eBook - ePub
Adam, Christ and Covenant
A. T. B. McGowan
This is a test
Share book
- 224 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Adam, Christ and Covenant
A. T. B. McGowan
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
McGowan reviews challenges to and disagreements over Reformed covenant theology and proposes that its strengths can best be retained by separating the two key ideas of union with Adam/Christ and God's covenantal dealings with his people.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Adam, Christ and Covenant an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Adam, Christ and Covenant by A. T. B. McGowan in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Theology & Religion & Christian Theology. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Topic
Theology & ReligionSubtopic
Christian TheologyPART 1
The context
In this first section of the book we shall provide an outline of covenant theology, as developed in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and as âcodifiedâ in the Westminster Confession of Faith, noting that this was once the dominant theological perspective of Christian theologians in the Reformed tradition.
Then we shall consider the main opposition to covenant theology from within the Reformed tradition itself, namely, from Karl Barth and from two of those who followed in his trajectory, T. F. Torrance and J. B. Torrance.
Next, we shall consider the internal debates which have taken place among proponents of Reformed theology who are committed to covenant theology but have offered varying and in some cases revisionist accounts of the system: first, John Murray, then Meredith Kline and finally the school of federal theology.
In this way, we shall provide the general context of current studies in covenant theology, preparing the way for our own proposal in part 2 of the book.
Chapter 1
Covenant theology
Introduction
The purpose of this chapter is to describe covenant theology and to offer a brief sketch of its historical development. We shall focus particularly on Scottish covenant theology so as to prepare for our later examination of the theology of John Murray, whose significant critique of covenant theology (while holding to its core elements) provides the launching pad for our own proposed challenge to the system.
Covenant theology can be defined as that system of theology in which the relationship between God and humanity is described in covenantal terms. In particular, the focus is on Adam and Christ as the heads of two covenants between God and human beings. In its full-blown form, as we shall see, this involved a complex arrangement of covenants and headship. Covenant theology developed in the post-Reformation period but many theologians in earlier periods had made significant use of the covenant theme, which is so prevalent in Scripture.1 Others had offered interpretations of Paulâs comparison between being in Adam and being in Christ.2
Exposition
The classic exposition of covenant theology teaches that God entered into a âcovenant of worksâ with Adam in Genesis 2:16â17, whereby Adam was prohibited from eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. He was told that if he did eat from this tree, he would die, with the corresponding implication that, if he refrained from doing so, he would live. Most covenant theologians asserted that, if Adam had succeeded in obeying God during this period of âprobationâ and had not eaten from the forbidden tree, he would have been granted eternal life. This would have involved the permanent conferral of the blessings he already enjoyed in his state of innocence and much more besides.
One vital aspect of covenant theology is that, when God entered into the covenant of works with Adam, he did not do so with Adam as a private individual but as representative of the human race. Thus when Adam disobeyed God and broke the commandment not to eat from the forbidden tree, the judgment which followed fell not only upon Adam but upon all those whom he represented, namely, all humanity (who had not yet been born). This explains why every human being is already corrupted by sin from conception, often called âoriginal sinâ. Correspondingly, if Adam had obeyed God, then the permanent conferral of blessing would also have come to the entire human race.
Despite Adamâs disobedience, God did not abandon the human race, each member of which he had created in his own image. Indeed, at the very point of Adamâs fall, God made a promise, recorded in Genesis 3:15, that someone would come to destroy Satan, the instigator of Adamâs sin. This protoevangelion (first promise of the gospel) indicated that God intended to act decisively to overcome the failure of Adam. This action began in Genesis 12 with the call of Abraham, with whom God made a covenant, described in Genesis 15 and 17. Covenant theologians generally view this as the first expression of a âcovenant of graceâ which God made with his elect people, with Christ as the âheadâ of the covenant. The family of Abraham became, during a period in Egypt, the Hebrew tribes and then ultimately emerged from Egypt as a nation under God. The covenant between God and his chosen people was renewed at Sinai through Moses and the promises made to Abraham were fulfilled as Israel became a nation and was given the âPromised Landâ of Canaan.
The covenant of grace, first intimated to Abraham, involved looking forward to the day when the protoevangelion would be fulfilled and Messiah would come. Jeremiah indicated that God would then establish a ânew covenantâ in which all the blessings of salvation would come to Godâs chosen people. Until then, the sacrificial system and a high priest were in place. These sacrifices âcoveredâ the sins of the people until the day when they could be dealt with permanently. These temple sacrifices themselves could never deal permanently with sin but were types and signs, waiting to be fulfilled when Christ (Messiah) came as the great high priest and, with one sacrifice on the cross at Calvary, paid the penalty for the sins of all Godâs chosen people in all generations, bringing an end to the law in terms of its sacrificial system. Christ is head of this new covenant, in which the covenant of grace reaches its fulfilment, and all who call upon the name of the Lord will be saved. Christ is able to be the head of the covenant of grace because, although a man, he was born of a virgin and therefore not included under the representative headship of Adam in the covenant of works and hence not tainted with original sin. Also, since he was âconceived by the Holy Spiritâ, the Holy Spirit protected him from any effect of Maryâs sin.
Covenant theologians developed this concept of Adam and Christ as representative heads of two covenants from 1 Corinthians 15:21â22, 44bâ49 and Romans 5:12â21.3 These verses tell us that we are either âin Adamâ or âin Christâ. If we are âin Adamâ we shall die and if we are âin Christâ we shall be made alive. The parallel in these verses between Adam and Christ, in which Paul describes Christ as the âsecond manâ and the âlast Adamâ, is used to argue that, just as Adam was the representative head of the covenant of works, so Christ is the representative head of the covenant of grace. Christ takes the place of Adam and fulfils the covenant of works, succeeding where Adam failed and obeying where Adam disobeyed, thus bringing salvation to all those whom he represented, namely, Godâs elect. Most covenant theologians have also argued that underlying this covenant of grace was a covenant of redemption between God the Father and God the Son, in which the Father promised to forgive sins if the Son would come as representative and substitute, to make atonement for sinners. Christ freely and willingly accepted the terms of the covenant and the incarnation took place.
The whole covenant scheme is set in the context of the post-Reformation Calvinistic theology. Thus it is argued that God, from all eternity, elected a people for himself. Christ died to pay the penalty for the sins of Godâs elect people, bearing the wrath of God in their place, having qualified himself for this position by his incarnation and by his active obedience. The Holy Spirit then applies the work of Christ to the elect by effectual calling, regeneration, justification, sanctification and the other aspects of salvation which are summed up in the doctrines that make up the ordo salutis. The sacraments are viewed as signs and seals of the covenant of grace. Thus covenant theology seeks to be an all-embracing system of thought, based on Scripture and encompassing the whole scope of biblical teaching.
History
The scholarly debate concerning the historical development of covenant theology has largely taken place during the past forty years. In the course of this debate, several volumes have sought, inter alia, to chart the history of covenant theology.4 Although these volumes represent different theological perspectives, both for and against covenant theology, there is now growing agreement on the main line of development.
All Christian theologians must find a place for âcovenantâ in their systems since it is such a recurring, even dominant, concept in the Scriptures. It was, however, in the Calvinist strand of Reformation theology that the concept came to be the central means of expressing the relationship between God and humanity. There is, however, disagreement among scholars as to Calvinâs own position. Some have argued that there is a radical discontinuity between Calvin and the later covenant theology,5 whereas others argue that Calvin was one of the originators of covenant theology.6 Many who would hesitate to take this latter position would nonetheless argue that covenant theology is a natural and legitimate development from Calvinâs own thought.7 It is certainly clear that the covenant was very important in Calvinâs theology.8 The debate which took place between these three different interpretations, together with the work of those who do not fit neatly into any of these three categories,9 has been called the âCalvin versus Calvinismâ debate. The recently published work by Andrew A. Woolsey, supporting earlier work by Richard Muller, makes a most persuasive case for the continuity argument.10
Covenant theology, as a two-covenant system, began with Zacharias Ursinus (1534â83), Caspar Olevianus (1536â87) and their colleagues in Heidelberg, between 1560 and 1590.11 There is no unanimous agreement as to the precise origin of the expression âfoedus operumâ (covenant of works), although David Weirâs argument that a prelapsarian covenant was first introduced into Reformed theology in 1562 by Ursinus and that Dudley Fenner, in 1585, first called it the foedus operum is very persuasive.12 This is supported by David Poole:
The centre of covenant thought in the years immediately following 1562 was Heidelberg, the key figures being Ursinus and Olevianus. After that cityâs return to Lutheranism in 1576, continental covenant theology came to pivot on Herborn. The seeds of the notion of a first covenant preceding that of grace, had already been sown on the Continent, but it was Dudley Fenner who first introduced the foedus operum in his Sacra Theologia (Geneva 1585).13
Covenant theology was popularized by William Perkins (1558â1602) and was significantly advanced by the later German theologian Johannes Cocceius (1603â69). Covenant theology quickly took root and grew after this point. By the end of the seventeenth century, covenant theology had become the dominant theological position within Reformed theology. In the course of this development, however, covenant theology was expressed in different ways, such that there was no one definitive covenant theology, although most of the key elements were agreed. When covenant theology received confessional status, however, first in a very preliminary form in the Irish Articles of 1615 and then more fully in the Westminster Confession of Faith of 1646 (and its Congregationalist and Baptist variants), this became the definitive version most adopted by Reformed theologians.
The WCF deals with covenant theology in chapter 7, âOn Godâs Covenant with Manâ, and, given its influence, is worth quoting in full:
I. The distance between God and the creature is so great, that although reasonable creatures do owe obedience unto Him as their Creator, yet they could never have any fruition of Him as their blessedness and reward, but by some voluntary condescension on Godâs part, which He has been pleased to express by way of covenant.
II. The first covenant made with man was a covenant of works, wherein life was promised to Adam; and in him to his posterity, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience.
III. Man, by his fall, having made himself incapable of life by that covenan...