Homelessness and the Built Environment
Designing for Unhoused Persons
Jill Pable, Yelena McLane, Lauren Trujillo
- 264 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
Homelessness and the Built Environment
Designing for Unhoused Persons
Jill Pable, Yelena McLane, Lauren Trujillo
About This Book
Winner of the 2020 IDEC award
Homelessness and the Built Environment provides a practical introduction to the effective physical design of homes and other facilities that assist unhoused persons in countries identified as middle- to high-income. It considers the supportive role that design can play for unhoused persons and other users and argues that the built environment is an equal partner alongside other therapies and programs for ending a person's state of homelessness. By exploring issues, trends, and the unique potential of built environments, this book moves the needle of what is possible to assist people experiencing trauma.
Examining important architectural and interior architectural design considerations in detail within emergency shelters, transitional shelters, permanent supportive housing, day centers, and multi-service complexes such as space planning choices, circulation and wayfinding, visibility, lighting, and materials and finishes, it provides readers with both curated conclusions from empirical knowledge and experienced designers' perspectives.
Homelessness and the Built Environment is an imperative and singular reference for interior designers, architects and building renovation sponsors, design researchers and students forging new discoveries, and policy makers who seek to assist communities affected by homelessness.
Frequently asked questions
Information
1
Introduction
- In contrast to problems like poor education or lack of sanitation, the causes of homelessness are oftentimes controversial and exclusively attributed by some to an individualās personal weaknesses or personal failings (whether accurate or not). This can create stereotyping, anger, or indifference toward afflicted persons, and this prejudice is at least partially to blame for the inconsistent or inadequate attention and funding to remedy the problem.
- For someone who has lost their housing, their new status as āhomelessā can bring them to fundamentally reconsider who they are as a person, reacting to both internal and external cues. As summarized in remarks by the United National Human Rights Council, āpeople denied water or food are rarely treated as a social group in the way homeless people are. Those who are homeless are subject to stigmatization, social exclusion and criminalizationā (United Nations Human Rights Council, 2015, p. 3).
- Homelessness can be a high-stakes predicament. Unlike a lack of education or loss of a job, lack of shelter can bring with it immediate health hazards or even death from exposure, if weather or climate conditions are severe and options for sleeping on a friendās sofa or in a vehicle do not present themselves. Homelessness demands the personās immediate attention and negatively impacts their ability to attend to long-term solutions (Mullainathan and Shafir, 2013).
- Long-term homelessness also brings significant hazards, such as an increased chance of degraded physical and mental health (National Health Care for the Homeless Council, 2018). A 2010 study of unhoused or inadequately housed Canadian citizens found that men and women had a 32 percent and 60 percent chance, respectively, of living to 75, which is below the Canadian average age expectancy of 81.1 (Ubelacker, 2018). Children who experience homelessness are more likely to develop learning disabilities, putting them behind their peers in their mental and social growth to an extent that can last a lifetime (Firth, 2014).
- For a community, the presence of a homeless population takes a toll on park services, detox centers, emergency rooms, ambulance services, and police protection. In 2012, the director of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development identified that a chronically unhoused person can cost their community between $30,000 and $50,000 per year through their use of these services (Moorhead, 2012).
- Seldom discussed, but inherent to the persistence and pervasiveness of homelessness is the loss of human potential, with hundreds of thousands of creative minds squandered as persons scramble for food, shelter, and general survival on a daily basis. People, properly cultivated and supported, can help advance a society more effectively and quickly as engaged, productive citizens offering their energy and wisdom. Prompted by his mission of helping impoverished people with services such as sewage and water treatment, GISS Technologies CEO Rob Corra undertook a thought experiment about this question. Although actual numbers are difficult to predict, he reasoned that, if one examines the 2.1 billion people currently living in extreme poverty worldwide, it is statistically likely that more than 730,000,000 of these persons have IQ scores between 120 and 176, which range from āsuperiorā, akin to the intellect of Bill Gates, to āsuper geniusā (Leonardo DaVinci). Thanks to poverty and its associated problems, we collectively lose the intellectual potential of more than 200 million people with superior intelligence or better and almost 70,000 who could be as smart as Einstein (Corra, 2015).
- Organizations often contend with precarious, inconsistent budgets that are dependent on donors and grants.
- Some supportive housing, shelters and similar facilities must use repurposed buildings, which may be wildly unsuitable to actual needs. (We have seen one shelter that offers emergency shelter within a windowless warehouse located under an interstate exchange.)
- Organizations offering assistance are sometimes so busy trying to help people to exit homelessness (often the largest and most complex crisis of their clientsā lives) that they have little time to attend to structural changes that could make their work more successful, such as the effectiveness of their physical facilities. In the words of one provider, there is no āslackā in the workload that permits reflection and progress.
- There is often an over-supply of unhoused clients whom providers must turn away or for whom aid is delayed. Need often outstrips capacity: if every emergency shelter bed and transitional housing bed were filled in the 32 U.S. cities studied in the 2016 Mayorsā Report on Hunger and Homelessness, over 34,000 persons in need would still be unsheltered on any given night (U.S. Conference of Mayors, 2016).
THE FREQUENCY OF HOMELESSNESS
Country | Estimate of unhoused persons, year recorded | Source | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
United States | 544,000, 2016 | Department of Housing and Urban Development: requires communities to submit these counts as part of their application for federal homeless assistance funds | Indicates a 12.9 percent decrease from 2009 to 2016; however, selected city increases contradict this trend |
Canada | 150,000, 2017 | Homeless Hub (2017) | 28,000 are estimated to be homeless on any given night |
United Kingdom | 78,930, 2017 | Homeless Link (2018) | 2,830 young people aged 16ā24 were accepted and classified as statutory homeless |
Australia | 116,000, 2016 | Australian Census: www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/FlagPost/2018/March/Homelessness_in_Australia; Crothers (2018) | Indicates a 14 percent increase over 5 years from 2011 to 2016 |