SECTION ONE
INTRODUCING THE LAUSANNE MOVEMENT
THE LAUSANNE STORY: A PERSONAL PRELUDE
Knud Jørgensen
In 1974 I attended Lausanne as a young journalist. In 2010 I attended Cape Town as a senior statesman. The decades between these two events contain the life of an âevangelical ecumenicalâ. I was sent to the Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization in 1974 by one of the major Geneva-based ecumenical organizations to report on events and themes for Radio Voice of the Gospel in Ethiopia. At the end of Lausanne 1974 I signed the Lausanne Covenant â and returned to Geneva and Ethiopia.
The word âevangelizationâ was new to me; it had an American tone and smelled of effectiveness. I knew what âevangelismâ was from my days within Christian youth work and the Intervarsity movement in Denmark. But âevangelizationâ meant more than witnessing to a neighbour. It had to do with âunreachedâ people groups, church growth theory, the need for sodalities (go-structures) and not just modalities (come-structures). And there was a professor (Ralph Winter) from Fuller Theological Seminary who talked about various types of evangelism: E-1, E-2, and E-3. I understood that I probably was an E-3 evangelist in my radio ministry in Africa.
My job at Lausanne 74 was to make radio programmes. So I pulled key people into my small home-made studio: Billy Graham, John Stott, Peter Beyerhaus, Samuel Escobar, RenĂŠ Padilla, Ralph Winter, etc. I did not know that they were âfamousâ. I asked questions, listened â and sensed that what they said echoed the tones of revival and radical discipleship of my Intervarsity days.
âRadical discipleshipâ was something I had learned from reading Dietrich Bonhoefferâs The Cost of Discipleship.1 At Lausanne I heard the same tone, first in the desire to bind together evangelism and socio-political involvement, as expressed in the Lausanne Covenant, but even more in the insistent call from the Latin Americans to ârepudiate as demonic the attempt to drive a wedge between evangelism and social actionâ.2 I came from a church3 in Ethiopia whose guiding light was âServing the Whole Human Beingâ, so I was in tune with what they said, that there is no dichotomy in the Bible between the Word spoken and the Word made visible in the lives of Godâs people. I understood that there was a tension here between the âevangelizationâ people and the âholisticâ people. I sided with those who said that those who proclaim the Cross must be marked by the Cross.
While studying at Fuller Theological Seminary shortly after Lausanne 1974, I felt rather alone with my holistic view. Church growth, Ă la Fuller professor Donald McGavran,4 the name of the game, and his focus was âredemption and social liftâ: disciple people and then the Spirit will change their lives and they will be change-makers in society. I was therefore relieved when the very first Lausanne Occasional Paper (LOP) dealt with the âhomogeneous unit principleâ,5 and when one of the most important subsequent LOPs was a report from the consultation in Grand Rapids about Evangelism and Social Responsibility,6 both of them were edited by âUncle Johnâ (John Stott). I taught regularly at his London Institute for Contemporary Christianity and was therefore included in his extended âfamilyâ.
On my bookshelves I have found 25 books and booklets directly related to Lausanne. A fair number are the LOPs which have followed me and inspired me throughout my life â and which I would love to see revived. Here was a format easily accessible and requiring clarity in form. Among the books are three volumes that grew out of consultations and study processes of which I had the privilege of being part. The first volume is a book on God the Evangelist7 which grew out of a consultation on the âWork of the Holy Spirit and Evangelizationâ held in Oslo in May 1985. The co-ordinator was my close friend, Dr Tormod Engelsviken. The purpose of the consultation was to take the Holy Spirit seriously in connection with evangelism. All of us had prepared solid and learned papers on the topic; my paper was on âThe Use of Electronic Media in Evangelizationâ. As we discussed and deliberated on these papers, we realised on the second-to-last day that we were stuck. We simply did not know how to proceed. Here was a group of top missiologists and evangelical leaders from around the globe, including John Wimber from the Vineyard movement in California, and we did not know where to go. Then someone suggested that perhaps we should wait for the Holy Spirit; for a whole hour we sat still, praying and letting the Spirit talk. To me that was the most memorable part of the consultation. The Holy Spirit was present in a strong and quiet manner, and rather than pass a number of resolutions (which Bruce Nichols from the World Evangelical Fellowship and I actually had worked the whole night to formulate!), we agreed to hand over our papers and the input of our discussions to David Wells who then pulled all of it together in his book on God the Evangelist.
The second book to which I contributed was on Faith and Modernity.8 Also at that time (in 1993) I wrote on media (âModernity, information technology and Christian faithâ). It was Os Guinness that had inspired us to hold a consultation in Uppsala on Faith and Modernity. He had given a paper in Manila in 1989 on the same topic â a paper which provoked great interest and which was so well delivered that all of us got up and applauded. The Uppsala consultation did not get under my skin as the Oslo event (1985), but it represented an honest and biblically based attempt to set up signposts for our encounter with modernity and post-modernity. We struggled, we sweated, and we discussed and listened to one another â Lesslie Newbigin, David Wells, Harold Netland, Vinay Samuel and Os Guinness. I was 43 years of age but felt like a teenager in this solemn company. What impressed me then and now is how Lausanne people have been concerned not only for unreached people, but also for searching for inroads for the Gospel into contemporary society in the Global North. The role this search played in Cape Town in 2010 is a good illustration (where Os Guinness once again played a key role).
The third book is about âan uneasy frontier in Christian missionâ as we called it. My field of study had by then shifted from information society to missiology. Within missiology at that time a major controversy had erupted around the concept âspiritual warfareâ. I was then chair of the Lausanne Theology Working Group, and we decided to bring together a group of key players in August 2000 outside Nairobi. âWeâ included Scott Moreau, Tormod Engelsviken, Tokunboh Adeyemo, Birger Nygaard and me. We agreed to replace the word âwarfareâ with âconflictâ (to take the military hot air out of the balloon), and we managed to put together a statement on âDeliver Us From Evilâ. As a moderator, I have seldom felt so âsuccessfulâ in terms of having achieved something essential for the understanding of the Gospel and the understanding of the adversary Satan and his forces. This echoed Lutherâs hymn, âA mighty fortress is our Godâ, and my own experiences in Ethiopia and the East African Revival: âYou must live in the light so that the devil doesnât catch you in the dark,â the African leaders had taught me. A key text is Col 2:13ff about how Christ cancelled my record of debts on his Cross and freed me from the power of the spiritual rulers and authorities: âHe made a public spectacle of them by leading them as captives in his victory procession.â Hallelujah! This tone can still make me weep and laugh at one and the same time. In Danish and Norwegian we have a hymn about this: âGodâs Son has set me free from Satanâs tyranny.â The outcome of the consultation was an LOP written by Tormod Engelsviken9 and a book edited primarily by Scott Moreau about Deliver Us From Evil10 â a book which reflects a meeting of sisters and brothers where we managed to talk together about a most controversial topic at that time. My own paper was on âSpiritual Conflict in the Socio-Political Contextâ â a topic which brought together my African experiences and spiritual conflict in political and economic arenas. It was at this consultation I came to know Hwa Yung from Malaysia who since then has been a good friend. Also my doctoral mentor Charles H. Kraft from Fuller and his wife Marguerite were there with their warmth and wise input.
The modernity and the spiritual conflict consultations took place after the second Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization in Manila in 1989. My role in Manila was information and communication. Prior to Manila I had for a couple of years been part of the Communication Working Group headed by Warwick Olson. At the last hour before the congress, the group had to become operational and take over the running of the information service.11 My job became to lead some of the press conferences. One of them featured a man I had met already in Oslo in 1985, John Wimber. âSigns and Wondersâ was his trademark. Having lived in Ethiopia and encountered the stark reality of evil spirits, I was open for what Wimber had to share. Already in Oslo in 1985 he had talked about âdemonizing powers over Osloâ â strong words for a non-charismatic Lutheran. But prior to 1989 in Manila I had experienced renewal through meeting with the charismatic movement Oase in Norway, and had become personally acquainted with Wimber. In Manila the focus on signs and wonders â and on Pentecostalism â was highly controversial, and therefore the press conference became quite âexcitedâ. But in the Manila Manifesto it was clearly affirmed âthat spiritual warfare demands spiritual weapons, and that we must both preach the words in the power of the Spirit, and pray constantly that we may enter into Christâs victory over the principalities and powers of evilâ.12
Manila inspired me deeply with its clarion call: âProclaim Christ until He Comesâ. Here was the focus that since then has become the watchword for the Movement: âCalling the Whole Church to Take the Whole Gospel to the Whole Worldâ.13 While in Manila, the Communication Working Group, of which I was a member, there and then brought to completion a book on the last day of the congress with the title The Whole Gospel for the Whole World.14 The editor was Australian Alan Nichols who managed to get all of us to write and give input. How exciting and exhausting to write a book while the congress was still in session. The congress also gave birth to a small book in Danish which I have cherished and often used when telling about Manila.15 If we want to make Lausanne appeal to people at the grass roots, we need such popular books in different languages.
Upon my return from Manila, I wondered how to put into action and find expression for my deep-felt inspiration. The result was a list of topics and headlines which I shared with my friend Ole Christian Kvarme, then General Secretary of the Norwegian Bible Society and today Bishop of the Church of Norway in Oslo. âWhy donât we write a book?â I asked Ole Christian. He suggested that I join hands with two missi...