with the biblical concept of shalom, which doesnât simply mean âpeace,â as itâs often translated. The concept has far more to do with a state of complete wholeness and well-being, âwhen the worldâs all as it should beâ (per the line in the Matt Redman song, âBlessed Be Your Nameâ).
Further biblical images, or pictures, speak of the natural world (as we would call it) also being brought into line and no longer bringing suffering and destruction in its own ways.
A Story That Starts with âOriginal Goodnessâ
The reason that this broader perspective is important is because it offers us concepts of what a restored cosmos looks like. If we simply do a Bible word-search for heaven we will miss all of this. Understanding the nature of heaven begins with Godâs promise, as soon as things started to go wrong, that one day he will put everything right. He will do that because what he said in Genesis is still...