Carbon Allotropes as Top Materials
Mário Calvete Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
Carbon is the basic element of organic materials. Depending on how the carbon atoms are bonded, carbon-based systems can be divided into groups with different physical and chemical properties. As both the widely diamond and graphite carbon allotropes are of natural sources, the main interest here discussed will be regarding the other main existing forms of carbon arising from laboratory practice, which are the fullerenes, carbon nanotubes and graphene. Herein is presented a conspectus on the field of the above mentioned synthetic carbon allotropes, where emphasis is set on their preparation and functionalization methods, along with more detailed examples on several promising applications with 770 references provided. Some synthetic details on the preparation of state-of-the-art compounds are given as well.
Keywords: Capacitors, Carbon allotropes, Carbon nanotubes, Fullerenes, Functionalization of carbon nanotubes, Functionalization of fullerenes, Functionalization of graphene, Graphene, Graphene oxide, Guel cells, Sensors, Solar cells.
INTRODUCTION
Carbon is the basic element of organic materials. The great interest in carbon materials fundamentally originates from a variety of chemical bonding styles, which has never been seen in other elements [1, 2]. Each carbon atom possesses six electrons occupying 1s2, 2s2, and 2p2 atomic orbitals. As a result, a carbon atom may assume three different bonding configurations, sp, sp2, and sp3 [3]. Depending on how the carbon atoms are bonded, carbon-based systems can be divided into groups with different physical and chemical properties.
The specific carbon hybridization and its binding to surrounding atoms determine the type of allotrope assumed. sp3 hybridized carbon possesses tetrahedral lattice (diamond), while sp2 hybridized carbon may produce buckminsterfullerene, carbon nanotubes or graphite, depending on the conditions in which it is formed. Graphite and diamond are known since primeval times, but it was only in the nineteenth century that the structural difference between diamond and graphite was clarified [4], while buckminsterfullerene and carbon nanotubes have only been discovered within the last twenty years, and are just beginning to be understood. Although the theoretical calculations about graphene properties existed for many decades and graphite thin film has been grown by all types of methods over decades, interest in this material was ignited by two independent reports, published in 2004. de Heer [5] demonstrated that ultrathin epitaxial graphite films grown on SiC with 2D electron gas behavior could be patterned via conventional lithographic techniques.
Each of the graphitic materials possesses different dimensionality (Fig 1). The two-dimensional graphene can be considered as the "mother" of all other dimensionalities, i.e . fullerenes (0-dimension), carbon nanotubes (1-dimension) and graphite (3-dimensions) [6].
Fig. (1)) (a) graphene;
(b) graphite;
(c) carbon nanotube;
(d) fullerene.
As both diamond and graphite carbon allotropes are of natural sources, the main interest here discussed will be regarding the other main existing forms of carbon, which arise from laboratory practice, fullerenes, carbon nanotubes and graphene.
Buckminsterfullerene, C60, was named after Buckminster Fuller, inventor of the geodesic dome), was discovered by Smalley, Kroto and Curl in 1985 [7], being awarded with the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1996 for those discoveries [8]. However, C60 has a pre-history. In 1970 Osawa, a Japanese chemist reported about a molecule that would be consisted of 60 carbon atoms [9]. It would be, he guessed, a spherical, stable molecule with soccer ball shape, later discussing its probable theoretical aromatic properties in more detail [10]. Also in theory, Gal’pern and Bochvar published a study in 1973 bringing up these structures [11].
About a decade later, Orville L. Chapman initiated its intents to synthesize C60 [12]. While Chapman and his colleagues were working on attempted syntheses of C60, Smalley and his group were busy with a completely distinct subject, the study of atomic clusters. They used a self-made device in which laser energy was used for vaporization of an element sample, having no interest in carbon until a visitor, Kroto, suggested the use of their device to direct light on some carbon clusters detected by Smalley. When performing the experiment, the researchers observed an atypical concentration of carbon clusters, spontaneously self-assembled from hot nucleating carbon plasma [7].
After this acclaimed disclosure, the unambiguous proof of the soccer ball structure still remained opened. Several ...