Part I
Theoretical Background
1
Researching Complex Effects of International Relations
While it is increasingly common for political scientists to describe world affairs as a complex arena of roundabout ramifications, they often employ the substantial concept of indirect consequences narrowly and without careful elaboration. Analysts are increasingly inclined to invoke the concept, but clear definitions of it are rare.
This book suggests an extension of the subject of indirect consequences and tackles complex effects of international relations, or the simple but rather stark reality that foreign policy activities can produce more than just direct or linear outcomes. A range of examples in the book backs up the theoretical argument presented here from the vantage point of the Middle East, dating from the end of World War II through the Cold War era, to the present day. Complex effects of international relations relate to various indirect and circuitous, intended as well as unintended consequences of human actions in Middle East conflicts. They can be desirable or undesirable, overt or covert, anticipated or surprising, foreseeable but unanticipated, and anticipated but simultaneously ignored or discounted.
On the global scale, complex effects occur because of real-time interaction between the systemâs structure and the countries and individuals acting within itâthis interaction plays out in ways that cannot be precisely predicted because the effects themselves are nonlinear in nature. In the context of this study, Robert Jervisâs definition of a system is employed: â(a) a set of units or elements that are inter-connected so that changes in some elements or their relations produce changes in other parts of the system, and (b) the entire system exhibits properties and behaviors that are different from those of the parts.â
Understanding complex effects of international relations systematically requires a focus on two primary themes. The first and more prevalent category is unintended consequences, which refers to purposive human procedures and activities that result in surprising, unforeseen, or unexpected outcomes. This is not to be confused with a situation in which purposive actions fail to achieve their intended consequences; indeed, that would fall outside of the scope of the category of unintended consequences. Instead, this category includes outcomes of policy decisions that were not purposely elicited or intended by the actors who planned the intervention. The first theme includes two subcategories both of which are unforeseen repercussions different from the actorâs initial intentions: (1) rebound results, or human actions, that themselves turn out to be detrimental or costly, with an impact that worsens the situation, and (2) derivative products, or human actions with side effects that can be positive, neutral, or negative.
The second theme of complex effects of international relations is intended consequences in which an intervention is designed to bring about certain changes but in an indirect and roundabout manner. Within this category are circuitous but intended outcomes, which refers to the planned and anticipated outcomes of purposive actions that are complementary to the actorâs goalâessentially a nonlinear set of actions utilized on purpose to achieve aims indirectly.
Rebound results are not the same as derivative products nor are they similar to circuitous but intended outcomes. Both rebound results and derivative products are the particular effects of actions purposely carried out but which are different from those effects desired at the moment the actions were carried out or from the original aim and desire behind the acts. Circuitous but intended outcomes, on the other hand, are purposive actions aimed to indirectly and sometimes craftily achieve certain desired goals.
It is clear, then, that not all complex effects of international relations are undesirable. The paradoxical outcomes of actions in world politics are not necessarily harmful or unwanted. This is a reality reflected by the category of derivative products, which includes positive and neutral side effects as well as the category of circuitous but intended outcomes. The United States, for example, has been in many cases positively transformed by its major wars. The end of slavery, for instance, was obviously a circuitous but intended outcome of the Civil War.
Within the realm of international relations there are several distinctions when analyzing the outcomes of actions. Some complex effects are good, some are neutral, and some are harmful. Still, the majority of complex effects in world affairs are unpleasantly rather than pleasantly surprising.
The Study in Context: Related Research
The phenomenon of complex effects explored in this study is constantly at work within the social and political spheres; it is a continual subject of study for a range of practical and academic disciplines. Within the field of social science, however, the concept has been recognized more narrowly as âunintended consequences.â Unintended consequences are generally understood to refer to the fact that any intervention in a complex system may or may not produce the results intended and will instead inevitably create unanticipated and often undesirable outcomes.
Karl Marx was the first to conceive of social theory as the study of the unwanted social repercussions of nearly all our actions. He believed that the âsystem of economic relationsâ could be explained in terms of âthe means of production,â rather than in terms of individuals, their relations, or their actionsâall of which, Marx argued, give rise to unwanted consequences.
Karl Popper, on the other hand, holds that institutions and traditions must be analyzed in terms of individuals acting in certain situations and the unintended consequences of their actions. According to Popper, the main task of social science is to analyze the unintended social repercussions of human actions. Hannah Arendt also observed that politics is in the realm of unintended consequences.
Robert Jervis, in his classic study System Effects, presents the most comprehensive statement of the broad notion of complex effects. His work, however, misses two significant points, which this book addresses. First, contrary to the common cause-effect relationships described in the majority of social sciences, Jervis observes that we actually live in a world where all things are interconnected, where unintended consequences of our actions are unavoidable and essentially unpredictable. Building on that premise, the first significant contribution of this book is to reveal that despite the complexity of the international world politics surrounding us, many complex effects of international relations are, in fact, predictable, and for that reason, avoidable, and in some cases even achievable if desired and well implemented.
Second, while Jervisâs theoretical applications are principally applied to international politics, the diversity of examples and subject matter he employs in his study are mainly drawn from society and the natural universe, applying his argument as a general social and scientific philosophy. Consequently, the second important contribution of this book is the development of a systemic and scientific analysis of this subject with an argument that focuses precisely on international politics, especially in the Middle East region. This, in turn, could potentially provide a useful mechanism for avoiding some of the negative and harmful consequences of human actions and in particular the devastating results of many Western countriesâ actions in relation to and within the developing world.
While few students of world affairs would deny the proposition that political systems are complex, many current theories and models of international relations rely on a simple system and are âreposed in deep Newtonian slumber.â Linear ways of thinking tackle problems as if elements in world politics could be dealt with in remote isolation. Such solutions are bound to fail in the complex sphere of world politics where interactions can often produce complex effects.
When navigating through the complex system of world politics, complex effectsâat least in the context of this studyâare actually the normal outcome of such a structure; they should not come as a surprise. Unexpectedly, however, there are only a small number of studies within the international relations field that directly and extensively deal with this phenomenon. One well-known study explores the security dilemmaââa stateâs defensive search for security that can have the perverse effect of leading to greater insecurity by triggering an open-ended cycle of moves and countermoves.â
Sociologists, economists, historians, physicists, and others are all familiar with the universal concept of complex effects. They have recognized the existence and the influence of complex effects for many years having explored the subject extensively. Nevertheless, regardless of the theoretical and empirical importance of the general idea of complex effects in the world of academia, the conceptâs presence within the field of international relations is limited.
Consequently, the phenomenon has yet to be sufficiently examined, theoretically organized, or synthesized exclusively by political scientists, and it still awaits a systemic and systematic analysis that solely relates to the field of international relations. This book, therefore, attempts to shed light on the complex intended and desired, as well as the complex unintended and undesired, repercussions of human actions carried out by international players within the changing and shifting realm of world politics.
Definitions, Methodology, and Contents
Many political scientists have not yet come to terms with the perversity of ordinary actions within world politics. Hence, one of this studyâs main purposes is to introduce a typology of complex effects of international relations.
Before continuing my discussion of complex effects of international relations it is important to define some key terms that will be widely used in the rest of the book.
For the purpose of the study, effects, consequences, results, products, outcomes, and in some cases also fallouts and ends, are interchangeable terms.
Unintended effects are not part of the agentâs goal-directed behavior but rather flow from those behaviors. Intended effects signify those results that one specifically aims to bring about.
Some complex effects might be beneficial from the agentâs point of viewâboth circuitous but intended results and also derivative products with positive side effects. Other complex effects could be harmful from the agentâs point of viewâboth rebound results, which damage the initiator, and derivative products with negative side effects, which mistakenly damage the initiator in other places and/or other timesâor damage others, enemies and friends alike. Moreover, such complex effects, positive as well as negative, may oftenâalthough not alwaysâbe foreseen.
For the purposes of my discussion, immediate effects will include consequences that follow directly after the action itselfâfor instance, a building damaged by a missile. More remote effects may be termed mediate in that they come about only through the intervention of someone or something else.
Additionally, complex effects of international relations are not limited to only the desired and undesired consequences of our purposely chosen actions. Also, to be considered, are the foreseeable effects of inactions. Decision makers could decide not to implement certain actions and they could be held responsible for the harmful complex effects that will emerge as a result.
Within the realm of academia, understanding is often sought for its own sake without further practical application. However, this study seeks to combine theory with a policy-oriented approach in order to understand the unique phenomenon of complex effects of international relations with the aim of making suitable policy recommendations. This study is comprised of a hypothesis of international relations that begins with assumptions about the way individual leaders make foreign policy decisions and extends to a macroassessment of how these decisions emerge to form particular historical processes and desirable as well as predicted outcomes. The types of outcomes are a function of the interplay of variables on a number of levels.
Th...