
- 322 pages
- English
- PDF
- Available on iOS & Android
About this book
Academic standards in higher education depend on the judgements of individual academics assessing student work; it is in these micro-level practices that the validity and fairness of assessment is constituted. However, the quality of assessments of open-ended tasks like the coursework essay is difficult to ascertain because of the complex and subjective nature of the judgements involved. In view of current concerns about assessment quality and standards, this book is a timely reflection on the practices of academic judgement at university. It explores assessment quality through an empirical study of essay marking in an undergraduate discipline where large class sizes and significant numbers of second language students are common. The study shows that assessors vary in their interpretations of criteria and standards and that this results in inconsistent grading of essays. The book contributes to a growing scholarship of assessment with an evidence-based explanation of why assessors disagree and a discussion of the implications of this for the validity of assessment practices at university.
Frequently asked questions
- Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
- Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.4M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app.
Information
Table of contents
- Cover
- Contents
- Preface 9
- 1. Introduction 11
- 2. A review of the literature on writing assessment 23
- 3. Method 87
- 4. Results 151
- 5. Discussion 209
- 6. Conclusion 241
- Bibliography 255
- Appendix A: Verbal report characteristics 283
- Appendix B: Instructions to assessors 289
- Appendix C: Coding sub-categories 291
- Appendix D: Comment distributions by essay 299
- Appendix E: Comment distributions by assessor 305
- Appendix F: Post hoc analysis for chi-square tests of independence 315
- Appendix G: All essay marks 321