Chapter
What Are We For?
Trevin Wax
âThou shalt not look at porn.â
If you dig into the Bible looking for a clear-cut prohibition of pornography, youâll come up empty. That doesnât mean God is okay with it, of course. A wise reader of Scripture sets the practice of viewing pornography next to multiple biblical principles, and it is those principles that lead us to the conclusion that God stands against this behavior.
Pornography is a vice that touches on many aspects of human sinfulness: the glorification of sex outside of marriage, the objectification of other human beings made in Godâs image, the fanning of the flames of lust, and the indulgence of our worst instincts. Because of these aspects of human sin, most people have an undefined, yet accurate understanding that the Bible condemns pornographic imagery. Itâs why we speak of pornography as something dangerous, something to avoid, an addictive indulgence that warps and distorts our sexuality.
âKeep Awayâ Is Not Enough
The response of the church is simple: âKeep away!â Discussions about pornography often resemble the skull and crossbones you see on bottles of poison, a warning about the damage that can be done by whatever is inside. Death is in this bottle, says the label.
I resonate with the starkness of this kind of warning. Like almost all men today (and an increasing number of women), Iâve seen pornography, felt the power of its allure, and have witnessed its devastating consequences. Iâve seen marriages dissolve under the weight of betrayal and distrust. Iâve walked alongside others who have asked for support in their struggle to overcome pornographic addiction. Iâve signed up myself, and others, for Internet filters and accountability programs.
But what if weâre missing an opportunity here? What if, in our ânoâ to pornography, weâre missing the chance to show what the Bible says âyesâ to? What if our attention gets so focused on avoiding sexual sin that we fail to see the beauty of sexuality, as defined by our Creator?
I donât recommend we soften our ânoâ to pornography in the least. The response to youthful temptation is to flee, just as the apostle Paul commanded and the Old Testament character Joseph demonstrated. There are times when you donât fight or try to stay afloat, when temptation is not to be trifled with. You change the situation. You flee the place where temptation is hounding you. Pornography is that kind of temptation.
But alongside our ânoâ to pornography must come the Bibleâs âyesâ to sexual expression within the marital union. The Bible doesnât start with âno.â The Bible doesnât explicitly address pornography at all. Instead, Godâs Word gives us a bigger story, and within that overarching story line, the use of pornography becomes something unthinkable.
No one who takes the Bible seriously will arrive at the conclusion that pornography is acceptable for Christiansâsomething to shrug your shoulders at, as if it is something to be expected as boys come of age. No. âBoys will be boysâ is not a phrase found in Scripture. The biblical command is to âact like menâ and âflee youthful lusts.â The world sees porn as something to be managed; the Bible sees it as something to be killed.
Pornography within the Story of Godâs Good World
The purpose of this opening chapter is to dig a little deeper into the story of Godâs good world. Here we find a drama that unfolds from the first book of the Bible until the last. A glorious marriage between a man and woman opens the Bibleâs story of humanity, and a glorious marriage of heaven and earth, and of Jesus and His bride brings about the closing of this age and the beginning of Godâs never-ending sequel.
Within the context of this story, we come to understand why pornography makes no sense when compared to Godâs good design. But we also discover the reasons why pornography maintains such a powerful pull on people today.
So, moving forward, we will start by looking at Godâs design as set out at the creation of this world. Then, we will look at how humanity has fallen into sin, and how this sinfulness results in the distortion of beauty, sexuality, and human relationships. Finally, we will see the radical response to sexual sin that signifies the presence of Godâs redemption in our lives. All this will prepare the way for the writers of the next chapters to dig deeper into how we can respond with the power of the gospel to the powerful allure of pornography.
Scan the dial on your radio or browse the music video channels on YouTube and youâll hear song after song after song extolling the beauty of love. Pop songs, rock songs, country songs, and jazzâno matter the genre, we call them âlove songsâ for a reason. The romantic spark between a man and a woman ignites all the senses and stirs up the deepest emotions in us.
âLove songsâ run the gamut of emotion. There are songs of puppy love, songs that express oneâs initial desire, songs of rugged commitment, songs of exclusive devotion. Then, there are the âbreak-up songsââlyrics about feeling alone, protests toward a cheating partner, laments of heartache and divorce, songs that long for reconciliation.
Love songs are everywhere, and as Christians, we shouldnât be surprised. After all, the first recorded words of the first human being, Adam, were a love song.
When God saw that it was not good for Adam to be alone (Gen. 2:18), He made Eve as his helper and complement. And when Adam saw his match for the first time, he burst into song: âThis one, at last, is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh; this one will be called âwoman,â for she was taken from manâ (Gen. 2:23). Adam was delighted with the woman God had made. One can almost hear Etta Jamesâs voice filling the airwaves of the sky: âAt last! My love has come along!â
Genesis 2:23 gives us the forerunner to all the other love songs of the world. You know the typeâthe never-ending supply of songs that focus on how suitable the lover is for the singer. âYou were meant for me,â sang Jewel, âand I was meant for you.â Thereâs rich, biblical theology below all this singing about love.
Love and Marriage
Many of the worldâs love songs go right from romance to sex (or in other, even more problematic cases, from sex to eventual romance). But the first love song recorded in the Bible is different. The biblical text moves from Adamâs burst of melodic delight into the truth about marriage: âThis is why a man leaves his father and mother and bonds with his wife, and they become one fleshâ (Gen. 2:24).
Here is a relationship that includes sexuality, yes, but this union extends to all aspects of the coupleâs identity. The sexual partnership is the act that unites their bodies, but also intends to express and reestablish the covenant commitment that brings together the spiritual and emotional aspects of a man and woman into harmony. Whatâs his is hers; whatâs hers is his. Out of the family of father, mother, and child, comes another family.
And so, Adamâs delight at seeing his perfect complement is reenacted every time a man sees the first glimpse of his bride walking down the aisle and knows deep down inside, âThis is perfect.â All of those love songs that express in one way or another the truth that âwe were made for each otherâ are mere signposts pointing toward the cosmic reality of marriage, where the two halves of humanity are joined together in glorious and mysterious bliss.
Naked and Unashamed
Genesis 2 ends on an interesting note. âBoth the man and his wife were naked, yet felt no shameâ (Gen. 2:25). In the garden of Eden, no clothes were necessary. There was nothing to hide, nothing to be embarrassed about. Because there was no sin, there was no vulnerability, and no awkwardness. The first husband and wife lived together in the garden, at peace with each other, and in the light of their Creator, without even a hint of shame and embarrassment. They were blissful in their love and devotion, perfect in their union.
Naked and unashamed. Itâs important that we pause here for a moment and realize that the naked human body is not, in and of itself, a bad thing. Because we live in a fallen world where our lusts are easily aroused and our tendency to objectify others is so strong, it is easy for Christians to begin to think of nakedness as inherently evil. This overreaction can lead to theological problems, such as thinking of the human body itself as something sinful or bad.
Some of the earliest Christians struggled with their views of the body and of sexuality. The challenges to Christianity they encounteredâfrom the Gnostics, in particularâdenied the goodness of the body and led some believers to think that abstaining from marriage and sex was a higher and more noble calling than the more ordinary task of bearing fruit and having children.
We see no such hesitation in Genesis 2. Here, God gives Adam and Eve to one another, places them in a delightful garden, and fills their calendar with great and noble tasksâthe first of which was to be fruitful and multiply, and thus fill the earth with more image-bearers of God. Adam and Eve were to come together, and in the overflow of their love for one another, bring forth new life. There was no shame because there was no sin.
In the garden, we see the first humans in perfect relationship with one another and with God. They loved and trusted each other, and they loved and trusted God. The text tells us they walked and talked with God in the cool of the day. No wonder Jesus would later say, âBlessed are the pure in heart, for they will see Godâ (Matt. 5:8). In the garden, there was no sin to cloud Adam and Eveâs vision of God, and no shame to cause them to hide their bodies from each other.
Pure in heart. Naked and unashamed. Fruitful bliss. This is Godâs original design for humanity, a world where the peace of God flourishes and extends into new life and new tasks, and where sexuality finds its proper place in the unashamed love of a man and his wife.
Forbidden Delight and Desire
Adam saw his naked wife and was delighted. But the next time we see something described as âdelightful,â and the next time we see a human desiring something, is when the serpent enters the garden to tempt Eve to eat from the forbidden tree. âThe woman saw that the tree was good for food and delightful to look at, and that it was desirable for obtaining wisdomâ (Gen. 3:6).
First, Eve saw that it was good. Nothing in the text indicates that she was wrong. It was a tree that God made. Of course, it was good. Even though it was forbidden to her, still the fruit was good. But n...