Increasing Small Arms Lethality In Afghanistan: Taking Back The Infantry Half-Kilometer

Major Thomas P. Ehrhart

• Publisher: Tannenberg Publishing
• Year: 2015
• eBook ISBN: 9781786253927
• Topic: History
• Subtopic: Military & Maritime History
• Index: History

Operations in Afghanistan frequently require United States ground forces to engage and destroy the enemy at ranges beyond 300 meters. These operations occur in rugged terrain and in situations where traditional supporting fires are limited due to range or risk of collateral damage. With these limitations, the infantry in Afghanistan require a precise, lethal fire capability that exists only in a properly trained and equipped infantryman. While the infantryman is ideally suited for combat in Afghanistan, his current weapons, doctrine, and marksmanship training do not provide a precise, lethal fire capability to 500 meters and are therefore inappropriate.Comments from returning non-commissioned officers and officers reveal that about fifty percent of engagements occur past 300 meters. The enemy tactics are to engage United States forces from high ground with medium and heavy weapons, often including mortars, knowing that we are restricted by our equipment limitations and the inability of our overburdened soldiers to maneuver at elevations exceeding 6000 feet. Current equipment, training, and doctrine are optimized for engagements under 300 meters and on level terrainThere are several ways to extend the lethality of the infantry. A more effective 5.56-mm bullet can be designed which provides enhanced terminal performance out to 500 meters. A better option to increase incapacitation is to adopt a larger caliber cartridge, which will function using components of the M16/M4. The 2006 study by the Joint Service Wound Ballistics-Integrated Product Team discovered that the ideal caliber seems to be between 6.5 and 7-mm. This was also the general conclusion of all military ballistics studies since the end of World War I.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

“10th Mountain Division History.” http://www.mscd.edu/history/camphale/tmd_001.html (accessed September 10, 2009).

Advanced Leader Course (BNCOC). https://www.benning.army.mil/ncoa/BNCOC/phase1.pdf (accessed September 13, 2009).

Anderson, Gary. “Civilian Marksmanship Program.” Army SDM instructor Program Grows with CMP support. January 1, 2006. http://www.odcmp.org/0106/default.asp?page=SDM (accessed February 9, 2009).

Bacevich, A. J. The Pentomic Era: The U.S. Army between Korea and Vietnam. Washington: National Defense University Press, 1986.

Bellavia, David and Brunning, John. House to house: an epic memoir of war. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 2007.

Binter, Eric. Extractor Spring Design for the M4 Carbine. Finding, Picatinny Arsenal: Medium & Small Caliber Weapons Group, Armaments Engineering & Technology Center, 2006.

Blish, Freddie. “Battlesight Zero—Who has it right?” S.W.A.T, October 1, 2008: 62-67.

“Brownells.” Picatinny Rails, Weaver rails, what’s the difference. http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/lid=10724/guntechdetail/Picatinny_Rails__Weaver_Rails__What_s_The_Difference_ (accessed 09 10, 2009).

C17 Globemaster III. http://www.globemaster.de/c-17/ (accessed September 11, 2009).

Clark, Rodney A, and Martha B. Myers. A Description of Combat Rifle Squads on the Korean MLR During the Winter of 1952-53. Technical Report, Fort Ord: The George Washington University Human Resources Research Office, 1954.

Clements, D. Robert. “The Designated Marksman Equation.” Infantry, 2008: 47-50.

Collins, Edward J, MAJ. “TRAINFIRE II.” Infantry, January-March, 1959: 21-25.

Cox, Mathew. “Ammo under fire—Temperature issues arise for lead-free slug.” Army Times. Springfield: Army Times publishing company, August 10, 2009.

______. “Army times.” Weapons training and qualification overhauled. May 5, 208. http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/05/army_marksmanship_050408w/ (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” New M16 Aims for more bang per bullet. December 20, 2004. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” Setting sights on shots gone astray—Simulator lets trainers hone in on shooting flaws. April 4, 2005. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” New rifle instruction reflects combat reality—Recruits shoot in bulky gear, from different positions. December 5, 2005. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 209).

______. “Newsbank.” Short-term training for long-range shooters—Instructors bring marksmanship course to your post before deployment. November 27, 2006. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” New manual lets leaders change rifle qualifications to match mission. November 27, 2006. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” Marksmanship badges took a while to catch on. March 17, 2008. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” Test marks the spot. May 5, 2008. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” At close range—New marksmanship training prepares soldiers for war-zone realities. August 13, 2007. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

______. “Newsbank.” Going the distance—New course targets deadlier aim for squad’s marksmen. December 20, 2004. http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/infoweb (accessed February 9, 2009).

Cutshaw, Charlie. The New World of Russian Small Arms & Ammo. Boulder: Paladin Press, 1998.

Dean, Glenn and Lafontaine, David. “Small Caliber Lethality: 5.56mm Performance in Close Quarters Battle.” Infantry, September-October 2006: 26-32.

Defense Technical Information Center. The evolution of the armored infantry rifle squad. Technical Report, Alexandria: Defense Logistics Agency, 1965.

Description and rules for the management of the United States Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1917. Washington: Government printing office, 1917.

Ellison, Isaac William IV. Current inadequacy of small arms training for all military occupational specialties in the conventional army. Monograph, Fort Leavenworth: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 2005.

English, John A. and Gudmundson, Bruce. On Infantry. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1994.

Ezell, Edward Clinton. The Great Rifle Controversy—Search for the Ultimate Infantry Weapon from World War II Through Vietnam and Beyond. Harrisburg: Stackpole Books, 1984.

Fackler, Martin L. “Wounding Patterns of Military Rifle Bullets.” International Defense Review, 1989: 59-64.

Fackler, Martin L, M. D., M.A. John S. Surinchak, B.S. John A. Malinowski, and Robert E. Bowen. “Bullet Fragmentation: A Major Cause of Tissue Disruption.” JTrauma, 1984: 35-39.

Feickert, Andrew. The Army’s M4 Carbine...

Table of contents

• Title page
• TABLE OF CONTENTS
• ABSTRACT
• INTRODUCTION
• CAPABILITY OF THE INFANTRY-1917-2003
• TAKING BACK THE INFANTRY HALF-KILOMETER
• CONCLUSION
• APPENDIX A-1949 RIFLE QUALIFICATION
• APPENDIX B-MEU (SOC) M4 QUALIFICATION COURSE
• BIBLIOGRAPHY