OVERVIEW: Paul wrote this letter to churches in Galatia that he had founded but that had subsequently been led astray by false apostles who preached that Gentiles had to accept circumcision and the law of Moses as part of the gospel. Adding these requirements detracted from the work of Christ, who offers believers justification by faith in him, without regard to what they have done. The Galatians were a Celtic people distantly related to the Germans, which gives their situation a special interest for modern Germans, but more importantly, the danger of teaching that people must work to become righteous is ever- present and must be combated just as much today as it was by Paul.
THE FOOLISHNESS OF THE GALATIANS. DESIDERIUS ERASMUS: Although the Galatians were Greeks, they were originally descended from Frenchmen, and as Saint Jerome says, resembled them in their stupidity.1 . . . Saint Paul also in this present epistle reproves them by calling them anoetous, that is to say, witless or foolish. He adjusts his teaching to suit their capacities and reproves them more vehemently and sharply than he does in his other epistles . . . checking them rather than teaching them, to the intent that those who could not be brought to a better mind might at least be called home again by his authority and put right. In this epistle Paul is concerned about the same matter that he discusses everywhere else. He wants to call people from the bondage of Mosesā law to the grace of the gospel, which is also the subject of his epistle to the Romans, because both churches had fallen into the same error. PARAPHRASES.
THE GALATIANS MUST BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE GOSPEL. MARTIN LUTHER: Although the Galatians had been taught sound faith by the apostle, that is, to trust in Jesus Christ alone and not in their own righteousness or in that of the law, they were turned away from this by false apostles who taught them to put their trust in works of legalistic righteousness. They were easily deceived by those people, who used the name and reputation of the apostles falsely. . . . As Peter explained in Acts 15:7-11, the apostles had permitted these practices because they were harmless to those who put their trust in Jesus Christ for their salvation. To those who believe in Christ, external ceremonies are neither here nor there. Paul was so determined to bring the Galatians back to this understanding that he took no account of the rank of Peter or the other apostles. He even boasted with a kind of holy pride that he received nothing from themāon the contrary, they had approved of him. He made no concession to the opinion of other apostles because he saw that the truth of the gospel was being compromised, and he thought it far better that both he and the other apostles should lose their reputation than that the gospel should be made null and void. FIRST LECTURES ON GALATIANS.
THE TEACHING OF THE FALSE APOSTLES MUST BE DEFEATED. WILLIAM TYNDALE: As you read [in Acts 15], certain men came from Jerusalem to Antioch and vexed the disciples there, affirming that they could not be saved except they were circumcised. Even so after Paul had converted the Galatians and coupled them to Christ, to trust in him only for remission of sin and hope of grace and salvation, and was departed, there came false apostles to them (as to the Corinthians and to all places where Paul had preached) and that in the name of Peter, James and John, whom they called the apostles, and preached circumcision and the keeping of the law, to be saved by, and diminished Paulās authority. To the confounding of those, Paul magnifies his office and apostleship in the two first chapters and makes himself equal to the high apostles, and he concludes that everyone must be justified without deserving, without works and without help of the law, but alone by Christ. And in the third and fourth, he proves the same with Scripture examples and similitudes and shows that the law is cause of more sin and brings the curse of God on us and justifies us not; but that justifying comes by grace promised us of God through the deserving of Christ, by whom (if we believe) we are justified without help of the works of the law. And in the fifth and sixth he exhorts unto the works of love that follow faith and justifying. So in all his epistle he observes this order. First he preaches the damnation of the law, then the justifying of faith and thirdly the works of love. For on that condition that we love and work is the mercy given us. NEW TESTAMENT PREFACE TO GALATIANS.
THERE ARE TWO KINDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. MARTIN LUTHER: I can hardly believe that when I delivered these lectures on Galatians I was as long-winded as this book shows I was. But I recognize that the thoughts set down here by the diligence of my coworkers are really mine and that most if not all of them were actually spoken by me. In my heart only one doctrine rulesāfaith in Christ. From it, through it and to it all my thinking about theology flows and returns day and night, yet I am aware that I have grasped no more than the first fruits and fragments of such infinite wisdom. My teaching is that there is a clear distinction between two kinds of righteousness, the active and the passive, so that morality must not be confused with faith, works must not take the place of grace and secular society must not prevail over religion. Both kinds of righteousness are necessary, but each of them has its limits. Christian righteousness applies to the new person and the righteousness of the law applies to the old person, who is born of flesh and blood. The old person bears an oppressive burden and cannot enjoy the freedom of the Spirit until he has put on the new person in Christ, but that does not happen fully in this life. . . . We must learn to distinguish these two types of righteousness so that we shall know how far we ought to obey the law. In a Christian the law should rule only over the flesh and not over the conscience. Give the law its due, but do not let it exceed its jurisdiction. SECOND LECTURES ON GALATIANS.
THE FALSE APOSTLES MIXED THE LAW WITH THE GOSPEL. HEINRICH BULLINGER: There was a particularly nasty type of person who wandered around the churches that the apostles had foundedāthe ancients called them Nazaraeans. They were originally a branch of the Pharisees and were essentially Jews, even if they called themselves Christians. Because they had not yet had the benefit of Christās grace, they mixed the law with the gospel and argued that nobody can be saved by Christ unless he is also circumcised and keeps the law of Moses. In ancient times this epistle of Paulās enjoyed the highest authority and respect in all the churches, and it is not easy to convey just how great its value and usefulness is. To put it simply, the greatest mysteries of our faith are expounded in it, and with considerable skill. It is short, but even in that brevity you will find an amazing wealth if you examine it carefully. Paul speaks out in this epistle as he does nowhere else, but its very sharpness makes it more compelling than any of his other letters. COMMENTARY ON PAULāS EPISTLES.
GOD IS THE GOD OF GENTILES AS WELL AS JEWS. ERASMUS SARCERIUS: This epistle to the Galatians is polemical in nature because in it Paul is upbraiding the Galatians for having so easily turned away from the true doctrine of the gospel and fallen into the works of the law, which they were preaching as necessary for justification. But when Paul starts teaching about true righteousness, which is found in Christ Jesus without regard to the law or to works, the tone changes and the epistle becomes more didactic in nature. In the first part of the epistle he calls the Galatians back from the error of justification by works into which they had fallen because of the teaching of false apostles who had visited them after his departure. In the second part he teaches what the difference is between the righteousness that comes from faith and the righteousness that comes from works. In the epistle to the Romans, Paulās main argument is that God is the God not only of the Jews but also of the Gentiles. In order to prove this he brings in all kinds of considerations, and to make things as clear as possible he adopts the technique of starting with an explanation of righteousness by faith, to which the Gentiles have been called by grace. He then describes the righteousness that comes by the law, under which the Jews had struggled until Christ came teaching justification by faith, without reference to works. In this epistle, Paul does exactly the same thing. The false apostles had led the people astray by preaching circumcision and the works of the law, insisting that they were nec...