From Deep Incarnation to Deep Divinisation
Is the Universe a Sacrament? Denis Edwardâs Contribution to Sacramental Thinking
Niels Henrik Gregersen
At a more fundamental level still, Jesus of Nazareth is the fundamental sacrament of God in the world. He is the radical expression of, and mediation of, divine self-bestowal.
Denis Edwards.1
Abstract: The article discusses Denis Edwardsâ expansion of sacramental thinking into the view of a deep sacramental presence of Christ in the world of nature. Edwards uses Karl Rahnerâs theology as a matrix for his own thinking but I argue that he adds important new aspects to Rahnerâs sacramental theology. First, he prioritizes a deep Christology over the sacramental view of the church; second, he emphasizes a corresponding deep pneumatology, in which the Spirit of God opens up human minds for experiencing grace in our interactions with nature. Edwardsâ view of the sacramentality of nature is in line with the Encyclical Laudato siâ from 2015, which sees the world of creation as âa sacrament of communionâ but his emphasis on the interaction between human beings and nature leads him to a more concrete approach to events of grace within that communion.
Keywords: Denis Edwards; Karl Rahner; Paul Tillich; Laudato siâ, deep incarnation; sacramental theology
âDo we experience God in our encounters with birds, animals, tree, forests, mountains, deserts and beaches?â Denis Edwards raises this question in an essay on human experiences of Word and Spirit in the world of nature,2 and he responds in the affirmative, based on theological arguments derived from Athanasius and Karl Rahner. Edwards brings in his own spiritual experiences with engrossing landscapes and rivers on the Australian continent too. He is not a Romanticist with a rosey view of nature, however, for he is fully aware of the ambiguities of nature. Since all life is lived at the expense of other life, mother Earth is not only a space for positive experiences of wonder and beauty but also a space of pain and suffering. âThe natural world is both unspeakably beautiful and also a place of competition and violence.â3 While already empirical observations point to the mixture of joy and woe in nature, evolutionary theory shows its inescapability. Since God is the source of all that is, theology too has to acknowledge that joy and pain are interconnected in the development of living organisms. In the uncompromising words of the Danish philosopher-theologian KE Løgstrup, âthe Creator has coupled development and decay together in His creation . . . Godâs act of creation is terrifying in its splendor and annihilation; it exceeds our intellectual and emotional apprehension.â4
The fact that nature is indeed a mixed package seems to foreclose any reference to the nature as a sacrament. Indeed, Edwards nowhere declares that nature is a sacrament in the strict sense of the term, fully in parallel to the sacraments of the church, which are accompanied by an unambiguous divine promise of salvation. Yet Edwards insists that people sometimes do encounter Godâeven the gracious presence of God the Father, Son and Spiritâin their everyday encounters with nature. And he is arguing that since the co-suffering of Christ is present in the midst of our cruciform creation, there is a sacramental presence of Christ also in states of decay and pain.
So, what is the difference between saying that nature simply is a sacrament, and saying that we need to extend our sacramental thinking so that we can receive the grace of God in our encounters with nature too, in joy as well as in woe? What is the difference between being a sacrament and having the potential of becoming a sacrament? What are the differences and continuities between the sacramental potentials of nature, and the sacraments of the church? These are the questions to be explored in this essay.
Denis Edwardsâ View of Sacramentality: The Inspiration from Athanasius
In his sacramental thinking, Denis Edwards often goes along with two of his principal theological sources, bishop Athanasius of Alexandria (c 298â373) and Karl Rahner, SJ (1904â1984). Athanasius has played a growing role in Denis Edwardsâ work, as can be seen in many essays from recent years.5 Yet the theology of Karl Rahner has been the companion of Denis Edwards throughout, and I will therefore go into more detail with his reception of Rahner, noting what he is takes in from Rahner, what he does not receive, and what he adds of his own to Rahnerâs work. As I will argue, only the encyclical Laudato siâ, issued by Pope Francis at Pentecost 2015, provides the broader perspective for Denis Edwardsâ view of the sacramentality of the world of creation.
With Athanasius, Edwards underlines the immediacy of Godâs Wisdom/Word to each creature individually, and in sustaining the body of the world at large.6 In Athanasiusâ anti-Arian theology, there exists no intermediary buffers between the Triune God and the world of creation; rather, the deep unity between Godâs creation of the cosmos and Godâs saving presence in the incarnate Word and through the divine Spirit is the fundamental Christian assumption. The Fatherâs love of humanity (philanthropia) can only be mediated only by the immediacy of God Godself, that is, by the incarnation of the same divine Logos by which the world was brought into being from the beginning. In Godâs incarnational reach, Godâs own Son, Word or Wisdom, comes down to earth to live with and for the creatures, and through full re-connection of the divine Logos with the whole of creation, the Spirit of God lifts up the world of creation into participation with the Triune God. âEvery creature on Earth, every whale, every sparrow and every earthworm exists by participation in the Father through the Son and in the Spiritânot one of them is forgotten in Godâs sight (Lk 12:6).â7
Sacramentality and Deep Incarnation: Karl Rahner and Denis Edwards
With Karl Rahner, Edwards shares the emphasis on the âmysticism of everyday lifeâ.8 Rahnerâs view of the self-endowment of the transcendent God in the world of creation may be said to undergird Edwardsâ understanding of the universe as having a potential sacramental value for human beings, that is, a potential for becoming an effective medium of divine grace by the divine Spirit.
Let us now take a look at Denis Edwardsâ own understanding of the sacraments: âIn Christian theology, a sacrament is a visible sign and agent of divine self-bestowal.â9 The underlying thrust of Denis Edwardsâ Rahner-inspired thinking may be rendered as follows: Since (1) the transcendent God is radically present in the world by the divine self-bestowal, and since (2) no natural event is without the grace of the self-giving God, (3) no theologian is entitled to say that natural events cannot become embodied carriers of divine grace for human beings. I here phrase this underlying argument cautiously, since it only says that there no barriers to the access of grace, no divine self-withdrawal involved in Godâs self-giving, even though the world of nature, as we saw above, remains ambiguous. Therefore, I suggest to make distinction between affirming the sacramental potentials of nature while not equating the sacramental potentials of nature with the sacraments of the church. For only the latter are accompanied with the divine promise, or donor intention, that the grace of God is offered in the message and sacraments of church in unambiguous form.10 While the divine grace is omnipresent in Rahner, it is not omnimanifest, we may say.
Denis Edwards, too, takes his point of departure in the concrete sacraments before discussing the sacramental presence of Christ in the universe. The prime instances of sacrament are to be found in the midst of the life of Christian communities, like Baptism and the Eucharist. These are the sacraments in the proper sense, since they are accompanied by the promise of the self-donating God that will be present there for us. On this basis Edwards presents the Roman-Catholic view that âthe church itself has a sacramental nature. It is a sign and agent of communion with God and of human community, called to be the universal sacrament of salvationâ.11 This is fully in line with Rahner too, but it is worth noting some subtle differences of emphasis. First, Rahner consistently writes the Church with capital letters with reference to the hierarchical body of the Roman-Catholic Church, while Edwards omits any reference to the church as having a particular social shape with a particular âjuridical compositionâ, as Rahner puts it.12 Second, Edwards refers to the âcallingâ of the church to be a sacrament for all people, rather than simply stating a given fact. Third, and in the same line, Edwards omits any reference to Rahnerâs view that the sacraments of the Church are visible and efficient means of grace that are at work ex opere operato, that is, valid prior to and independently from the individual reception of grace. Fourth, and most importantly: While Rahner views the Church as the âprimary sacrament of the grace of Godâ,13 Edwards is very clear in stating that it is Christ who is the primary sacrament:
At a more fundamental level still, Jesus of Nazareth is the fundamental sacrament of God in the world. He is the radical expression of, and mediation of, divine self-bestowal. As the incarnate Word and Wisdom of God, he is the sacrament of divine self-bestowal in the world. He is the real symbol of God, in which God is manifested and acts in a world of matter and flesh.14
Edwards here appropriates ...