In this chapter we will explore:
- philosophies of teaching;
- types of knowledge;
- values, beliefs and attitudes;
- skills for teaching.
Our motivations and values have a great influence on how we develop as teachers and establishing these at the outset will help you to plan your professional progress effectively. Although you have already taken the decision to pursue a teaching career, it is important to explore the reasons behind this; in this chapter we will consider the motivations, philosophies and values that underpin these choices.
Why teach?
Before you embark on your journey think about the events which brought you to this point. Perhaps it was your love of learning? A desire to share your knowledge with others? Maybe you were inspired by one of your own teachers? Having a clear view of the underpinning reasons which fuelled your motivation will help to establish your base philosophy in relation to the role, as well as highlight your core values, both of which are important to remember when you come across challenges in your career.
Reflection
Imagine you are at your first job interview and are asked the question ‘Why did you want to become a teacher?’ What would you say? Without spending too much time deliberating (much as would be the case in an interview), jot down your initial thoughts and then come back to these when you have finished reading the chapter.
Your initial answers will tell you something about your motivation which, in turn, will influence the sort of teacher you become.
Research by (Chiong et al., 2017) explored the main things which draw people to the teaching profession and concluded that these were largely based on intrinsic (interest in subject or working with young people), extrinsic (pay, holidays etc.) or altruistic motivations, such as making a difference to society. For many teachers and trainees, the desire to do something they found satisfying, which was also socially meaningful, was a big draw. For participants in the research, the top five reasons for choosing teaching as a career were:
Figure 1.1 Top five reasons for choosing teaching as a career
Similar motivations can be seen in the Guardian’s teacher network (Guardian, 2020) which also adds factors such as the variety in the job and that teaching is fun! An important consideration in all of this is longevity. Training new teachers is an essential role for continued educational development, but we also need to ensure that we keep those long-serving teachers who have a wealth of experience to share. So, before you start on your teacher training journey, it is also worth considering some of the main reasons why teachers leave or stay in teaching. Reasons for leaving include:
- heavy workloads;
- constant changes;
- challenging student behaviour;
- Ofsted;
- negative image in press.
(Guardian, 2020)
All of this is may well resonate with your own reasons for choosing a career in teaching – it is also important to establish why people stay in teaching. In Chiong et al.’s study the main reasons cited were those which could be considered altruistic, such as making a difference and helping others. It is worth remembering this at times when the job seems difficult!
At this stage in your career it is also useful to think about your overall philosophy in relation to education and what this might mean in terms of your values about teaching and learning.
Some philosophies of education
There are a number of philosophies relating to education which provide us with a starting point in thinking about our views of the purpose of teaching and education overall. These are outlined below to prompt initial thinking about your own philosophies which in turn may lead to a greater understanding of your values in relation to education.
Perennialism
Perennialism presents a very determined view of education and sees it as a vehicle for presenting fixed ‘truths’. In this sense education institutions would exist simply to teach the commonly accepted ‘truths’ and may do so through a series of structured lessons. It is easy to imagine the advantages of having such certainties in life, particularly in terms of structuring teaching and subsequently learning, against pre-determined expectations; likewise it is not difficult to imagine the limitations of this approach. The name itself suggests a degree of conformity and stagnation – like the perennial plant, the conditions in which it will grow remain fixed, as does the plant itself, never having an opportunity to blossom in a way which differs to its predecessors.
Idealism
Idealism is based on the view that reality is individually constructed and that ideas are the only ‘true reality’ as well as the only thing worth knowing. Plato is considered the ‘father’ of idealism; he described a utopian society in which the purpose of education was to bring latent ideas to consciousness and discover and develop each individual’s abilities. From a teacher’s perspective this would mean a focus on handling ideas through discussion and Socratic dialogue (a method of teaching based on questioning to clarify knowledge). By using these methods, a teacher is eliciting information, rather than providing it and becomes a guide as opposed to a sage. While at first glance this might seem very appealing, the reality of a large group of students all having individually constructed realities can be overwhelming.
Realism
Realism is a philosophy based on the belief in the world ‘as it is’. In this sense, ‘reality’ would be based on observations and the scrutiny of observable data. A curriculum based on the principles of this philosophy would emphasise the physical world (in particular disciplines such as science and mathematics) in order to study structure and form and develop rational thinking. The teacher’s role in this case would be to organise and present content systematically and use methods which encouraged the mastery of facts and basic skills. As with perennialism this has the advantage of being an organised, systematic approach to teaching, although may potentially stifle creativity by limiting the scope of teaching and learning to that which was observable and considered factual.
Pragmatism
For pragmatists things are only considered ‘real’ if they are experienced or observed. From this perspective there is no absolute because things are always changing so the aim is not to search for ‘truth’ so much as truth in what works. John Dewey applied this philosophy in his progressive approaches based on the premise that learners must adapt to each other and to their environment; therefore learning would take into account the social experience, the context, place and time. A pragmatist approach to teaching would have a focus on methods which involved hands-on problem-solving, experimentation and working in collaboration.
Existentialism
Existentialism is based on the belief that we all have a personal interpretation of the world and this is defined at an individual level. In this sense individuals are defined by the choices they make and not driven by others’ views. For Sartre the existential moment comes when a young person realises for the first time that choice is theirs and they are responsible for themselves so that their question becomes ‘Who am I and what should I do?’ In relation to education, an existentialist classroom would be one in which choice is paramount and where the teacher emphasises that answers come from within individuals rather than an outside authority. This freedom can also extend to what and how to learn, something which is embedded in a problem-based learning approach. Lessons structured in this way use ‘problems’ (often in the form of case studies) as triggers for investigation, collaboration and self-directed learning which takes pl...