SECTION ONE
ALL THE READING WE DONâT REMEMBER
Reading for Formation
NOT LONG AGO I was sitting with a group of young pastors at a local coffee shop when one of the pastors asked our group what year the Korean War began.
Upon his question, a few of us at the table began hazarding educated guesses, while others pulled out their cell phones and began searching for the answer.
One of the ministers, holding up his phone, called out, â1950.â
âYes,â another minister said, nodding to her own phone. âBegan in June of 1950 with skirmishes along the border.â
Another minister, himself reading the same Wikipedia entry, pointed out that China and the Soviet Union had backed North Korea during the war while the United States had backed South Korea.
From there, a few more tidbits of trivia were read, and the conversation was just about to draw to a close, when another minister among us, a pastor named Greg, suddenly said, âOne thing that gets lost in conversations about the Korean War is the way that Koreaâs occupation by Japanâwhich was over by the time of the Korean Warâfueled the antagonism between the North and the South and continued to haunt both North and South Koreans long after the Japanese were gone.â
âThe Japanese?â one of the ministers asked.
âYes,â Greg replied. âThe Japanese occupied Korea for several decades in the early twentieth centuryâuntil the Allied forces pushed them out at the end of World War II.â
âI donât think I ever knew that,â one of the ministers said.
Nodding, Greg added, âThe psychological toll was enormous. Throughout the Korean War and long afterâin some cases, even still todayâindividual Koreans were left grappling with scars left by the Japanese occupation.â
Greg went on to say more and then, wrapping up, added that, like the rest of us, he had not known the exact date the war had begun.
âHow do you know all of this other stuff, though?â one of the ministers asked.
Greg shrugged and said, âWho knows. Iâm not sure exactly. I picked up some of it from reading a novel called Pachinko last year that was a finalist for the National Book Award. It followed a Korean family through four generations and brought a lot about that periodâand that regionâto life for me.â
And that was the end of the conversation.
When Greg explained how he had come aboutâand had been enriched byâthe things heâd read in that novel, it struck me that here was a perfect example of the kind of reader I myself aspire to be, and the kind of reader this book will encourage you to be: not a pastor who reads simply in search of information, but rather a pastor-reader.
The difference is all the difference in the world, and this first section further reveals the important distinction.
1
On Formation
IN THE OPENING CHAPTER of C. S. Lewisâs memoir Surprised by Joy, Lewis tells a story about a moment from his boyhood when he came upon a biscuit tin filled with flowers recently picked by his brother, Warnie. Years later, Lewis writes, the memory of that biscuit tin came back to him, and with the memory came a distinct sense of longing. Lewis goes on to call this sense of longing âjoy,â and he uses this simple image to set up the theme that will preoccupy the rest of his memoir. He then writes: âThe reader who finds [this story] of no interest need read this book no further, for in a sense the central story ⌠is about nothing else.â1
I open by recalling these words because, should the story I am about to tell turn out to be of no interest, there may be no need to read this book any further, either. For, as Lewis explains of his story, so too does the story I am about to tellâsimple and unexciting as it isâcontain and embody the central premise of this entire book.
But in order to tell this story, I need to first tell another.
Shortly after I started seminary, I was asked by a local church to oversee a day-project for Habitat for Humanity. The project took place on a Saturday, and across the street from where we were working stood a simple, redbrick church. That morning, while pausing for a short break, I happened to see a young manâperhaps forty years oldâexit the front door of a small house nearby. This young man had a Bible in his hand, and I watched him walk across the churchyard, unlock the churchâs front door, and then disappear inside. It was obvious to me that this young man was the churchâs pastor, and that the house from which he had just come was the churchâs parsonage.
This sceneâthe peacefulness of the moment, the simple elegance of the church building, the thought of the pastor praying and preparing in Saturday silenceâseemed quite lovely to me. And I remember thinking, âThat seems like a nice life.â
Nothing more, nothing lessâjust: âThat seems like a nice life.â
Minutes later I was back to work. Soon enough, afternoon had come. And with our work now complete, we leftâand I never saw that Habitat house or that little church again. But the image of the pastor walking from his house to his church stuck with me. And in the fifteen years since, I have oftenâwithout warningâfound myself remembering it. And thatâs the end of the story.
But to understand why I tell you that story, you must understand this: At the time this happened, not only did I have little to no familiarity with small, traditional churches like the one in question but I had just spent the last half decade traveling the country as a guest speaker at various megachurches, my sense of identity predicated almost entirely on how big and how busy I could become. Thus, my conception of a âgood churchâ at the time looked nothing like this one, and my conception of a âgood lifeâ looked nothing like the one this young pastor was living.
I would soon, of course, go on to live a similar lifeâand I donât doubt that my decision to do so was in some small way influenced by the impression this moment made on meâbut thatâs not the point of the story.
The point of the story is to tell you about how I, fifteen years later, suddenly recognized why this moment had made such an impression on me. And to explain that, I now have to tell you another storyâthe one that I say encapsulates everything that is to follow.
For my birthday several years ago, some friends brought me a collection of their favorite books, and among those books was Marilynne Robinsonâs Gilead. Unbeknownst to them, Gilead also happens to be one of my favorites: one that I have read several times and often give as a gift to others. I thanked them for the books, put them on a shelf at home, and promptly forgot all about this new copy of Gilead.
Months later, though, while browsing my shelves for a different book, I came across the copy they had given me, and I decided to pull it down. My intention was not to read the whole thing but simply to reenjoy a few key passages. But after reading one page I felt compelled to read a second; and then, after that, a third; and then, before I knew it, I was set on rereading the entire thing.
Upon reflection, it had been nearly eight years since I had last read the book, and, astonishingly, over fifteen years since I had read it for the first time. And as I got about a quarter of the way into the storyâthe story of an aging minister reflecting on his life and ministryâI came across this passage, and it stopped me cold: âItâs a plain old church ⌠but I used to walk over before sunrise just to sit there and watch the light come in. I felt much at peace those mornings, praying.â
And then, twenty pages later, I read this: âPerhaps that is the one thing I wish to tell you. Sometimes the visionary aspect of any particular day comes to you in the memory of it, or it opens to you over time.â
And suddenly, I realized with absolute certainty something that had escaped me for fifteen years, something that time was only now âopeningâ to me: the reconfiguring of my lifeâthe impetus behind my becoming the kind of pastor I had become and the kind of man that I now amâhad begun through spending time in the fictional town of Gilead, Iowa, and through observing the fictional character of John Ames, but I had never even realized it. In other words, through that novel, a transformation had begun in me at such a deep level, and in such an unassuming way, that I didnât even know it was happening.
And here is the crucial point of the story: despite how readily I had cited the book as a favorite, and despite how many copies of it I had given away to others, never once had it occurred to me that it had played such a pivotal role in shaping who I had become.
But it had.
Had I not read Gilead two years before that Habitat build, and had the world Robinson created not appealed so deeply to me, there is no chance that, in seeing that young minister walk from his house to his church that day, I would have thought, âThat seems like a nice life.â Without Gilead, the internal conditions necessary for that visceral response would simply not have been possible.
So thereâs the story. And as I said in the beginning, if it does not resonate with you, or if it fails to be sufficiently compelling, the rest of this book may prove to be unhelpful as well. But before giving up on me, allow me to tell you one other story, this one about why I was even at that Habitat build to begin with.
You see, six months earlier Iâd been a high school English teacher with no discernible plans of going to seminary. Still deeply desirous of fame and still deeply driven by personal ambition, I had already crashed and burned as an aspiring actor and, more recently, had published a book that, depending on oneâs philosophy, may or may not have made a sound as it fell out of print.
I was still receiving invitations from churches to appear as a âguest speaker,â but those were drying up, and I was now uncertain not only of what I wanted to do but of who I wanted to be, and I had fallen into teaching by accident. A friend, knowing I needed a steadier job and knowing I had a degree in literature, had connected me with a local high school in need of an English teacher.
When I accepted the job, I told myself that it would be a stopgap thing, something to do while I figured out what was next. But I quickly found that I loved teachingâloved it so much that there were days when I would imagine myself doing it for thirty more years. Unfortunately, there were also days when I couldnât imagine myself doing it for thirty more minutes.
I went back and forth like that for two years, vacillating between a desire to make a career out of teaching and a desire to make a break for the door. All the while I struggled to understand the pendulous nature of what was happening; I struggled to see how I could be so enthusiastic about something one minute and so disenchanted with it the next.
But then, through this experience, I underwent the first stirrings of a âcallâ to ministryâand it took place on account of a Leo Tolstoy short story.
The story is called âThe Long Exile,â and, in assigning it, I assumed that my students would be only marginally interested. I was wrong. Because, as the story ended, my students were irate. The story had violated their basic belief in justice, and they werenât going to suffer it quietly.
I was stunned. We had read so many great stories together that year, yet neverânot onceâhad my students reacted to a story the way they reacted to this one...