The Complementary Therapist's Guide to Red Flags and Referrals

Clare Stephenson

• Publisher: Churchill Livingstone
• Year: 2011
• Print ISBN: 9780702047664
• eBook ISBN: 9780702054334
• Topic: Medicine
• Subtopic: Alternative & Complementary Medicine

Unique ready reference for all complementary medicine, massagetherapy and manual therapy practitioners andstudents alerting them to 'red flag' symptomswhich should be referred for Western medicalinvestigation or emergency medical treatment.When can a patient be safely reassured and whendo they need further investigation or treatment?'Red flags' are clinical signs that suggest a patientneeds prompt investigation and treatment fora potentially dangerous situation. Therapistsincreasingly find themselves working alongsideconventionally trained doctors and nurses and it isvital for them to understand conventional medicaldiagnoses, symptoms and treatments and, crucially, to recognise warning signs of serious disease. Thisis essential in order to be a safe practitioner.Clare Stephenson's The Complementary Therapist'sGuide to Red Flags and Referrals meets this need byproviding an easily accessible reference to 'red flag'symptoms, designed especially for therapists. It offersguidance on how best to respond to those symptomsand signs of disease which can be readily discernedthrough routine history taking and basic examinationof the body. The guidance is in language which isaccessible to therapists, and clear advice is offeredon when to refer patients to conventional medicinepractitioners and how to communicate with doctorswhen making a referral.Clinical syndromes which merit rapid response aresummarised for ease of reference.

Chapter 1 Red flags of disease

Red flags are those symptoms and signs which, if elicited by therapist, either of conventional or complementary medicine, merit referral to a conventional doctor. Referral is indicated because the presence of red flags indicates the possibility of a condition which either may not respond fully to non-medical treatment or may benefit further from conventional diagnosis, advice or treatment.

In summary, referral may be considered for the following four broad reasons:

1. To enable the patient to have access to medical treatment which will benefit their condition.

2. For investigations to exclude the possibility of serious disease.

3. For investigations to confirm a diagnosis and help guide treatment.

4. For access to advice on the management of a complex condition.

It is important to clarify at this stage that the red flags indicate those potentially serious conditions in which the patient would be in need of further tests, advice or treatment. Not all of the red flag conditions listed in this text indicate that the patient will need medical treatment. In some cases referral is advised so that the patient can have tests to exclude an unlikely but important treatable condition (e.g. a mole that might have features of skin cancer), or to obtain a medical diagnosis to guide in the future management of the condition (e.g. ascertaining the severity and cause of suspected anaemia). In other situations it may be important to refer so that the patient can have access to detailed medical advice (e.g. on the complexity of assessing coronary risk and how this impacts on subsequent choice of medical treatment).

Use of complementary medicine and red flags

There are very few examples of when complementary medicine would not be beneficial to someone who is also receiving conventional investigation or treatment for a condition. Therefore, referral in response of a patient with red flag symptoms or signs does not mean that complementary medical treatment need be discontinued, as long as the therapist is sure that the patient has given informed consent to this treatment.

The red flags as guides to referral

Red flags are guides to referral and not absolute indicators. Often the red flags described in this text specify a fixed, measurable point at which referral should be considered, for example high fever (especially if over 40°C) not responding to treatment within 2 hours in a child. Of course, in reality, disease falls somewhere along a spectrum which bridges the state of being of little concern and one of being of serious concern (see Figure 1.1). A disease does not suddenly become serious once a fixed point has passed. Moreover, what might constitute a red flag in one individual may be of less concern in someone of a stronger constitution.

Figure 1.1 This illustrates the fact that red flags have to fall at a fixed point along the spectrum of symptoms of mild to serious disease.

Bearing the potential flexibility of interpretation of red flag syndromes in mind, there may well be situations in which the clinical opinion of the therapist is that referral is unnecessary even though a red flag is present. Conversely if a nagging uncertainty persists in a clinical situation, even if the patient does not fit the criteria for any of the red flags, then it is safest to trust clinical instincts and refer. The important thing is that there is an awareness of these indicators of possible serious disease, and that in every case time has been taken to consider their relevance for patients in the clinical situation.

Prioritisation of the red flags

The various red flags merit different responses from the practitioner according to the nature of the underlying condition of which they may be an indication. To aid with decision making in the clinical situation, the red flags listed in this text are assigned to one or more of three categories of urgency.

These categories are:

*Non-urgent: A non-urgent referral means that the patient can be encouraged to make a routine appointment with the medical practitioner (GP) and this ideally will take place within 7 days at the most.

**High priority: A high priority referral means that the patient is assessed by a medical practitioner within the same day.

***Urgent: The urgent category is for those situations when the patient requires immediate medical attention, and this may mean summoning an on-call doctor or calling the paramedics to the scene.

The summaries of red flags which make up the appendix to this chapter indicate which category (ies) of urgency best fits each red flag. Again, this categorisation is simply a guide to the degree of urgency rather than a fixed directive on the appropriate response in a particular clinical situation.

For many of the listed red flags, the labelling indicates a range of degrees of priority (for example, */**). For these red flags, the precise level of priority depends upon other characteristics of the individual case, which should become clear according to the particular clinical situation.

How to respond to the red flags

The response to a red flag in a clinical situation depends very much upon what degree of urgency the response merits. In this book, the detail of the advice given relates to the practicalities of referral to a GP or emergency hospital department within the UK National Health Service. However, this advice is readily transferable to any national provider of medical health care, as in all there are systems whereby a generalist doctor can be consulted for non-urgent medical conditions and emergency services can be accessed for conditions requiring urgent medical assessment.

Non-Urgent Red Flags

Some red flags are indicators of possible serious disease, and yet the patient does not require urgent treatment, even if the disease actually is present. An example of this is the patient who has features of anaemia, including pallor, breathlessness and palpitations on exertion. Anaemia can have serious underlying causes, for example chronic gastrointestinal bleeding or pernicious anaemia, some of which cannot be expected to respond fully to non-medical therapies. In a case of anaemia, the patient obviously requires further investigation and may possibly require medical treatment according to the outcome of the investigations. However, if the symptoms have been developing over the course of weeks to months, the patient does not need to be seen by the doctor on the same day.

Another example of a non-urgent red flag is the well child who has symptoms which indicate occasional bouts of mild asthma. In this case referral is recommended more for confirmation of diagnosis, and so that the patient can have access to medical advice about how to manage a potentially serious condition, rather than simply for treatment. It will be obvious that in such a situation the child does not need to be seen urgently.

Most of the red flags of cancer have been prioritised as of non-urgent priority. This is because such features usually have taken weeks to develop, and 1 or 2 days’ delay is not critical in the course of most cancers. In the UK, the NHS referral system is structured so that the patient demonstrating red flag signs of cancer is seen by a hospital specialist within 2 weeks of referral by their GP, so to be seen by the GP within only a few days of referral would be ideal in order to minimise the total wait. Of course, there will be some situations in which it would be appropriate to make a high priority referral for patients showing features of cancer, either because of rapidity of progression of symptoms, or in order to allay anxiety for the patient.

Those red flags which have been categorised as non-urgent will require non-urgent referral. In these situations it can be suggested to the patient to make a non-urgent appointment with the GP. This means that the patient will be seen within the next few days. In this situation a letter of referral can be prepared, although this may not be necessary if the patient is capable of passing on the essential information verbally. If a letter is needed, it can either be taken to the doctor by the patient (most reliable approach) or can be sent by post to the practice (more likely to be delayed or go astray). A guide to writing letters of referral to doctors can be found in Chapter 5, ‘Communicating with medical professionals’.

High Priority Red Flags

Some of the listed red flags are indicators of serious disease, and these merit seeking a medical opinion on the same day, because there is a possibility that the condition of the patient might deteriorate rapidly without treatment. An example of a high priority case is the situation of haemoptysis (coughing up blood) in a man who has lost two stone in weight over the past few months (strong indicators of lung cancer or TB). In this case, the potential of serious blood loss or the possibility of contagiousness makes the referral high priority.

In high priority situations, it may be best practice to speak to the patient’s medical doctor. It is appropriate in such cases to telephone the patient’s practice to confirm a time in that day when it is most convenient to talk to one of the doctors. After discussion, if the doctor agrees with your assessment of urgency, an appropriate appointment f...

Table of contents

• Cover image
• Title page
• Table of Contents
• Copyright
• Preface
• Foreword
• Foreword
• Foreword
• Acknowledgements
• Chapter 1: Red flags of disease
• Chapter 2: A tables: Red flags ordered by physiological system
• Chapter 3: B tables: Red flags ordered by symptom keyword
• Chapter 4: C tables: Red flags requiring urgent referral
• Chapter 5: Communicating with medical practitioners
• Chapter 6: Red flags and referrals: Ethical points
• Further reading
• Index