To Hell or Barbados

The ethnic cleansing of Ireland

Sean O'Callaghan

• Publisher: Brandon
• Year: 2013
• ISBN:
  9781847175960
• Topic: Social Sciences
• Subtopic: Ethnic Studies
• Index: Social Sciences

A vivid account of the Irish slave trade: the previously untold story of over 50, 000 Irish men, women and children who were transported to Barbados and Virginia.

CHAPTER ONE

The Effusion of Blood

“I am persuaded that this is a righteous judgement of God upon these barbarous wretches, who have imbrued their hands in so much innocent blood and that it will tend to prevent the effusion of blood for the future.”

Letter written by Oliver Cromwell after Drogheda (1649)

THE CIVIL WAR in England was over. Many of the vanquished Cavaliers lay in jails and lock-ups, there to await transportation to Barbados. After the execution of Charles I and the ending of the monarchy, a new republic was established with Oliver Cromwell as first president of its Council of State. Its forty members were mainly merchants, with a sprinkling of lawyers and army officers.

Many problems faced the new Commonwealth. There was discontent in the country and problems with the army, including a mutiny in Banbury and at Salisbury among the troops destined for Ireland. This mutiny was quelled by Cromwell and Sir Thomas Fairfax, who had three of the ringleaders shot.

Cromwell’s greatest preoccupation, however, was with Ireland. Since the beheading of the king and resignation of the royalist lord lieutenant of Ireland, James Butler, Earl of Ormonde, his greatest fear was that all classes of Irishman, Protestant and Catholic alike, would unite to invade England.

If we do not endeavour to make good our interest there, and that timely, we shall not only have … our interest rooted out there, but they will in a very short time be able to land forces in England and to put us to trouble here… I had rather be overrun with a Cavalierish interest than a Scotch interest; I had rather be overrun with a Scotch interest than an Irish; and I think of all this is most dangerous. If they shall be able to carry on their work, they will make this the most miserable people in the earth, for all the world knows their barbarism.

This amply shows Cromwell’s frame of mind before leaving for Ireland. His fear was that the young Charles, who had been declared king in Scotland immediately after his father’s death, would land in Ireland, rally the people to the royalist cause and lead an invasion to England. In the summer of 1649 it seemed to Cromwell that Ireland had become a royalist state and the prospects of a successful English invasion of that country were receding with every passing day.

On 15 March 1649 the Council of State nominated him to command the troops for the invasion of Ireland. Cromwell hesitated for several reasons. In the first place his health had not been good since the previous Christmas, when he had a breakdown. He was also determined that he should have a free hand in Ireland and that the forces under his command would be properly equipped and provided for as he did not want soldiers to follow him out of personal loyalty. Finally, on 30 March, he accepted the nomination, saying that: “It matters not who is our commander-in-chief if God be so.”

All was now set for the invasion of Ireland and the reconquest of a country from the “barbarous wretches” who had spilled “so much innocent blood” in the rebellion of 1641. In 1641, eight years before his invasion of Ireland, the Irish rose in rebellion against the English and Scottish planters who had seized their lands during the Elizabethan plantations. The rebellion began in Ulster, which was the most heavily planted, and soon spread throughout the country until only Dublin and Derry remained in English hands. At the beginning of this rebellion only peasants took part, armed with pikes and pitchforks. They fell upon the settlers, killing men, women and children indiscriminately.

Sir John Temple, who was in Dublin Castle at the time the rebellion broke out, wrote in his History of the Horrid Rebellion in Ireland (1646): “The crisis burst upon us with the suddenness of a violent torrent…” He claimed that the rebels, inflamed by Jesuits, did “march on furiously destroying all the English, sparing neither sex nor age, most barbarously murdering them, and that with greater cruelty than was ever used among Turks or Infidels”.

Sir John Temple gave the figure of those killed as 100,000; Dr Bate, a royalist who later changed sides to become Cromwell’s personal physician, described the Irish as “a mixed rabble, part papist and part savages, guilty in the highest degree of all those crimes”, and gave the number of settlers slain as 200,000. W.E. Lecky’s History of Ireland, published in the middle of the eighteenth century, gave the number of those killed as 4000, which is today accepted as being closer to the true figure.

King Charles I believed the exaggerated accounts of the massacre and accompanying atrocities committed by the Irish and instructed his forces in Ireland “to prosecute the Rebels and Traitors with fire and sword”. He also sent a message to Parliament that he intended to put himself at the head of an army and go to Ireland “to chastise those wicked and detestable rebels, odius to God and all good men”. Parliament replied that it would consider his departure from England equal to a formal abdication of the throne. Charles stayed. Bulstrode Whitelocke, a member of the House, said that the Irish would be rooted out by a new and overwhelming plantation of English and that another England would be speedily found in Ireland. The Lords of the Council ordered Lord Ormonde, then lieutenant general of the army in Ireland, “to burn, spoil, waste, consume, destroy and demolish all the places, towns and houses where the said rebels are … and to kill and destroy all the men there inhabiting able to bear arms”.

That there were massacres of Protestants by Catholics in the early days of the rebellion cannot be denied; they were perpetrated by the peasantry whose hatred for the settlers was endemic. The leaders of the rebellion, Rory O’Moore, Lord Maguire, Sir Phelim O’Neill and others, soon brought them under control. It was not what actually happened that mattered, however, but what the English believed had taken place.

The Irish seemed, to Englishmen of that time, of a lower race. To Cromwell it was to be a contest between the honest English and the murderous and treacherous Irish. Pamphlets published before and during the English Civil War fuelled the hatred of the English for the Irish. They were depicted as a subhuman species, undeserving of pity or mercy. An extract from one of these pamphlets is sufficient to show the virulence of the hatred that the Puritans had for the Irish people:

These Irish, anciently called Anthropophagi (maneaters), have a tradition among them, that when the devil showed our Saviour all the kingdoms of the earth and their glory he would not show him Ireland, but reserved it for himself … They are the very offal of men, dregs of mankind, reproach of Christendom, the bots that crawl on the beast’s tail…

I beg upon my hands and knees that the expedition against them may be undertaken whilst the hearts and hands of our soldiery are hot. To whom I will be bold to say briefly: Happy is he who shall reward them as they have served us; and cursed is he that shall do the work of the Lord negligently. Cursed be he that holdeth back his sword from blood; yea, cursed be he that maketh not his sword drunk with Irish blood.

Many Irish soldiers crossed over to England and took part on the king’s side during the Civil War. On 24 October 1644, Parliament passed an ordinance that “no quarter shall henceforth be given to any Irishman or papist born in Ireland captured on land or at sea”. In the same year a Captain Swanley, a naval officer fighting for Parliament, captured a ship out of Dublin bound for Bristol with seventy Irish soldiers and two women aboard. He threw them all overboard, tied back to back. One of the London papers, the Perfect Diurnall, wrote approvingly of Captain Swanley’s action and stated that he “made water rats of the papish vermin”. Parliament acclaimed his action and presented Captain Swanley with a gold chain worth £200.

When the parliamentarians under Colonel Thomas Mytton captured Shrewsbury in February 1645, they took fifty Irish prisoners. Mytton selected twelve by lot and hanged them in the town square. In retaliation Prince Rupert ordered the hanging of thirteen Roundheads taken at Oswestry. Parliament protested vigorously against this “outrage” and ordered the Earl of Essex to explain to Rupert that “there was a very great difference between Englishmen and Irishmen”. Sir William Brereton hanged every Irish prisoner he took, saying that the Irish soldiers “deserved the noose because they were guilty of great spoils and cruelties… horrid rapes and insolencies”. Oliver Cromwell concluded that hanging the Irish was “a righteous judgement of God upon these barbarous wretches”.

It is not necessary to go too much into the convoluted state of Irish politics before the arrival of Cromwell in Ireland. The Irish were, as usual, divided. Thomas Carlyle, the nineteenth century historian, wrote of them, “Parties on the back of Parties, at war with the world and with each other.” In overall command of the royalists was James Butler, twelth Earl of Ormonde. The Butlers were an old Anglo-Irish Catholic family, but Ormonde was a Protestant, having been made a ward of court and raised in England. In his army, three of his Catholic brothers and several cousins held high commands. Canon O’Rourke in his The Battle of the Faith in Ireland (1887) wrote:

Undoubtedly Ormonde was a man of great parts. His weakest point was, perhaps, the want of high military talents; but as for diplomacy—that is plotting—he was a veritable Palmerston born before his time … Ormonde hated the Catholic religion with an intensity which can only belong to a pervert … the old Irish whom Ormonde and all Palesmen looked upon as an alien and inferior race, unfit for the same rights and priviledges as Englishmen…

Under him served Murrough O’Brien, Lord Inchiquin. He had a varied career: in early life he was a soldier of fortune, serving in the Spanish army in Italy. He was appointed vice-president of Munster by Charles I. When the rebellion of 1641 broke out, he became the scourge of rebels in Munster, sacking and burning, killing and hanging. On the refusal of the king to grant him the presidency of Munster, he joined the parliamentary army and for some years devoted all his energies and military skill to securing that province for the parliamentarians. Inchiquin was responsible for the sacking of Cashel in which he and his men slaughtered the defenders, although he had previously promised them quarter. A short time later he again changed sides, but was not as active on behalf of the king as he had been for the parliamentarians. Because he was a turncoat so many times, he was never really trusted by the Irish; in fact, he was still remembered for his fierce and unrelenting hatred of the Catholic Church. He was known to the Irish as “Murrough the burner”. His army was mainly made up of Protestants of English origin.

The Catholic Confederation of Kilkenny, which was set up in 1643, also had a standing army. The pope sent Cardinal Giovanni Battista Rinuccini as papal nuncio to the Confederation in 1645. He was warmly welcomed by some of the officers of the Confederation, including Richard Butler, the brother of the Earl of Ormonde. Rinuccini reported: “At the time of my arrival the greater part of the Catholic troops were under the command of two generals, Owen O’Neill and Thomas Preston, … who were not only rivals by nature, and from party spirit, but embittered by jealousy from having both served in the Flemish wars, and from having even then shown signs of mutual aversion.”

Owen Roe O’Neill was a scion of the great Clan O’Neill, one of his forebears being Niall of the Nine Hostages who had raided Gaul for slaves. O’Neill, although born in Ireland, was taken to Spain as a child and entered the Spanish army in his youth. He was transferred to the Netherlands in the Spanish service in 1625 and was regarded as one of their ablest commanders there. He returned to Ireland in 1642, assumed command of his northern clansmen and fought the English troops who were devastating the country after the rebellion of 1641.

Ormonde strove to bring O’Neill over to the royalist side, pointing out that now peace had been made between himself and the Catholic Confederation, they should all unite against the common enemy—the parliamentarians. O’Neill hesitated and was proclaimed by the Confederation “a traitor and a rebel”. He wrote to Cardinal Rinuccini: “We are almost reduced to despair. On the one hand Ormonde entreats us to join him; on the other, the Parliamentary party seeks our friendship. God knows we hate and detest both alike!”

O’Neill’s hatred of Ormonde was such that he eventually joined the parliamentary forcers, under General Monck (or Monk, as it was sometimes spelled). The general gave certain assurances to him, granting him and his men indemnity for the past and assurances that their religion and estates would be respected. O’Neill also received thirty barrels of powder with matches and bullets, 300 cows and £400 in cash, all on condition that he should march to the relief of Derry, then besieged by royalists. O’Neill joined “Butcher” Coote’s parliamentary army to lift the siege, but the royalists withdrew on his approach. Sir Charles Coote was the other commander of the parliamentary forces in Ireland, and his father was notorious for his atrocities towards the Irish rebels of 1641. It is all the more surprising, therefore, that Owen Roe O’Neill was prepared to enter an alliance with such a man. The alliance between O’Neill and the parliamentarians did not last long. Monck was recalled from Ireland and imprisoned in the Tower for entering into this alliance with O’Neill; Coote escaped with a reprimand. The arrival of Cromwell forced O’Neill and Ormonde to join forces, but it was too late to have any effect on the campaign there.

On 17 January 1649 a peace was concluded between Ormonde, acting on behalf of Charles I, and the General Assembly of the Confederation. A few days after the signing of this treaty, the news of the king’s execution reached Ireland. Ormonde had the Prince of Wales proclaimed king under the title of Charles II. Almost the whole of Ireland supported this move, and for a time the leaders of the various parties forgot their differences.

There were two parliamentary armies in Ireland at the time under the overall command of General Charles Coote, whose father, also a general, was killed by Irish rebels in Trim in 1642. General Monck commanded the other parliamentary army. He was an old campaigner who had fought in most of the battles of the Civil War in England.

There is no doubt, with hindsight, that Ormonde was unfitted for the overall command of the royalist armies. On seeing a portrait of him, Cromwell is reported to have remarked that he looked more like a count...