Rilke in Paris
by Maurice Betz
Ah, The achievement of a small moon!
Days where around us all is clear, barely an outline in the luminous air and yet distinct. Even the nearest things have a distant tone, shrink back, show only from a distance, are not exposed; and all that draws on this expanse of distance â the river, the bridges, the long roads and the squares which expend themselves â hold that distance within them, and are painted there as if on silk. Who can say what a bright green motorcar on Pont Neuf might be, or this vivid red rushing forth, or even simply that poster, on the wall adjoining a cluster of pearl-grey buildings. All is simplified, restored to a few planes, sharp and clear, as a face in a portrait by Manet. Nothing is insignificant or without relevance. The bouquinistes on the quais open their boxes, and the yellow freshness or weariness of the books, the brown violet of the bindings, the more sovereign green of an album, all harmonise, count, take part in the whole and converge in consummate perfectionâŠ
From The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge (1910)
The âFrench Componentâ In Rilkeâs Work
The case of Rainer Maria Rilke is rather extraordinary: a Germanic poet in the deepest sense, who represents, in both its most intense and subtle form, a singular branch of German romanticism, at the point where he encounters the final ripening of the Slavic spiritual universe and discovers his own true identity through his relationship with a French city.
In Paris, this German poet discovered not only a temporary home and more or less enduring friendships, but also an inner inspiration, which guided him towards the secret configuration of his entire being. For some twelve years he returned almost year on year, both contented and disappointed to encounter there ever renewed ecstasies and anxieties, and a virtually eternal landscape. This city lent him the framework and themes of a work through which he felt able to express himself to the very limits of the inexpressible, to the threshold of reflecting on and accepting death with a calm heart, following The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge, in which he was conscious of having marshalled the entire resolve of his existence. He gave himself so utterly to this work that after its completion he remained for many years stricken by sterility. For Rilke, Paris had been much more than Venice for Byron, or Toledo for BarrĂšs: a revelation of the most profound possibilities, the âdividing line of his inward watersâ and the touchstone of his art. He declared on several occasions, with distinct emotion, what a debt he owed to this âincomparable city which represents a world in my development and memoryâ and whose âimmense and generous hospitalityâ allowed him to bring into the light those feelings and thoughts which were tentatively seeking their form.
However important the âFrench componentâ in Rilkeâs work, it did not manage to govern alone the deeper reaches of his being. This inveterate traveller criss-crossing the very soul and landscape of Europe, nourished himself on the nectar of all latitudes, without his fundamental architecture being altered. From one country to the next, he ploughed his unique furrow, scoring deep, sometimes losing himself in the most unfathomable subterranean labyrinths, but everywhere searching only that he might ultimately emerge into authentic existence.
In these scenic variations for the poet, one observes certain cycles. Some are of major significance: principally the Russian and French ones. The Danish and Spanish cycles allowed Rilke, on the one hand, access to the fantastic and the intimate acquaintanceship of ghosts, and, on the other, to that wide expanse of sky inhabited by Grecoâs supernatural angels, which haunt the Elegies and sustain the disembodied poetry. The Italian and Valaisan cycles frame these primary experiences: Florence and Venice are places of residence for the youthful poet who harmonises the first variegations of his impressionist palette, while towards the close of his life, the Valais afforded, following the deliverance which was the achievement of the Duino Elegies, the relaxation and relief enjoyed by a genial rustic poet.
In terms of foreign experiences, Rilkeâs discovery of Paris follows directly on from his encounter with the Slavic world, a religious and mystical phase which found expression in The Book of Hours written between 1899 and1903. France presented Rilke with a âhuman landscapeâ, which was mirrored at the same time in the works of her painters, in the lessons and example of her poets, and by that life so naturally expressive which is reflected in the faces of the Parisian street. âIt is ever more difficult for the writer to find in action the exterior equivalent to the soulâs movementsâ he wrote with Ibsen in mind. The landscape of Paris offered one of those equivalents. For Rilke, that revelation would only deepen, until it spread throughout his entire oeuvre.
II
The Discovery of Paris
At the dawn of the century, a young man who had just published his first verses in Germany arrived at a modest hotel in the Latin Quarter. He had blue eyes, his curly hair was brush-like; his manner furtive and he bore the countenance of a dreamer. His high waistcoat and blouse buttoned to the neck lent him the appearance of a seminarian or young priest. A Russian priest more precisely, for his chin was graced with a faint blond beard and he sometimes assumed one of their characteristic smocks with deep folds.
After a journey of several months in Russia, during the course of which he paid a visit to Tolstoy in his residence at Yasnaya Polyana, Rainer Maria Rilke spent a period with a group of North German painters, at Worpswede, and in this Barbizon, set amidst the ponds and heaths of LĂŒneberg, had first heard pronounced the name of Rodin, by a young German woman who had for a time been the student of the great sculptor. This meeting was in many respects decisive, for Rilke began by marrying the young woman, after which, impatient to approach the master to whom he would shortly be pledging his profound admiration in person, Rilke abandoned this newly discovered home and departed for Paris, determined to meet Rodin and better study his work.
In the eyes of this young poet, whom an intimate experience or discovery relating to art bore so effortlessly over all practical and social realities, Rodin was the unique master, without rival. This lyric poet, still permeated by Slavic mysticism and fluidity, experienced a sense of revelation before the powerful blocks of stone on whose surface this manâs sacred hand had the power to summon so many desires, sufferings and passions. And while waiting to be admitted into the court of the sculptor to whom he proposed to dedicate a work, Rilke wrote a series of moving letters to Rodin in which he compared the man to a God and his art to a daily miracle.
But what can Rodin have made of these demonstrations of earnest devotion? The master of Meudon was not insensitive to homages, even excessive ones, in which his virile ingénue assurance regained vigour and energy from the affronts of a turbulent career. Perhaps too, he detected in the enthusiasm of this young German writer, of whose work he would never have any knowledge, the sentiment of some exceptional quality. The fact remains that, after frequent invitations to Rilke to visit his workshops and share his table at Meudon, he would go so far as to offer him the hospitality of one of his chalets and confer on the young poet, like a favour of state, the responsibility of replying to his voluminous foreign correspondence.
This recognition came only after three years of active friendship, following Rilkeâs publications of the projected work. Rilke only remained Rodinâs unpaid secretary for a few months. The master was a despot with the beard of a prophet; he had his moods, his caprices and rages. One of these storms dislodged, if it did not actually break, the friendship between the two men. In the meantime however, Rilke had discovered Paris and learnt French. He was drawn with contemplative obeisance to the forms of French life, to the Parisian landscape, to its writers and artists. To Maurice Martin du Gard, he later confided,
The Louvre, Notre Dame, Chartres Cathedral, the spectacle of the Parisian street, supply him with the material for the new poems he is composing â strong contours, sculptural forms â all under Rodinâs influence. At the BibliothĂšque Nationale he reads one after the other, Froissart, Baudelaire, Flaubert, Francis Jammes⊠He is enamoured by the work of Paul CĂ©zanne, makes the acquaintance of EugĂšne CarriĂšre, Emile Verhaeren, AndrĂ© Gide, The Comtesse de Noailles. In the manner of several other German poets of the nineteenth century, Rilke is subject to the charms of the French language and its forms, and much later he even undertakes to incorporate a part of it into his oeuvre. He speaks with subtle perspicacity of the problems inherent to this language, the difficulties of syntax, the snares of logic, the riches and loopholes of its vocabulary. He translates into German the works of Maurice de GuĂ©rin, AndrĂ© Gide, Paul ValĂ©ry, a few poems of Louise LabĂ©, Baudelaire, Verlaine, MallarmĂ©âŠand towards the end of his life, encouraged by the poet of Charmes, he even ventures to borrow this language, so long familiar to him, to expound in gracious and pastoral poems some of the enigmas of his heart and spirit.
The history of the exterior relationship Rilke enjoyed with France is however not the most crucial. These exchanges, however distant their consequences might be, were situated only at the surface of his life. The most crucial discoveries Rilke owed not so much to his French friendships, as to the fateful chance that led him into a solitary confrontation with the faces and atmospheres of an unknown city, the fundamental problems of life and the most painful mysteries of being.
On 28 August 1902, Rilke arrived at rue Toullier, already discomposed by the premonition of these forthcoming transformations. In a brief note, which, with a kind of coquetry he had prevailed to compose in French â âIn a French,â he would later write, âfor which somewhere there must be a purgatoryâŠâ â he announced his arrival to Clara Rilke.
Even five years later he would remember the strangeness of this first contact with the city and divulge to Clara, as they recalled a memorable birthday, his bewildered impressions: the Gare du Nord, the anxiety of those first moments, the long absinthe spoon which accompanied a glass of coffee, the post office on the Blvd St Michel which no longer exists, the leaves of the chestnut trees, that whole Paris at the close of summer, which he found right from the start âfilled with waiting, promises and necessity, even in its most elementary detailsâ.
The comfort of the little hotel in the Latin Quarter was really quite primitive: in place of electric light, a smoky paraffin lamp. The back of the armchair displayed âan indent in a shade of greasy grey that must conform to every headâ; the stairwell was so dark that Rilke compares his laborious ascensions to Saint Michaelâs combat with the dragon. âAh! how terrible are those nights of the Latin Quarter in those little student hotelsâ, he sighs.
Rilke only stayed at No 11 rue Toullier for five weeks. Towards the end of his stay, he complained that the twelve windows of the house opposite were trained on him like so many inquisitive glances, forcing him to participate, against his will, in too many strangersâ existences. It was in this room however, that he began really to absorb Paris. When, two years later, he started to write The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge, it was from this fleeting but unforgettable abode that the secrets of his imaginary hero would date: