Chapter 1
940–1204 The Devil’s Brood
A howling gale tore through the streets of Newark on the evening of 18 October 1216. A mid-sized market town located some forty miles inland from the North Sea, it was rare for a storm to give rise to the levels of concern often felt by citizens of its coastal counterparts. Lying on both the Great North Road and the Fosse Way, the area was popular with travellers, especially cloth and wool merchants in town to sell their wares. The early twelfth-century bridge over the Trent had improved the trade links further, and by the reign of Henry II, the market had become well established. Though most of the buildings were of timber construction, even at the height of winter weather damage was often repairable.
This was not the first time the town had been forced to endure such a tempest.
Behind the sturdy stone walls of the nearby Norman castle, the abbot of Croxton had far more troubling issues to address. The south riverside fortress, though by no means immune to regular splashback, was far better prepared for nature’s challenges than the earlier motte-and-bailey that had preceded it. The same lack of worry, however, could not be said of the crisis that had brought him there. Renowned for his medical expertise, it didn’t take him long to realise that the patient he had been asked to treat was beyond hope of recovery. Rather than prolong the inevitable, he heard the dying man’s confession and performed the last rites. The storm was over by sunrise.
Blighted by a combination of chronic fatigue, dysentery brought about from years of poor diet and a sudden fever, King John passed away in the early hours of 19 October after more than seventeen years on the throne. His final year had been a black one for England. Accusations of betrayal against his own family and an inability to keep his allies on side had contributed in no small part to humiliating defeat on the Continent. By 1214, the loss of much of his ancestral birthright had been compounded by domestic discord. Loathed in equal measure by natural adversary and should-be follower, John’s life ended ignominiously amid a strange alliance of foreign invader and baronial rebel. Somewhat surprisingly perhaps, it ended through natural causes.1
If John’s fall from grace was not extraordinary in itself, his path to the throne was every bit so. The fifth and youngest son of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine, John’s chances of wearing the crown had been slim. Having lived through the deaths of two of his older brothers, Henry the Young King and Geoffrey, Duke of Brittany, the former of whom had ruled briefly as joint king alongside his father before his ill-advised uprising preceded his premature downfall, on the older king’s death the throne passed to his one surviving brother, Richard.
Famed in both history and literary romance for inheriting his father’s fortitude, less so his restraint, the Lionheart subsequently ruled for ten years over an England he rarely saw as he concentrated instead on his life mission of bringing about a Christian Holy Land. In his absence, the inevitable cracks in government began to appear, and a kingdom that included Ireland, the duchies of Normandy and Aquitaine and the counties of Poitou and Anjou slowly began to fragment. While the ‘Angevin’ empire’s erosion may have been reversible under a prolonged Ricardian kingship, a chance hit by a crossbow bolt in the neck as he inspected his troops at the siege of Chalus-Chabrol doomed him to an early death. Minus a legitimate heir, the dying king was left little choice than to offer his blessing to the brother who had connived to usurp him. With this, John, the last standing of Henry and Eleanor’s infamous brood, was proclaimed heir to the throne of England and ruler of all of his father’s territories.2
How the rulers of England had come to acquire such vast swathes of land is itself a story that has often been retold. Indicative of the name, the Angevin Empire had its ruling dynasty in Anjou, the so-called Garden of France whose regions included the Loire Valley and its capital at Angers. The lucky – or unlucky – beneficiary of this had been Henry II himself.3 Son of the empress Matilda, daughter of Henry I, Henry was, on his father’s side, also descended of the original counts of Anjou, who had dominated the county since the tenth century. In the eyes of Henry’s contemporaries, this was of no little significance. Back in the reign of Edward the Confessor, the future saint prophecised that the green tree of England would once again flourish when the split parts of the trunk were rejoined, something that Henry’s accession appeared to satisfy. As the grandson of Matilda of Scotland, the first wife of Henry I and ipso facto descended of the Saxon kings, Henry was the first descendant of Alfred the Great to occupy the throne of England since the Norman Conquest. Ever mindful of this, Henry made sure to promote the idea, a fact that helped ensure Edward’s canonisation and translation to Westminster Abbey in 1163.4
It was the success of these original counts as previously unknown castellans that helped pave the way for such remarkable wealth. Renowned for the typical characteristics possessed of a leader, namely intellect, prowess in battle and devotion to the church, a far rarer knack for warcraft, diplomacy and a string of carefully arranged marriages had brought almost unprecedented success in France that even in Henry’s own time remained a highly fragmented kingdom.5
Of the origins of the house, there are many stories. From the mists of obscurity, the first to rise is Ingelgar: a somewhat legendary soldier of fortune who made his name fighting his way through the Loire Valley. Building on these early victories was his son, Fulk the Red, who in 941 became count of Anjou: a title that in the tenth century came close to rivalling that of king of France. Over the coming 180 years, further successes gave rise to more fanciful legend. Preceding the antics of the influential eleventh-century warlord and later pilgrim, Fulk Nerra, who apparently achieved victory over the count of Brittany by preventing his army’s retreat with the creation of a ‘gale sweeping corn’, few tales compare with that of Geoffrey Greygown (Count of Anjou 960–987), who reputedly single-handedly slew a giant.6
By 1128, the rule of the giant slayer’s descendants reached new heights when the respected Fulk V was chosen to replace the childless Baldwin II as king of Jerusalem. In Fulk’s absence, the rule of his son Geoffrey the Fair as count of Anjou saw the Garden of France flourish. It was Geoffrey who laid the foundations for future prosperity by conquering Normandy and laying claim to the throne of England through his impressive wife Matilda – the same Matilda who was a daughter of Henry I and Matilda of Scotland. Though Geoffrey would never wear the crown of England, partly due to Matilda’s hatred of him, the honour would soon be bestowed upon their son, named in honour of his grandfather and crowned, Henry II.7
Both on the surface and beneath it, Henry had much in common with the original counts, especially his father. Handsome and tall, both father and son were strong of mind and body. Labelled ‘the little fox’ by his enemies, apparently in honour of both his red hair and a passage in the Song of Solomon, Henry inherited not only his father’s determination but also an occasional wrathful streak. Of the latter, the little fox appears to have been particularly proud. In conversation with his court confessor, Henry is alleged to have remarked, ‘And why not, when God himself is capable of such anger?’ Charming and affable when the mood suited, both men were well educated in the arts of warcraft and politics. Shrewd administrators, they shared their ancestors’ spirit of adventure and were often generous to the poor. As time would tell, Henry would also follow his father’s example of being extra careful when it came to choosing a wife, accepting a woman a decade older than himself with a significant dower. It is equally vital that Henry bore his father’s surname ‘Plantagenet’, sprung from Geoffrey’s wearing a sprig of a broom in his hat.8
By 1144, Geoffrey’s conquest of Normandy had almost been completed, ending nine years of conflict in the hope of cementing Matilda’s claim to both there and England. As the daughter of Henry I, Matilda’s claim was unbroken to William the Conqueror, who had been invested with the dukedom back in 1035. On Henry I’s death in 1135, a number of the barons reneged on their oaths to Matilda and declared Stephen king on his arrival in England. For Geoffrey and Matilda, news of Stephen’s rushed accession placed them on a path to war with the new king in both England and Normandy. Further to Angevin control of western England, Geoffrey’s investiture as duke of Normandy as well as inheriting Anjou ensured approximately half the future Anglo-Norman dominions were already safely under his rule. When a bloodthirsty Henry faced Stephen at Wallingford in 1153, the pressure was on for the latter to submit. The following year, Henry’s time finally came. Thus ended the nineteen-year-winter and began a dynasty that would be fraught with both intrigue and turmoil.9
As history would later recall, under Henry II’s rule the ever-developing empire would reach its zenith. As a consequence of his marriage to Eleanor of Aquitaine in 1152, new dominions were added to the originals, most significantly the region after which she was named. Despite the plethora of biographies of Eleanor written over the centuries, what is known of her as a person is disappointingly limited and plagued by legend.10 Annulment of her marriage to Louis VII of France had been a contentious issue. Fifteen years together had delivered two daughters. In her earlier years, she had gained notable sway over the French king and was derided as a bad influence by future saint and leader of the Cistercian order, Bernard of Clairvaux. Evidence suggests that on her divorce from Louis, she set her sights on Henry early. His own set on her duchy, Henry was only too pleased to oblige, and their marriage followed two months later. The fact that Henry later imprisoned her for sixteen years is undoubtedly a testament to her capabilities and the threat she possessed, not least in terms of her intellect and influence over her children.11
From the early efforts of the self-made Ingelgar to Geoffrey of Anjou’s conquest of Normandy, this unique combination of skills and circumstances had gained Henry an empire that stretched from the borders of Scotland in the north to the Pyrenees in the south. Never before in the history of England or France had the people known one overlord. In the eyes of the contemporary chronicler, such power could only have been born of sinister origins. If the musings of Gerald of Wales were to be believed, Plantagenet success had come as the unholy consequence of one of the early counts being seduced into marriage by the daughter of the devil, who later flew screaming out of a window on being forced to endure Holy Communion. In later times, Richard I took great satisfaction in such tales, stating: ‘What wonder if we lack the natural affections of mankind – we come from the Devil, and must needs go back to the Devil.’ Such legends would also leave their mark outside of the king’s court. In the same chronicle, Gerard of Wales paid similar testament, taking inspiration from another Bernard of Clairvaux quote: ‘From the Devil they came and to the Devil they will return.’12
Undoubtedly one of England’s most competent monarchs, ruling over such dominions caused several problems, not least concerning his children’s inheritance. On paper, the situation seemed simple. Come 1170, Henry had four living sons, his first-born son, William, IX Count of Poitiers, having died in 1156 at the age of 3. Consistent with the usual customs, his eldest surviving son, Prince Henry, would become king of England, duke of Normandy and count of Anjou – the three most important lands – with Eleanor’s Aquitaine being granted to Richard. Geoffrey, the third child, would rule Brittany as Henry the Young’s vassal, leaving John, the youngest of the bunch, lacking land. In a bid to appease his youngest son, Henry allocated him Chinon, Loudun and Mirebeau, a move that contributed in no small part to the younger Henry’s rebellion of 1173–74.13
Such violent acts of rebellion by his own sons would have a profound effect on the mental health of the old king. It was recounted, again by Gerard of Wales, that one panel in his magnificent painted chamber in Winchester Castle had been kept deliberately blank before a painting was commissioned in his later years. True to the king’s design, the image presented a fine eagle and its four young eaglets, one seated on the father’s back while two tore at the flesh of its wings. All the while, the youngest sat patiently on the eagle’s head. Viewed together, the scene represented a portentous thought in the king’s increasingly paranoid mind that none of his sons could be trusted. Worse still, that his favourite would cause him the most pain.14
Henry’s fears would soon become real, but not until after the heir to the throne, Henry the Young, lost his life to dysentery in 1183. On the king’s death in 1189, the mantle fell upon Richard, who had also waged war against his father. Like Henry the Young, Richard had much of his father in him. A talented warrior and administrator in his own right, Henry had been reluctant to go to war for war’s sake. Whereas both Henrys had died with their crusader vows unfulfilled, during Richard’s reign the opposite would be true. For this, the empire suffered. The lands Henry had managed so carefully for more than three decades were, in the reign of his son, often seen as little more than a cash cow. Indeed, Richard famously claimed he would sell London if he could find a buyer.15
For the first time since the Norman Conquest, conflict with France would become a recurring theme. Richard’s refusal to honour his long-time betrothal to the king of France’s sister Alice reignited tensions on the Continent, which were compounded by his failure to father an heir with his chosen bride, Berengaria of Navarre. When Richard died, his reputation as a great warrior and crusader was already cemented. His failures were primarily limited to the Holy Land, his inability to recapture Jerusalem the major disappointment. At the time of John’s accession, the Angevin Empire was still intact; thanks to Richard’s charismatic personality and good relations with the Norman and Angevin nobles, loyalty to the Lionheart was far less in question than it had been in England. While Richard’s absence can explain much of this, the ever-deepening entrenchment of Norman rule and interbreeding between Angle, Saxon, Jute and Norman alike would inevitably ensure that the different clusters of long-time native and the pre- and post-1066 settlers became gradually lost. Just as the term Norman had grown from Norsemen – Vikings who became Gallicised – by Henry II’s reign Norman English had already given way to a softer Anglo-Norman. As time would tell, the ensuing schism would prove irreversible.
Replacing a king who had been absent for all but seven months of the last decade inevitably presented a unique set of challenges. Unfortunately for John, these would be compounded by new problems that tended to be self-inflicted. Spoiled by his father and intimidated by his mother and elder siblings, John’s reputation as the runt of the litter was already well established. On Richard’s dea...