Transformational Groups

Creating a New Scorecard for Groups

Ed Stetzer, Eric Geiger

• Publisher: B&H Books
• Year: 2014
• ISBN:
  9781433683329
• Topic: Theologie & Religion
• Subtopic: Christlicher Dienst

God declared through the Apostle Paul that the church would be a place of transformation. In 2 Corinthians 5: 17 we find, Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away, and look, new things have come. Despite this, the church seems increasingly to be a place where transformation fails to occur. Surveying the landscape, however, there are some bright spots where churches are faithfully producing transformed disciples. Furthermore, as shown in Scripture and supported by new research, God designed such transformation to often happen in the context of smaller groups of people. But what characteristics are true of churches that are making transformed disciples through group-based ministry-whether small groups, missional communities, Sunday school, or some other expression of groups? In Transformational Groups, Ed Stetzer and Eric Geiger have created a new scorecard that will provide a map to transformational success for your church's groups ministry. Using data from the largest survey of pastors and laypersons ever done on the condition of groups in the church, they define a simple process to lead your groups from where they are to where God wants them to be.

1

Transformational Group Manifesto

LeaderSpeak

Sin demands to have a man by himself. It withdraws him from the community. The more isolated a person is, the more destructive will be the power of sin over him.

—Dietrich Bonhoeffer

First Step: Create an intentional group DNA.

Were you to ever venture just north of San Francisco into Muir Woods, an incredible forest of sequoia trees, you would no doubt be provoked to a sense of awe over the strength and endurance of the massive trees. Sequoias are sometimes referred to as the largest living things on earth, reaching almost 250 feet in the air and standing for as many as fifteen hundred years.

When you stand before their enormous trunks and beneath a canopy more than twenty stories above you, it’s hard not to feel tiny and envious at the same time. If you could have a conversation with one (not that either of us have attempted that), would you not want to ask, “How? How have you done it? How have you stood strong through all the storms of life, all the difficult situations? How have you not toppled?”

Their response may be surprising.

You would probably assume that deep roots would be the fundamental reason the sequoias around you could date back to a few decades from the collapse of the Roman Empire. That is not the case at all, however, as each tree’s roots grow only about four feet in the ground. While going deeper helps many trees remain upright, the sequoia you stand before like an ant has not overcome the difficulties of life because of its depth.

The answer doesn’t lie down below in the earth but all around the tree. If you looked around, you would notice that sequoia trees grow only in groves. While their roots go only about four feet deep into the ground, their roots intermingle with the other sequoias next to them. One tree has other trees surrounding it, supporting it and keeping it strong. Each tree stands strong through the centuries because each tree has an interdependent posture.

No sequoia grows alone.

The connection to our spiritual walk should be obvious—no believer is transformed alone. Just as the mighty sequoia would topple without a community of supporting trees, believers who seek transformation apart from a Christian community are vulnerable to spiritually topple in the winds of adversity.

In many circles, believers are reclaiming “personal spiritual disciplines” that help them encounter the grace of God. Moreover, the plethora of resources provided to Christians for “personal spiritual growth” is constantly on the rise, while simultaneously some church leaders are experimenting with “personal spiritual growth plans” for members, customized to the individual’s learning style and current assessment of his spiritual life.

While we are grateful for the encouragement, resources, and opportunities for individuals to grow, we fear that the beauty and necessity of community may be lost in the forest of resources for the individual. If community is ignored, the resources may fill minds while not transforming hearts.

How important is community for the body of Christ? Is it just a detail many people can live without? Is community an option when you dream about your church design? Or is community one of those annoying consumer needs you have to provide?

Transformation is a communal experience, not an individual exercise. Jesus, God on earth, understood this fact. His model of disciple making must be ours. Jesus chose twelve, a small group. The synergy that occurred in that group of twelve aided greatly in the process of making these men mature disciples. The conversations they engaged in, the times they served Rabbi Jesus together, the processing of Jesus’ teachings around a campfire, even the missteps these men shared were all in Jesus’ plan for making them into the mature disciples He needed them to be. Doing life together is an unquestionable essential in the disciple-making process.

When we speak of the value of community, we are not speaking of arguing about the right kind of small group. None of the “groups” discussion will matter until we all see this as a greater subject than groups. No matter how you define groups—Life Groups, Sunday school, discipleship classes, or Bible fellowships—the importance is the same. Church leaders—including pastoral staff, elders, deacons, and leadership teams—must see community as a biblical nonnegotiable, an essential for transformation, a necessity for building lives that stand the test of time.

This brings us to the Transformational Groups project.

Transformational Groups

As we looked across the church world, we recognized a discipleship deficit. In a previous research project, the Transformational Discipleship project, this was confirmed in profound ways. Through our research, personal experience, and understanding of Scripture, we also firmly believe that Christian maturity happens most effectively in smaller groups of people.

In light of this, we wondered if we could use research to determine exactly what core characteristics are present in each group that is effectively creating transformed disciples. Regardless of the form of your group, what are the necessary components that consistently rise to the surface as integral to the disciple-making process? Through all of this, we thought this research might be helpful to churches as they seek to be more effective at leading people to become fully transformed followers of Jesus.

Your church, no matter how together it looks on the surface, will never become all that God wants if community is just an annoying detail, just something else to place on the calendar. The pastor(s) and church leaders must believe deeply in and declare the importance of community to Sunday morning consumers who prefer comfort to community. Maybe we have spent too much time inviting people to groups and not enough time declaring truth and expecting group participation.

That seemed to be the case when we looked at the research. Immediately we noticed three disappointing findings that paint a sad picture of Christian community. It further bolstered in our mind the need to more boldly declare the necessity of community, of sequoia-tree Christianity.

Disappointment 1. Disorganized Discipleship

Our first disappointment was that over half of pastors surveyed said they have no visible strategy for their group life.

As an indication of that, we asked an additional question: Who is responsible for selecting the curriculum for small groups? Two-thirds of the pastors reported they let the group leaders decide. The “study what you want” approach is irresponsible unless there is clear training that equips group leaders for wise choices. Without that, the haphazard approach can be a bit terrifying. This greatly inhibits the church developing a consistent culture for how groups are going to function and mature over time. It works against a common direction and vision and creates a mismatched, helter-skelter kind of chaotic ethos within the church.

Imagine if pastors and church leaders put as much energy into their worship service as they do their group ministry. Just let Bob, the worship leader, pick whatever random song he likes. It could be one from a hymnal, a song he heard on the radio driving to church that morning, or a hit from when he was a teenager. The musicians and choir could follow his lead or go do their own thing. The ushers could stroll down the aisle to collect the offering whenever the urge struck. This type of environment would be chaos, off-putting to any guest that came through and distracting for a member trying to participate and worship God with other believers. In short, it would not be something most pastors and church leaders would allow for very long. Yet, according to the research, groups are often handled in this way.

Small groups should receive similar care and attention as the worship service. A church member may casually know the people they sit beside during the sermon, but if community is emphasized and practiced, they will intimately know and love the people beside them in their small group. But this does not happen overnight or without effort. Groups require constant attention to be transformational.

Everyone seems to be talking about having groups, and everyone seems to want them. But sometimes they get frustrating and messy because they involve placing sinners in close proximity to one another. When these problems arise, even though they should be expected, there is a drag on the group conversation. Churches come to realize groups can be hard to manage and hard to start, so they can give up too quickly. They think they’ve tried groups, but they haven’t given them time. Then another book comes out promising great results, and the pastor jumps to something different, as if it will be the answer to every small-group problem. Remember: there is never a one-time, final group solution for everything. There is, however, a constant cycle of learning, trying, and changing. Transformation takes time, patience, endurance, organization, and unified direction.

Concluding and sticking to a group strategy that is right for your church and culture for a significant period of time is the only way an effective, transformational group ministry can be established. We have a friend who serves as the groups pastor for a large church in the central United States. Over the last four years he has been asked by the senior pastor he serves alongside to revisit the church’s group strategy at least four times. Each time my friend has researched the new ideology, trained leaders in the new way of doing groups, and then begun the hard work of implementing the new principles and practices into all of the church’s groups. Many of his group leaders have bailed, and most of those who are left are discouraged. Group members who were once excited about being in a group are no longer in a group or are reconsidering being in a group, and some people have left the church.

In order to overcome disappointment, it is essential that church leaders conclude what is the best strategy for doing groups in their context and wholeheartedly embrace that ideology with its principles and practices.

We hope that, before you finish this book, you will have realized the essentials to healthy group life and are well on your way to concluding a groups model that embraces those essentials and is effective in your setting.

Disappointment 2. Comfort and Not Correction

Our second disappointment was that group attenders were primarily looking for comfort from groups more than accountability and correction.

Realistically none of us are going to say we love the accountability part. Neither do we look forward to being corrected through the study of God’s Word and the “caring concern” of our brothers or sisters in Christ. But we know the reality of being a Christ follower. We grow best when, in community, we experience both biblical correction and accountability.

People who do not attend groups consider life change in others and correction as the two LEAST important outcomes of a group. Another discovery is that people who are currently not attending groups would prefer a group that meets at the church for only an hour. Obviously they are not interested in making any significant commitment to community. Of these who are NOT attending, 71 percent say they are open to attending, and another 8 percent say they are actively looking for a group.

The gap is quite compelling between what is experienced or wanted and what might actually be needed. Among those who attend a group, the top two outcomes they want are Encouragement and Acceptance. The two outcomes they least desire were Accountability and Correction. Compare that with nonattenders. Their top two desired outcomes are Encouragement and Support, and their two least desired outcomes were Life-Change in Others and Correction.

People may see these numbers and come to varying conclusions, but to us they indicate a discipleship deficit. Even those committed to group attendance don’t seem to be experiencing a high level of accountability and correction. The purpose of accountability in community is to lead others to repentance in everyday life through biblical correction with grace, knowing that every sin is unbelief in the gospel. Group DNA should include a culture of accountability and practice biblical correction.

Spiritual growth begins with discomfort. When God’s Word points out a seemingly outlandish expectation, this creates internal discomfort. When the Holy Spirit whispers a seemingly unreasonable expectation, discomfort is the outcome. The idea that spiritual growth begins with discomfort is a fact many church members and church leaders have been unwilling or unable to embrace. In fact, because we often find ourselves in the mode of longing to grow a church numerically rather than growing individuals in the church spiritually, we will be tempted to downplay the biblical expectations of a disciple so that attenders will be comfortable and choose to become church members. If we’re going to work in tandem with Jesus in the disciple-making process, we must be willing to allow His standard to be the standard for each of His disciples, and we must hold one another accountable to live out those standards in a safe, healthy, committed group...