When Martin Luther King Jr. moved to Montgomery, Alabama, in the spring of 1954, civil rights activism was not on his mind. King went to Montgomery because the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church offered a great salary, a comfortable parsonage and a highly educated congregation. The fact that King wasnât looking to become an activist did not come as a disappointment to the congregation. Dexter Avenue had no interest in hiring a racial crusader. Its members had long prided themselves on their access to white elites and their own relative social privilege. Though they shared a common hope for a future without Jim Crow, they were not going to ignite the fires of dissent.
The day after Rosa Parks refused to move from her seat in the front of the bus, Ralph Abernathy talked King into accepting the leadership of the Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA). But King accepted only after being reassured that the boycott would be over in a day. As president of the MIA, King made clear in his first list of demands, which were presented to National City Buslines, that the protest was not about challenging segregation. The NAACP found his demands so weak that they refused to endorse his list.
At that time, King was no fan of nonviolence either. Glenn Smiley, a white staff member visiting Montgomery with the Fellowship of Reconciliation, claimed to have discovered âan arsenalâ in his parsonage.1 âWhen I was in graduate school,â King had said, âI thought the only way we could solve our problem . . . was an armed revolt.â2
By the end of the second month of the boycott, King had fallen into despair about his leadership and the direction of the boycott. On a gloomy day in January 1956, fearing that he was a complete failure, King offered his resignation as the president of the MIA. It was not accepted, but Kingâs doubts about his own abilities as a pastor and organizer remained real and unabated.
Later in that month, King returned home to his parsonage around midnight after a long day of organizational meetings. His wife and young daughter were already in bed, and King was eager to join them. But a threatening callâthe kind of call he was getting as many as thirty to forty times a dayâinterrupted his attempt to get some much-needed rest. When he tried to go back to bed, for some reason he could not shake the menacing voice that kept repeating the hateful words in his head.
King got up, made a pot of coffee and sat down at his kitchen table. With his head buried in his hands, he cried out to God. There in his kitchen in the middle of the night, when he had by his own account come to the end of his strength, King met the living Christ in an experience that would carry him through the remainder of his life. âI heard the voice of Jesus saying still to fight on,â King later recalled. âHe promised never to leave me, never to leave me alone. No never alone. No never alone. He promised never to leave me, no never alone.â3
In the stillness of the Alabama night, the voice of Jesus proved more convincing than the threatening voice of the anonymous caller. The voice of Jesus gave him the courage to press through the tumultuous year of 1956 to the victorious end of the Montgomery Bus Boycott. More than that, it gave him a vision for ministry that would drive him for the rest of his life.
When the MIA held a weeklong Institute on Nonviolence and Social Change near the end of their boycott, King looked back at their long hard struggle for justice and made clear its ultimate aim. Though a boycott had been necessary to end discrimination in Montgomery, that boycott was not the end. âThe end,â King said, âis reconciliation, the end is redemption, the end is the creation of the beloved community.â4
I begin with this remarkable moment from the early days of Kingâs involvement in the Civil Rights movement because it points us toward the unfinished business of welcoming justice, the theme of this book. King shows us the plot line of the Civil Rights movement. More than that, he points to the very goal of Godâs movement in the world. God gathers us into the family of faith not only for our own sake, but also so that we might welcome justice and build beloved communities for the sake of the world. That is the purpose that drives followers of the risen Christ. It is the movement of the Spirit that began at Pentecost and has continued in faithful communities of discipleship throughout every generation. It is the theological vision that we need desperately to reclaim in our time.
A UNIFYING THEOLOGICAL VISION
For more than twenty years now, I have been writing and researching âlived theology,â exploring the way our ideas about God shape our moral convictions and ideas about community, justice and racial reconciliation. This has not been merely an academic exercise for me.
I grew up in the South in the 1960s. In 1967 my family moved from a sleepy town in south Alabama to Laurel, Mississippi, which had earned a reputation as the epicenter of southern terrorism, home to the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan and their daily installments of misery and violence. My father was a big-hearted son of the Son with his eyes set on denominational prestige, a young preacher at First Baptist Church and cheerfully indifferent to the racial turmoil he was moving his family right into the middle of. The Civil Rights movement, which I observed from various stages of pubescent awkwardness, was our trial by fire.
My dadâs embrace of the reconciling energies of the faith was at first slow and hesitant, though finally it was undeniable. To his congregation of Citizens Councilors and segregationists, he called into question the churchâs âclosed-door policyâ and eventually preached the sermon âAmazing Grace for Every Race.â
In graduate school in the 1980s I was trained in philosophical theology and modern Christian thought. In the early 1990s I found myself teaching at a Jesuit college in Baltimore, writing academic monographs and doing all those things you need to do to get tenure. After finishing a book in 1994 on German theologian and Christian martyr Dietrich Bonhoeffer, I was surprised to discover that my thoughts and dreams, and increasingly my journals and notebooks, were filled with memories of my childhood in the Deep South. I had planned to write a book on the doctrine of the Trinity but was having trouble concentrating on this marvelous sacred mystery.
Though my childhood had been very intense and eventful, the South had changed. I had not thought a whole lot about those years while I was in college or graduate school, but now I could think of nothing else. I became suddenly haunted by the memories of those years. Long forgotten fears became once again vivid and alive; memories burst into consciousness like floodwaters.
So in the summer of 1994âthirty years after Freedom Summer of 1964, when students went to the South to help with voter registration for disenfranchised African AmericansâI got in my Honda wagon one morning and headed south, with not much more than a full tank of gas, a microcassette recorder and a credit card. This veering off of the straight and narrow road of my academic training changed my life, and it gently invited me into a different kind of theological education.
I was taught to listen more closely to voices outside the academic guild, to engage the subject with humility but also with courage, to be charitable but not to use a false sense of charity as an excuse for risking the concrete word. I learned that theology needs a place.
The experience also brought home to me, in a particularly intense way, the questions Why am I a scholar? and Who am I serving? âYou gotta serve somebody, right?â St. Bob sang. Only my professional colleagues? Or a wider audience of men and women who seek the flourishing of human community, who seek justice and practice mercy, who serve the poor?
Once in an interview, a kindly minister who had been recalling his years as a staff member of the National Council of Churches and his role in the 1965 March on Selma, paused and said, âYou know, your generation is a bunch of wimps.â The least I could doâbeing a wimp and allâwas to ask a few hard questions about my own vocation as a scholar and teacher and somehow try to make the connection back to life.
I was able to see too how the Civil Rights movement that took place in the 1950s and 1960s not only changed unjust laws but also brought about a spiritual awakening, and I am further convinced that this story teaches us even today important lessons about what Dr. Perkins called a holistic faith, about the renewal of the churchâs mission to take part in the healing of our broken and violent and blistered world. The Civil Rights movement teaches us that faith is authentic when it stays close to the ground. And it reminds us of faithâs essential affirmations: showing hospitality to strangers and outcasts; affirming the dignity of created life; reclaiming the ideals of love, honesty and truth; embracing the preferential option of nonviolence; and practicing justice and mercy.
Until 1964 the Civil Rights movement in the South was unified and sustained by a vision of âbeloved community.â Kingâs speech at the end of the Montgomery Bus Boycott offers us a key to understanding the spirit of the movement. For many people, the movement moved on, served its basic purposes or collapsed in chaos. But for those who understand civil rights to be part of Godâs larger movement in the world, the movement continues. This book is about the movement that started with Abraham, captivated Americaâs attention for a moment in the 1950s and 1960s and still goes on today in countless forgotten places on the margins of our society. Itâs about the God movement that is embodied in the lives of John and Vera Mae Perkins.
I am delighted to have the opportunity to write this book with John Perkins. In so many ways, he embodies the best of what I have learned about a theology that participates in Godâs peaceable movement in the world. Stories of people like John and Vera Mae offer a wonderful and altogether persuasive response to those who say that Christianity is irrelevant or even harmful to society. We see in their richly lived theology that authentic faith not only heightens our perception of the world; it also provides the resources, the disciplines and the gifts we need to keep our hands to the plow.
My secularist colleagues in the academy are not very convincing on the question of why we ought to love the broken and the outcast and build beloved community. It is all well and good for the brilliant and often helpful theorist Anthony Appiah to advise us to âlive with fractured identities; engage in identityâs play . . . recognize contingency, and above all practice irony.â5 But what might it mean to settle down after âidentityâs playâ has run its course and build community among the hopeless and excluded in places where irony is a condescending shrug?
It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzscheâs The Antichrist or Derridaâs Dissemination and been inspired to open a soup kitchen. It would be wonderful if one did, because the work of justice and mercy needs the energies and talents of compassionate people, believer(s) or not. The Christian should welcome all men and women to kingdom work with a gracious and open heart. And, of course, many people who are not Christians have dedicated time and energy to the pursuit of social justice, from working in soup kitchens to marching for peaceâand who knows, maybe even some Nietzscheans and deconstructionists have as well.
Still, my research has shown me that only as long as the Civil Rights movement remained anchored in the churchâin the energies, convictions and images of the biblical narrative and the worshiping communityâdid the movement have a vision. The work of organizing and building communities in distressed and excluded places was about celebrating the common grace of women and men, black and white, the privileged and the poor, who found themselves together, miraculously, in the South, working in common cause for a more just and human social order. To the extent that the Civil Rights movement lost this vision, it lost its way. But where the vision was sustainedâin the hundreds of Christian community development ministries inspired by John and Vera Mae Perkins, among other often overlooked placesâGodâs movement was nourished and flourishes still. Though frequently forgotten by historians and policymakers, Godâs movement is the most powerful source of social change in our society.
When you listen to movement veterans tell their stories, you often hear testimonials that have their home in the church. So, as I see it, whatâs lost when you strip away the religious conviction is appreciation of those very sources that energize and sustain compassionâand that continue to inspire redemptive action in the world.
Visit a hospitality house, a tutorial program for low-income children, an AIDS clinic, a hunger relief agency, a Habitat for Humanity site, an administrative building where a student group is sitting in support of a living wage for university workersâyou will find there people who are moved to act for others, who live passionately into the depths and breadth of the worldâs concrete needs because they see a light shining in the darkness; who believe that transcendence empowers rather than diminishes the love o...