PART ONE
Launching your business
Chapter 1
Setting up your company
Avoid the barriers and traps
You have an idea for your new business. You might even have tested it out, started exploring how youāre going to fund it, and brought some co-founders on board to help you make it a success. Itās an exciting time.
And yet itās also the moment at which you might feel a bit stuck. Do you set up a company, and if so what kind? Should you raise investment at the beginning, or wait until later on? Is it a good idea to plan out the finances up front, or to see how things evolve? And out of the myriad things you have to do, what should you focus on first? It can feel overwhelming.
I speak to lots of entrepreneurs who are at this stage, and what I find time and again is that itās easy to let the technicalities of setting up your business distract you from your main goal: to start creating your product or service and making money from it. I call them the āFour Barriersā.
The Four Barriers
Barrier #1: worrying about what legal structure to use
Sometimes people spend months researching whether they should create a limited company, a social enterprise structure, or some other kind of entity. Please donāt waste time on this. If youāre in any doubt just set up a limited company, and you can always change it later ā itās flexible.
Barrier #2: over-complicating the documentation
Thereās no need at this stage to over-engineer any legal documentation. In fact, if you think you need highly specialised legal or accounting advice before choosing your business structure, youāre probably complicating things far too much.
Barrier #3: creating a complicated tax optimisation scheme
This is an eye-roller for solicitors and accountants (unless theyāre the kind who love to take your money, of course). As long as youāre not setting up an investment fund or a business that will only work if itās highly tax-optimised, thereās no need to even think about using an offshore structure.
The reasons for this are simple. Incorporating a company in a tax haven, such as the Cayman Islands, doesnāt in itself mean that the company doesnāt have to pay full UK tax. You also have to make sure that itās owned and managed from the Caymans (generally by the use of a complex trust scheme). That costs a lot of money and is pointless for a start-up that, currently, has no value. Whatās more, UK investors wonāt be eligible for tax relief if they invest in your business, which is a huge disincentive for them. You can worry about offshoring your business later, when you have to spare the Ā£50,000 that youāll need.
Barrier #4: getting bogged down in figures
Please donāt spend ages creating fiendishly complicated cap tables, with varying predictions of the percentage holdings of shareholders or investors once youāve been through five different investment rounds. At this stage you can spend your time more productively elsewhere. Excessive number crunching wonāt help you with the important tasks of setting up your company and making it a reality in the marketplace.
If any of these barriers are holding you back, you have full permission not to worry about them. Just push them to one side for now.
However, there are some elements of setting up a business that are worth thinking about from the beginning. If you donāt get them right then they can make your life difficult, deny you future opportunities, and scupper your chances of securing crucial investment. So that you can avoid them, the rest of this chapter will cover:
⢠the vital differences between for-profit and social enterprise structures, and the impact these can have on your businessā viability;
⢠what it means to create a company, and how to do it without causing future problems for yourself;
⢠how to pay yourself in a sustainable way; and
⢠the low-down on taxes and VAT.
For-profit company or social enterprise?
If your aim is to do good in the world, deciding whether your company should be a for-profit business or a social enterprise can be confusing. However, itās important that you understand the differences between the two set-ups if youāre not to regret your choice further down the line. So that you can see what I mean, Iām going to explain what social enterprises are first and then move on to for-profit companies.
Social enterprises
Although you may hear the phrase āsocial enterpriseā bandied about, itās not really a legal term but a label that covers three broad types of business:
⢠Pure not-for-profit businesses. Here, all the money made is ploughed back into the business to pay its costs and expand its social purpose.
⢠Businesses that are created to support a social purpose or community, but still return some value to their owners and investors. You can often find these kinds of companies in the education space, for instance, where certain businesses have a core community purpose but still need to attract investment. This is the kind of scheme that Lucio, our fictional entrepreneur, has in mind.
⢠Businesses that are primarily for-profit, but with the aim of trading in an ethical way or promoting a social purpose. Today an increasing number of start-ups are created with this aim, because entrepreneurs are often just as motivated by generating social change as they are by making money.
Does your business idea fall into one of these categories? If so, you may be thinking of setting it up as a formal social enterprise, but Iād probably advise you not to. To understand the reasons why, you need to know how these companies are structured and what that means for you. There are many different social enterprise structures, but here are the ones that crop up most often in the UK.
Community Interest Company (CIC)
This is the most common type, and is popular for businesses with a specific community purpose. Itās usually set up in a similar way to a for-profit business (in that it has shareholders who own it), but with one crucial difference: itās subject to a statutory asset lock. This stops more than a certain amount of the profits (a maximum of 35 percent) being paid to shareholders.
Itās worth thinking about the implications of this by comparing it to a standard for-profit company. In the latter, if you make Ā£100,000 profit you can ā in theory ā pay out all of it to your shareholders. But with a CIC thereās an asset lock, so you canāt distribute more than Ā£35,000. Discovering this limitation can be a major āhead in handsā moment for some CIC founders, and they often come to regret using this structure. How are they supposed to generate an income that both they and their shareholders can live on? Whatās more, once a business is structured via a CIC itās very hard to revert to a for-profit structure.
There is, however, one benefit to CICs, which is that social purpose grants are usually given only to asset-locked businesses. So if you think your funding will mainly come from grant money, a CIC makes absolute sense.
Company limited by guarantee
With guarantee companies, one or more people guarantee the liability of the company up to a certain amount. There are no shareholders or owners, and so no profits can be paid out. The only way to earn any money from such a company is to be a director or employee and be paid a salary. This structure tends to be used for charities and wholly not-for-profit entities.
You can see that a major sticking point with formal social enterprise structures is that there are restrictions on how they return value to their owners and investors. However, thereās another disadvantage which is also of huge importance: these structures are not optimised to attract investment. The reason for this is a series of tax incentive schemes available to investors in start-ups. Iāll explore them further in Chapter 10, but for now just be aware that the vast majority of UK angel investors use the schemes, and theyāre only applicable to for-profit businesses. Thereās an equivalent for social enterprises called social impact tax relief (SITR), but relatively few investors are interested in it. This means that being a formal social enterprise can close investment doors to you.
To me, the choice as to whether to use a formal social enterprise or for-profit structure largely comes down to how you expect to gain most of your funding. If it will be from community or social grants then youāll want to go down the social enterprise route, and if it will be from investors then youāll want the for-profit route. If youāre not sure, a for-profit structure is simpler and more flexible (at least in the early stages) because you can run it pretty much how you like and ā if itās important to you ā still be socially responsible in the way that you do business. Also, while you can switch to being a social enterprise at a later date, itās harder to do the same the other way around. If your main aim is to trade ethically or to improve the world in some way, ask yourself whether you can achieve that better via a successful for-profit business.
For-profit businesses
So youāve decided to set up a for-profit business. Your most likely structure will be that of a limited company, but itās worth understanding two other structures that are relevant: sole tradership and a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP).
Sole trader
When you set up in business as a sole trader, youāre simply trading as yourself. All you need to do is to notify the tax authority, in the UK HMRC, that youāre self-employed, and pay taxes on your profits at the end of the year.
However, the downside is that youāre personally responsible for any losses that you make. So if your business goes bust, your home and assets are on the line and you can be made bankrupt. Just as importantly, if you have ambitions to build a sizeable business, being a sole trader isnāt scalable. You canāt raise investment, and itās more complicated to register for value added tax (VAT) and operate as a VAT registered business. We discuss VAT later in this chapter.
Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)
Some people set up LLPs because the owners have limited liability and the structure has certain tax advantages. Instead of the LLP paying tax on its overall profits, as happens with a company, the owners pay income tax on their individual shares of profits each year. However, LLPs are clunky to operate and not easy to scale. Also, investors prefer investing in limited companies because of the tax breaks available to people investing in those kinds of businesses. As a result, LLPs tend to be used only by professionals such as solicitors, accountants, and architects.
Limited company
This is the important one. A limited company is a separate legal āpersonā, owned by its shareholders. It can enter into contracts, borrow money, employ people, and sell shares in itself to raise money. It can do most of the things that people do, apart from make a mean cup of coffee and come up with cool ideas.
There are a number of advantages to setting up a limited company:
⢠itās the structure chosen by the UK government for investor tax reliefs, so investors are more inclined to invest in limited companies than they are in any other structure;
⢠the company has limited liability, so if its business goes bust the personal assets of its shareholders are protected;
⢠although the company pays tax on its profits (corporation tax), its shareholders donāt pay any personal tax until they take money out of it, or sell their shares in it; and
⢠itās easy to set up and operate ā in fact, ridiculously easy. In the UK you can do it yourself online, and thereās no minimum sum you have to put in. This is in contrast to some other countries, where you have to invest the equivalent of thousands of pounds just to get a company up and running as well as jump through numerous bureaucratic hoops.
And the downside? Itās more expensive to operate than if youāre a sole trader. You have to file an annual corporation tax return and accounts with HMRC (which will probably cost you between Ā£750 and Ā£2,000 in accountancy fees), and lodge an annual confirmation statement with Companies House. Having said that, you can see how itās the structure youād choose if you have aspirations for your start-up to be scalable and attractive to investors.
Setting up your company ā what country to choose
If youāre planning on incorporating your company in the UK you can skip this, but if youāre thinking of basing it abroad there are some important things you need to know. You wouldnāt want to deny yourself valuable opportunities, or saddle yourself with huge legal and accountancy costs for no reason.
Your number one consideration is where your investors are likely to be based, because investors usually prefer to buy into companies in the same jurisdiction as their own. This is when you might tell me youāre planning on snaring some Silicon Valley cash and will therefore set up your company in the US, but you have to be realistic. If your initial customer base is in the UK or Europe, and if your main networks are also there, it makes little sense for you to set up a company thousands of miles away. Also, a UK company can attract UK investo...