Space does not permit an elaboration of these various perspectives except to note that what they have in common is bifurcation: inappropriately separating that which (we might say) God has joined together. Each of them, I contend, misunderstands both Scripture and spirituality/spiritual formation. In my view, these sorts of bifurcated perspectives are misguided and, indeed, dangerous, both intellectually and spiritually.
UNDERSTANDING THE NEW TESTAMENTâS âBOTH-ANDâ DYNAMIC
We can divide the six sorts of bifurcated approaches to reading Scripture noted above into two major categories: the vertical versus the horizontal (group 1: bifurcations 1â3),3 and the spiritual versus the intellectual (group 2: bifurcations 4â6). We may respond to each of these two major categories with two simple phrases: âGod and neighborâ and âheart and mind.â
God and neighbor. We begin with the vertical versus horizontal bifurcations (1â3). The terms spirituality and spiritual formation are sometimes misunderstood to refer to a private experience of God that has no relationship to life in the real world and no necessary relationship to how we engage with others. What we find throughout the New Testament, however, is that our relationship with God is inseparable from our relationship with our neighbor. We find this inseparable connection expressed in various ways. A few samples will have to suffice.
-
⌠Like many ancient Jews, Jesus summarized the requirements of the Law and the Prophets as love of God and love of neighbor: âThe first [commandment of all] is, âHear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.â The second is this, âYou shall love your neighbor as yourself.â There is no other commandment greater than theseâ (Mk 12:29-31; cf. Mt 22:37-40; Lk 10:27-28).4
-
⌠âBut when you thus sin against members of your family [lit. âyour brothersâ], and wound their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ.â (1 Cor 8:12)
-
⌠âWhen you come together, it is not really to eat the Lordâs supper. For when the time comes to eat, each of you goes ahead with your own supper, and one goes hungry and another becomes drunk. What! Do you not have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you show contempt for the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing?â (1 Cor 11:20-22)
-
⌠âFor he is our peace; in his flesh he has made both groups into one and has broken down the dividing wall, that is, the hostility between us . . . for through him both of us have access in one Spirit to the Father.â (Eph 2:14, 18)
-
⌠âReligion [or âdevotionâ; CEB] that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to care for orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world.â (Jas 1:27)
-
⌠âBut no one can tame the tongueâa restless evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this ought not to be so.â (Jas 3:8-10)
-
⌠âWe know love by this, that he laid down his life for usâand we ought to lay down our lives for one another. How does Godâs love abide in anyone who has the worldâs goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses help?â (1 Jn 3:16-17)
-
⌠âNo one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God lives in us, and his love is perfected in us. . . . Those who say, âI love God,â and hate their brothers or sisters, are liars; for those who do not love a brother or sister whom they have seen, cannot love God whom they have not seen.â (1 Jn 4:12, 20)
All of these texts demonstrate that theology has consequences for how we treat our neighbor; that spirituality is about a relationship with both God and neighborâsimultaneously and inextricably. New Testament spirituality is personal, but it is not private.
What is fascinating about this brief selection of texts is how it shows the God-neighbor link in connection with various spiritual topics: love of God, relationship with Christ, experience of Christ in the Lordâs Supper, peace with God, devotion to God, blessing of God, experiencing love from God, and having God within. Many people would refer to these topics as in some sense âmystical.â Yet they are all also concerned about other people. There is no New Testament mysticism, or spirituality, without a connection to others; no vertical without the horizontal.5
Considering the goal of loving God and neighbor together, inseparably, leads us next to consider another inseparability in spiritual formation according to the New Testament: loving God with our minds as well as our hearts.
Heart and mind (and more). We turn next to bifurcations 4â6. It is sometimes thought that Christians do not need theology or rigorous, academic study of the Bible, since all that matters for spiritual growth in Bible reading is having a prayerful attitude, an openness to the Spirit. However, while prayerfulness and openness are always necessary for spiritual growth through Scripture study, they are not always sufficient.
A creative and helpful way to think about this matter was offered by N. T. Wright at the Synod of Roman Catholic bishops on the Word of God, which occurred in Rome in October 2008. Wright was, at the time, Bishop of Durham in the Church of England and an invited special guest at the Synod. Titled âThe Fourfold Amor Dei [Love of God] and the Word of God,â Wrightâs brief message drew on the words of Jesus (quoting the Shema; Deut 6:5) that we should love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength (Mk 12:29-30).6 Wright suggested that we think of engaging Scripture as employingâand balancingâthese four aspects of our humanity.
We read with the heart, meaning meditatively and prayerfully, as in the medieval practice of lectio divina (âsacred readingâ) that has enjoyed a transdenominational comeback in recent years.7 We read also with the soul, meaning in communion with the life and teaching of the church. We read as well with the mind, meaning through rigorous historical and intellectual work. And finally, said Wright, we read with our strength, meaning that we put our study into action through the churchâs mission in service to the kingdom of God.
Wrightâs words remind us that we cannot love God with only part of our being, which means that if we are reading Scripture to better know and love God, it will require the use of our minds. And that further means doing the hard work of rigorous study of the Scriptures. This does not imply that every Christian needs to be a trained New Testament scholar. But it does imply that carefully engaging New Testament theology to the best of our ability is an obligationâand a privilege!âgiven to all Christians. Loving God with our minds is one aspect of spiritual formation, and one way in which we are able to grow to maturity in Christ. Paul speaks of the need to âbring every thought into captivity and obedience to Christâ (2 Cor 10:5 NJB). This is doing theology, and when we read the New Testament with this approach (meaning with heart, soul, mind, and strength), we are both studying and doing New Testament theology. New Testament theology is inherently formational.
This last sentence contains a claim that requires a bit more unpacking.
One way of understanding the term theology is this: talk about God and all things in relation to God. Such a definition allows the possibility of a purely analytical approach to âdoing theology,â including studying the theology we find in the New Testament. But the phrase âall things in relation to Godâ clearly invites us to do more than hold the contents of the New Testament at armsâ length. Another, ancient way of understanding theology is as âfaith seeking understanding,â a phrase that comes from the great theologian Anselm (1033â1109). I would suggest, however, that Anselmâs definition needs expanding in light of Scriptureâs own testimony about what it means to seek to understand God and all things in relation to God: âfaith seeking understanding seeking discipleship.â That is, theology involves mind and heart and soul and body.
Theologians and other scholars often distinguish the study of New Testament theology from âtheological interpretation.â8 The former is allegedly an academic pursuit that does not require a faith commitment, even if it permits one. The latter, on the other hand, exists only when such a commitment is present. My proposed reworking of Anselmâs definition of theology challenges this distinction. The New Testament is itself theology, a collection of early Christian theological writings whose focus is Christology and discipleshipâand these two dimensions are inseparable. That is, the New Testament writings are meant to proclaim Christ and to form Christians, or what Martin Luther described as âChrists to one anotherâ and C. S. Lewis called âlittle Christs.â9 The New Testament is theology seeking faith, so to speak; theology seeking spiritual formation in its hearers and readers. And because Christian spirituality must keep the vertical and the horizontal together, this spiritual formation will include formation in Christian ethics and mission.
Since spiritual formation is thei...