Introduction
Whether inspired by a desire to justify an occupationās status as a profession (teaching and social work, for example) or by the need to re-assert precisely what lies at the heart of a long-standing profession in the wake of public concerns about standards (medicine and law, for example), the related questions of what constitutes a profession and what constitutes professional practice have received a great deal of attention over recent years. A core concern within this literature on the professions has been to highlight and seek to understand the ethical basis of professions, whether generally or specifically. Professions are deemed inherently ethical occupations because, and more so than other occupations, they place high moral demands on the conduct of workers. Indeed, these ethical and moral demands ā which include care, integrity, fairness and diligence ā are often viewed as the defining feature of many professions, including medicine, law and teaching, reminding us that professions are ultimately concerned with human actions and interactions. For example, in relation to medicine, the focus of this present book, Bontemps-Hommen et al. (2019) have suggested that morality is at the heart of medicine. As Oakley and Cocking (2001) also remind us, the focus of professional work is typically the provision of goods ā such as health, education and justice ā that are fundamental to flourishing individuals and societies. In specific relation to medical education, Brody and Doukas (2014) talk of medicine as both a ātrust-generating professionā and as āthe application of virtue to practiceā (see also Rhodes (2020) on the importance of trust). Yet, and as various professional āscandalsā over the last 20 years have evidenced, every profession and professional faces ethical challenges and dilemmas as part of their work. Indeed, the very ethical nature of the professions entails that public mistrust and criticism results when conduct falls below the standards expected (Blond et al., 2015).
In order to examine the ethical nature of professions and the ethical dilemmas experienced by professionals, since its inception the Jubilee Centre has undertaken a number of empirical studies examining character, virtues and the professions. Some of these studies have concentrated on the professions generally (Arthur et al., 2019a), while others have focused in on specific professions: law (Arthur et al., 2014), medical practice (Arthur et al., 2015a), education (Arthur et al., 2015b), business (KristjƔnsson et al., 2017a), nursing (KristjƔnsson et al., 2017b), and the British Army (Arthur et al., 2018). More recently, through the project Practical Wisdom and Professional Practice: Integration and Intervention the Centre has built on this research to examine particular commonalities and differences across professions and professionals (Arthur et al., 2019a).
The purpose of this first chapter is to provide an initial survey of the existing literature on the professions. The first section considers briefly what constitutes a profession in general terms, before turning to the more specific ethical dimensions of professional activity. It does so in light of the now widespread trend towards managerialism, accountability and efficiency that has been witnessed across professions in a number of countries over the last 30 years (Berwick, 2016; Montori, 2017). In the second section, attention moves to consider the value of a virtue-based account of professional ethics. In this section we draw on the Jubilee Centreās neo-Aristotelian approach to virtues and character in order to argue that professional ethics involves but also transcends reliance on rules and duties, thereby requiring professionals to act with professional wisdom and judgement.
What constitutes a profession?
While definitions of what constitutes a profession abound, certain features seem to be generally, if not universally, accepted (see, for example, Carr, 1999). These are that:
- a profession is a paid occupation;
- a profession requires formal qualifications, a high level of education and a prolonged period of training/induction;
- a professional possesses high level theoretical and practical expertise in a given discipline;
- a profession provides a public service;
- a profession is, and professionals are, held in high esteem within society;
- a professional acts with integrity, care, honesty and trust, exhibiting a level of professional autonomy and judgement;
- professional ethics is guided by a code of conduct specific to that profession.
The Australian Council of Professions,1 which captures each of the features above, defines a āProfessionā as:
In seeking to establish a āworking definition for medical educatorsā, Cruess, Johnstone and Cruess (2004: 75) offer the following:
In the UK, various professions make clear the centrality of the āethicalā to the nature of the profession. For example, in its Code of Ethics,2 the British Association of Social Workers asserts that:
The Law Society of England and Wales3 makes clear that:
Many more codes of conduct from other professions that similarly locate ethical conduct as fundamental to the profession could be cited. However, despite these reasonably well established and understood definitions, how best the ethical should be formulated conceptually and can be implemented practically, remains both disputed and challenging. Turning specifically to definitions of professionalism in relation to medical practice (which are examined in more detail in Chapter 2), Ong et al. (2020: 636) reflect both that rather than being static, āprofessionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed, multidimensional constructā and that āthe concept of professionalism remains poorly definedā.
Clearly, ideas about what constitutes the āgoodā professional transcend simply technical abilities and encompass notions of judgement, wisdom and care. However, further questions remain about the extent to which particular cultures, discourses and practices can put pressure on how professionals, particularly those working in the public sector, can act with (or indeed without) ethics and integrity (see, for example, Furlong et al., 2017). Indeed, various studies evidence the impact (whether positive or negative) of workplace conditions on professionalsā ability to exhibit ethical conduct (see, for example, Oakley and Cocking, 2001; RPS, 2011; OfSTED, 2019; Worth and Van Den Brande, 2019).
Discussions about the meaning and nature of ethical professional conduct and the effect of cultures, discourses and workplace practices typically concentrate around two particular considerations. The first is the impact, widely cited and critiqued in current literature on ethics and the professions, of the increased forms of managerialism and instrumentalism that have roundly been identified as detracting from the ethical and societal role of professionals. According to critics, the turn to managerialism across and within the professions has led not to a renewed form of professionalism but to a processes of de- and re-professionalisation through which the goals of general accountability (to service users and to government) and efficiency have actively worked against professional autonomy and judgement (Carr, 2011; Holbeche and Springett, 2004; Dixon-Woods et al., 2011). The second consideration is the extent to which professions, such as health, teaching and social work, have come under increased public scrutiny and accountability in the wake of various āscandalsā (Seijts et al., 2017; Arthur et al., 2019a). Over the last 25 years in England, for example, high-profile cases including the murder of Stephen Lawrence and resulting Stephen Lawrence Inquiry (known commonly as the Macpherson Report), the murder of Victoria ClimbiĆ©, the death of Peter Connelly (also known as Baby P), the Mid Staffordshire hospital crisis and the Rotherham Child Sexual Exploitation scandal have all raised serious questions about what were significant failures in professionalsā ethical judgement and conduct.
In the context of managerialism, accountability, efficiency, public scrutiny and increased workplace pressures, professions and professionals need to (re)envisage the ethical nature of their work. This (re)envisaging by necessity includes paying attention to what a profession aspires to be, what constitutes professional practice ā whether generally or specifically for that profession ā and how external factors shape the standing and work of professions today (see, for example, Berwick, 2016). In the next section we start to examine these questions through a focus on a virtue-based approach to pro...