1
Historical Perspectives
1.1 George R. Sims â Eminent Victorian?36
George Robert Sims was born in London in 1847, ten years after Queen Victoriaâs accession to the throne of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and he died there in 1922, twelve years after Victoriaâs grandson had been crowned King George V. Strictly speaking then, George R. Sims lived only two thirds of his life as a Victorian author, although he probably reached the height of his fame in the 1890s and early 1900s following the publication of his Dagonet ballads, pieces of investigative journalism and theatrical successes. Still, adaptations of Simsâs ballads and stories â first for the magic lantern and later the cinema screen â made sure that Dagonet remained a household name well into the 1920s.
By 1839 the term âVictorianâ was used matter-of-factly to refer to that epoch but, as historians Kelly Boyd and Rohan McWilliam point out, after 1901 its use increased to denote and frequently deride a certain mindset:
It meant earnestness, prudery, hypocrisy, overly ornate and elaborate design, bold entrepreneurialism, double standards, snobbery, sentimentality, utilitarianism, imperialism, narrow mindedness, cosy but stifling family life, rote-learning, extreme religiosity, racism, respectability, corporal punishment, hard work and drudgery.37
The adjective âVictorianâ, in turn, âcame to describe a sepia-tinted age that trumpeted high ideals and Christian virtues but presided over an underworld of poverty and prostitutionâ.38 For George R. Sims this was not necessarily a contradiction. As a journalist, he wrote extensively about the metropolitan poor (How the Poor Live, 1883; Horrible London, 1883) and described Londonâs criminal underworld and prostitution schemes in Watches of the Night (1907) and London by Night (1910). As a dramatist, he put the East End onto the stage in his famous, wildly successful play Lights oâ London (1881). Sims also repeatedly appealed to the Christian charity of his readers and regularly asked them to donate to the Referee Childrenâs Dinner Fund and other charitable causes in his weekly column.
The periodization of the Victorian era is approached differently by the two disciplines most relevant to this study. Literary history commonly situates it between the earlier Romantic era and the advent of Modernism around the turn of the 20th century and characterizes it primarily as a period of literary realism and naturalism dominated by the success of the novel form.39 George Simsâs journalistic and theatrical works were certainly influenced by Victorian realism but he also wrote a number of humorous and farcical plays early in his career (Crutch and Toothpick, 1879; Mother-in-Law, 1881; The Member for Slocum, 1881), and ventured into more fantastical and symbolist writing in the 1900s (Mysteries of Modern London, 1905; The Devil in London, 1908).40
Historians disagree on the boundaries of the Victorian period often arguing that it extended beyond the actual dates of Victoriaâs reign (1837â1901). Many include the earlier reform years of the late 1820s and 1830s, others subsume it within a long 19th century that starts around the time of the French Revolution and ends with the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. While historian Colin Matthew claims that, ânobody then or now would include the 1900s as âVictorianââ, others have argued that the societal changes of the Edwardian Age including womenâs suffrage and welfare reforms followed developments of the previous century, âmaking any notion of a decisive break with the past in 1901 questionableâ.41 Historians have questioned many of the widely held assumptions about the Victorian age: The notion that an Industrial Revolution fundamentally transformed English society to form a Victorian age characterized by the rise of the middle class and the prevalence of manufacturing, for example.42 Richard Price has repeatedly argued that instead, a continuity of âbasic structuresâ of society existed from the late 17th to the late 19th century and denied that the notion of Victorian England makes sense.43 This leads Victorianist Martin Hewitt to conclude that, âthe Victorian period has been shaped by a scholarship that has either moulded the terminal dates of Victoriaâs reign to its own ends, or prefaced studies of the period with the apparently obligatory admission that it doesnât really existâ.44 Another tendency of Victorian Studies pointed out by Boyd and McWilliam is that contemporary influences and issues are reflected in the constantly changing approaches towards the Victorians. Thus, the focal point of influential texts in Victorian Studies has shifted from class-based approaches influenced by Marxist theory in the 1950s and 1960s to studies of gender, race and the nation from the 1980s, often based on concepts developed by Michel Foucault.45
1.2 Key Concepts in Victorian Culture
New Media and Poverty
Historian Martin Hewitt has sought to establish a distinct âcultural identityâ of the Victorian period by defining five assemblages, âcompounds of technologies, practices, institutions, knowledges, meanings, values, and ideologiesâ, that allow him to identify âa number of interrelated characteristics of the Victorian as periodâ.46 Hewitt argues that developments at the start of the Victorian period, most notably the construction of the railways with their high-speed views of landscapes and people in the 1830s and the invention of photographic processes in the late 1830s and early 1840s, âgave the Victorians a fresh visual engagement with the worldâ.47 Literary historian Renate Brosch states similarly that Victorians witnessed âan explosion of visuality during which new optical devices, new entertainments, new subjects and techniques in representation were accompanied by enormous visual changes in everyday urban lifeâ.48 Legal reforms and new technologies alike enabled this âexplosion of visualityâ, which encompasses the rapid expansion of exhibition cultures (following the Great Exhibition of 1851), performance cultures (the rise of the music hall and melodrama) and an emerging mass market for printed material (illustrated magazines, daily newspapers, multi-volume novels), all of which interacted in various ways.49
Representations of the urban poor had been popular since before the Victorian print explosion but from the 1830s in particular, âjournalists, painters, illustrators and photographers penetrated urban areas that they found full of unknown phenomena, strong contrasts and shocking experiencesâ.50 With their first-hand reportages, detailed illustrations, realist paintings and shocking photographs, â[t]hey catered to the public of the new (urban) mediaâ.51 From the 1880s, attempts at systematic classification of poverty and early sociological enquiries were conducted by Charles Booth (Life and Labour of the People in London, 17 volumes, 1889â1902) and Seebohm Rowntree (Poverty: A Study of Town Life, 1901), who introduced the concept of the poverty line and showed that almost one third of Londoners and 30 per cent of the inhabitants of York lived in poverty.52 As historian Seth Koven has pointed out the term poor âspanned a considerable spectrum from the homeless to sweated workers [...] to seasonally employed unskilled laborers to regularly employed skilled artisansâ.53 And as historians Andreas Gestrich, Steven King and Lutz Raphael state, Victorian attitudes towards poverty, state welfare and charity were likewise situated on...