1
The legal and policy framework
At a glance this chapter covers:
⢠a brief overview of No Secrets, the guidance in this area prior to the Care Act 2014
⢠the National Framework for Safeguarding Adults
⢠discussion of the No Secrets Review
⢠the safeguarding provisions of the Care Act 2014
⢠Care and Support Statutory Guidance
⢠multi-disciplinary working
⢠communication and sharing information
This chapter focuses on the Care Act 2014, the key piece of civil legislation that now provides the legal framework for professionals working in adult safeguarding, and its Statutory Guidance. The demands of the legislation are great given the complexity of investigations into adult abuse. Penhale and Parker usefully summarize some of the challenges faced by those investigating adult abuse:
The sensitive nature of the issues involved; matters of capacity, consent, confidentiality and autonomy; continuing challenges presented in the search for effective interdisciplinary working; the absence of a reliable research base on which to sustain practice; the absence of close and effective collaboration linking different policy initiatives such as the tensions that exist between the welfare, legislative and regulatory models of protection.
Penhale and Parker, 2007:14
The chapter begins with consideration of the key guidance on adult safeguarding before the Care Act 2014 came in to force, No Secrets, (DH, 2000b). The chapter then goes on to consider key messages from its review, as well as a comprehensive overview of the adult safeguarding mechanisms now incumbent on local authorities under the Care Act 2014.
No Secrets: guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse
No Secrets was published in 2000 (DH, 2000b). Equivalent guidance existed in Wales entitled In Safe Hands: Implementing Adult Protection Procedures in Wales (National Assembly for Wales, 2000).
At the outset it is important to recognize the status of No Secrets. No Secrets was issued under s. 7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970. The significance of s. 7 guidance was explained by Sedley J in R v London Borough of Islington ex parte Rixon [1997]:
Parliament in enacting section 7(1) did not intend local authorities to whom ministerial guidance was given to be free, having considered it, to take it or leave it ⦠in my view parliament by s. 7(1) has required local authorities to follow the path charted by the Secretary of Stateās guidance, with liberty to deviate from it where the local authority judges on admissible grounds that there is good reason to do so, but without freedom to take a substantially different course.
R v London Borough of Islington ex parte Rixon [1997] [71]
Unusually for s. 7 guidance, No Secrets did not specifically attach to a particular statute. Munby LJ remarked on the negative effect of such a position:
There is the remarkable fact that the formal safeguarding agenda in relation to vulnerable adults rests entirely upon Ministerial guidance and otherwise lacks any statutory basis ā a state of affairs that, unsurprisingly, can leave local authorities uncertain as to their function and responsibilities in this vital area. (Munby, 2011: 34)
This criticism is also one that appeared in the review of No Secrets, and the Law Commissionās consultation into reforms of adult social care:
The existing legal framework for adult protection is āneither systematic nor coordinated, reflecting the sporadic development of safeguarding policy over the last 25 years. Unlike in Scotland, there is no single or coherent statutory framework for adult protection in England and Wales. Instead it must be discerned through reference to a wide range of law ... (Law Commission, 2011a: para 9.1)
National Framework for Safeguarding Adults
In 2005, ADSS published Safeguarding Adults: A National Framework of Standards for Good Practice and Outcomes in Adult Protection Work (the National Framework for Safeguarding Adults). The framework comprises 11 standards for good practice in safeguarding adults. This document saw the formal introduction of the term āsafeguardingā in an adult context, in preference to vulnerable adult and adult protection, explaining further:
This phrase means all work which enables an adult āwho is or may be eligible for community care servicesā to retain independence, wellbeing and choice and to access their human right to live a life that is free from abuse and neglect. This definition specifically includes those people who are assessed as being able to purchase all or part of their community care services, as well as those who are eligible for community care services but whose need ā in relation to safeguarding ā is for access to mainstream services such as the police.
ADSS, 2005:5
It also made connections with the MCA 2005 and recognized that principles in that Act would have an application in and inform safeguarding cases, including, importantly, the principles that adults with capacity can make āunwiseā decisions, and any decisions taken on behalf of an adult who lacked capacity had to be in their ābest interestsā and the least intrusive option. This guidance has now been superseded by the Care Act 2014 and its Statutory Guidance; however, the standards set down in this guidance were indicative of the principles that now underpin adult safeguarding.
The standards were:
Standard 1 Each local authority has established a multi-agency partnership to lead āSafeguarding Adultsā work.
Standard 2 Accountability for and ownership of āSafeguarding Adultsā work is recognised by each partner organisationās executive body.
Standard 3 The āSafeguarding Adultsā policy includes a clear statement of every personās right to live a life free from abuse and neglect, and this message is actively promoted to the public by the Local Strategic Partnership, the āSafeguarding Adultsā partnership, and its member organisations.
Standard 4 Each partner agency has a clear, well-publicised policy of Zero-Tolerance of abuse within the organisation.
Standard 5 The āSafeguarding Adultsā partnership oversees a multiagency workforce development/training sub-group. The partnership has a workforce development/training strategy and ensures that it is appropriately resourced.
Standard 6 All citizens can access information about how to gain safety from abuse and violence, including information about the local āSafeguarding Adultsā procedures.
Standard 7 There is a local multi-agency āSafeguarding Adultsā policy and procedure describing the framework for responding to all adults āwho is or may be eligible for community care servicesā and who may be at risk of abuse or neglect. [original emphasis]
Standard 8 Each partner agency has a set of internal guidelines, consistent with the local multi-agency āSafeguarding Adultsā policy and procedures, which set out the responsibilities of all workers to operate within it.
Standard 9 The multi-agency āSafeguarding Adultsā procedures detail the following stages: Alert, Referral, Decision, Safeguarding Assessment Strategy, Safeguarding Assessment, Safeguarding Plan, Review, Recording and Monitoring.
Standard 10 The safeguarding procedures are accessible to all adults covered by the policy.
Standard 11 The partnership explicitly includes service users as key partners in all aspects of the work. This includes build-ing service-user participation into its: membership; monitoring, development and implementation of its work; training strategy; and planning and implementation of their individual safeguarding assessment and plans.
ADSS, 2005:3
Replacing No Secrets
The review of No Secrets was prompted by a number of factors. Since 2000 there had been major changes in the policy environment (such as the ADSS National Framework for Safeguarding Adults, discussed above), including the commitment to personalization. Weaknesses in the implementation of No Secrets had been identified, including inconsistent implementation across the country. A third prompt was the need to examine the case for legislative change given the identified lack of legal provisions compared to that in existence for safeguarding children.
Messages that emerged from the consultation supported revision of No Secrets and some statutory changes. A key emphasis of responses was the need to hear the voice of vulnerable people. That voice is evident in the four key messages identified in the document, namely: safeguarding requires empowerment ā hearing the victimās voice; empowerment is everybodyās business, but safeguarding decisions are not; safeguarding adults is not like child protection ā there are differences; and participation/representation of people who lack capacity is also important (DH, 2008a).
Specific questions focused on the need for statutory reform. A significant proportion of respondents, 68 pe...