Part 1:
How We Got Here
Chapter 1:
āYou must always be able to predict whatās next and then have the flexibility to evolve.ā
āMarc Benioff, Salesforce CEO.
While there is no United Nations (UN) official ranking for developed countries, the United States has the worldās largest economy by nominal GDP and net wealth. It is the leader in rapidly evolving industries and technological advances such as in computers, pharmaceuticals, medical, aerospace, and military equipment. These factors, without a doubt, put the US among one of the most developed nations on Earth.
The US economy is also heavily dependent on road transport for moving people and goods. Personal transportation is dominated by automobiles, which operate on a network of 4.2 million miles (6.8 million km) of public roads, including one of the worldās longest highway systems at 67,300 miles (108,000 km). The US has the worldās second-largest automobile market after China; and with 838 per 1,000 Americans, it has the third-highest rate of per capita vehicle ownership in the world only after San Marino and Monaco.,
Amidst endless discussions on the developed and yet very imperfect US transportation system, and after having lived for nearly fourteen years in the United States and having been fully dependent on public transportation at times, I cannot help but ask myself ā why does a very developed nation like the US have relatively low levels of public transit ridership compared to wealthy European and Asian countries? To me this was a paradox indeed, and weāll take a closer look at what caused the US transportation system to reach this point and the factors driving such a large dependency on personal vehicles.
A Disorganized Expansion
In 2011, during a conference at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a foreign policy think tank with centers in Washington, DC, Moscow, Beirut, Brussels, and New Delhi, keynote speaker David Burwell (ā ) referred to the modern history of the US transportation system, with the Interstate Highway System as the foundation, and highlighted the associated large financial investments:,
āThe modern history of the transportation system is the creation of the Interstate Highway System in 1956. The idea was every major capital in the United States should be connected with at least a four-lane interstate highway. It was a twelve-year project costing $27 billion. This was in 1956, and in fact it was only declared complete in 1991.ā
āThe total cost was $425 billion, in 1991 dollars. So, it took longer, but itās a major infrastructure improvement and it has been the foundation of Americaās economic development over the last fifty years.ā
āWhen the Interstate Highway System was finally declared complete in 1991, the program was made more flexible to fund not only highways, but a wide variety of transportation projects from transit to buses, to bus rapid transit to streetcars to bikes.ā
Although Burwell expressed his admiration for such a massive and bold movement in the transportation sector, he also suggested this transit system lacked direction and focus in the years following completion of the interstate.
āThere was no directive, however, for a specific additional system. The result was many states continued to just build highways or felt they could build projects rather than a system. It became highly earmarked, highly project-focused, and therefore unfocused.ā
On a similar note, Joseph Stromberg, former writer at Vox, an American news and opinion website owned by Vox media, shared his insights on the rapid deployment of personal vehicles across different American cities.
āMost of our cities and suburbs were built out after the 1950s when the car became the dominant mode of transportation. Consequently, we have sprawling, auto-centric metropolises that just canāt be easily served by public transportation.ā
An Overlooked Public Transit
Despite the common belief the development of the US post-1950s made a poor transit system inevitable, the truth is, Stromberg claims, if we look closer at transportation history in other countries, we realize they combined suburbs with better transit. As a matter of fact, David King, an assistant professor of urban planning at Columbia University and Arizona State University in the 1950s, stated the United States, Canada, Germany, France, the UK, and Australia were all on the same trajectory of racing toward automobile dependence, and yet in the 1960s a divergence was evident.
Stromberg suggests in the 1960s many European cities put large efforts into maintaining already existing transit systems and expanded them to growing suburbs. Similarly, newer cities in Western Canadaāeven though they were being designed for personal vehiclesāheavily invested in light rail lines and improved quality bus service, translating into higher levels of public transportation ridership than US cities of similar size and density.
Conversely in the United States, the gradual expansion of newer cities in the West and South did not come with the necessary associated investment in public transportation. In certain big cities such expansion dismantled their existing transit systems, replacing streetcar (aka trolley or tram) lines with highways to accelerate commutes from the suburbs. An example of this is Boston; transit blogger Alon Levy explains:
āIn 1912, Boston had this great public transit system with four subway lines and streetcars that fed it⦠Then they spent the next sixty or seventy years destroying it.ā
If you ask me, the results of a long-overlooked US public transportation system are visible today. Public transit is indeed much more reliable and effective in European countries th...