1
Theology as a Contextual Exercise
A salient feature of the field of contextual theology is the quest for rediscovering an essential nature of Christian theology: contextualityâmodes of being and expression that are conditioned by a communityâs context. Here, the word âcontextâ is used broadly as an umbrella term that encompasses the history, culture (e.g., way of life, language, thought, and intellectual capital), and contemporary state affairs (e.g., life situation and social location). Christian theologyâs contextuality reminds us that a context orients Christian communities towards a particular way of seeing, interpreting, constructing, and appropriating their knowledge of God-world relations. This chapter discusses Christian theologyâs contextuality, the features and forms of contextual theology, and the tasks of contextual theologians.
A gathering of twenty-two theologians in 1976, mainly from Africa, Asia, and Latin America meeting in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), would later become a watershed conference that nudged some theologians to explore the common theological and social concerns of African, Asian, and Latin American Christians. In their communiqué, the attendees of the conference hammered out four objectives that were embedded in their theological questions and quests. These would serve as the guidelines for their future ecumenical theological explorations:
- Sharing with one another the present trends of interpretation of the gospel in different Third World countries, particularly bearing in mind the roles of theology in relation to other faiths and ideologies as well as the struggle for a just society.
- Promoting the exchange of theological views through writings in the books and periodicals of Third World countries.
- Promoting the mutual interaction between theological formulation and social analysis.
- Keeping close contacts as well as being involved with action-oriented movements for social change.
In these objectives, one can discern a team spirit and camaraderie among the theologians, highlighted by the controversial term âThird World.â They shared the desire to challenge colonialism, economic exploitation, domination of foreign powers, and racism in their continents from a Christian theological vantage point. Given that the theologians shared a similar interest in contextual theologizing, albeit for different reasons and at varying degrees, one should not be surprised that the concerns for a âjust society,â âsocial analysis,â and âaction-oriented movements for social changeâ formed the building blocks of the four objectives. In the âFinal Statement,â they reiterated the concerns: âWe . . . are convinced that those who bear the name of Christ have a special service to render to the people of the whole world who are now in an agonizing search for a new world order based on justice, fraternity, and freedom.â The document also states: âWe have reflected from our experience as belonging to the oppressed men and women of the human race. We seriously take cognizance of the cultural and religious heritage of the peoples of the continents of Asia, Africa, and Latin America.â Though only one of the theologians examined in this book (Gustavo GutiĂ©rrez) was present at the conference in Dar es Salaam, the theological vision of the conference has partly given the impetus for the genre and also the scope of theological exploration I undertake in this book.
Several theological presuppositions derived from Christian Scripture underlie this book, of which three are noteworthy. Firstly, the Christian view of divine revelationâGodâs decision to reveal Godâs mode of being and operating in the world in ways that are recognizable to human beingsâought to deter Christians from engaging in unfruitful speculations about Godâs identity. Therefore, the God invoked in the Christian faith should not be construed as merely a hypothetical concept proposed by Christians as a point of departure in their explorations of the mystery of human existence. On the contrary, the Christian God, as expressed in Christian Scripture, assumes Godâs self-disclosure through mediated and contextualized avenues. The writer of Hebrews puts it this way:
The guiding theological question about the Christian God in the field of contextual theology ought not be: What is the individual essence of the Christian God? A more appropriate question should be: Why the Christian God? To put it differently, why this God that Christians pray to, believe in, sing to, and worship? The âwhyâ question is not really about epistemic rightsâthe rights of Christians as members of a particular religious community to propose a particular God as a theory for explaining the origins of the cosmos. On the contrary, it is about epistemic praxisâknowledge of doingâthat is grounded in a mediated divine presence embodied by Jesus Christ who summons his followers to participate, as a form of worship, in the work of healing the ills of this world (see Matt 5:13â16; cf. John 17; Eph 2:8â10; Jas 2:14â19).
Secondly, Christian theology is in some ways a commentary on Christiansâ beliefs about Godâs proclamation of good news to this world (John 3:16), which is embodied by Jesus of Nazareth (Luke 4:16â21). He should be Christiansâ window on Godâs mediated presence in the world (Heb 1:1â4). Philipâs request: âLord, show us the Father and that will be enough for usâ and Jesusâs response: âAnyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, âShow us the Fatherâ?â (John 14:8â9 NIV) suggests that Christian theology will be overreaching itself if its aim is to penetrate the unmediated mystery of Godâs presence and identity. The apostle Paul warned Christians in Corinth against the illusion of those who think they can penetrate the unmediated and unrevealed mystery of God thorough theological reflections and through their spiritual gifts (1 Cor 13:8â12).
Thirdly, as an essential component of the Christian life, theologizing should be grounded in a commitment to explore and experience a relationship with God (the Triune God, in Christian parlance) and a commitment to neighborsâthat is, all humans, since all human beings, as Christian Scripture teaches, are creatures and imagers of God (see Gen 1:26â27; 5:1; Mark 12:29â31). Theologizing becomes a commitment to God when it is done for the purpose of glorifying God and promoting the worship of God. Theologizing becomes a commitment to human neighbors when it is done to promote the well-beingâspiritual, mental, physical, economic, and social healthâof people. Given this commitment to human neighbors, grassroots Christian theologiesâthe theologies that are being worked out daily largely by Christians with no formal theological educationâshould be of prime concern to theo...