Insights on Luke

Charles R. Swindoll

• Publisher: Tyndale House Publishers
• Year: 2017
• Print ISBN: 9781414393803
• eBook ISBN: 9781496410658

Join Chuck as he explores Dr. Luke's carefully researched and strikingly human account of the life of Jesus. Luke describes the man, Jesus, and His ministry in vivid detail. He shows that Jesus is the perfect God-man, the all-powerful Creator who became human to save all of humanity, Jew and Gentile alike.

The 15-volume Swindoll's Living Insights New Testament Commentary series draws on Gold Medallion Award–winner Chuck Swindoll's 50 years of experience with studying and preaching God's Word. His deep insight, signature easygoing style, and humor bring a warmth and practical accessibility not often found in commentaries.

Each volume combines verse-by-verse commentary, charts, maps, photos, key terms, and background articles with practical application. The newly updated volumes now include parallel presentations of the NLT and NASB before each section. This series is a must-have for pastors, teachers, and anyone else who is seeking a deeply practical resource for exploring God's Word.

LUKE’S PREFACE (LUKE 1:1-4)

Each of the four inspired Gospels—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—begins in a unique way. Matthew starts with a genealogy tracing the legal descent of Jesus from Abraham to Joseph, highlighting His place as heir of the Abrahamic promise and the Davidic kingship (Matt. 1:1-17). After a brief quote of an Old Testament prophecy, the Gospel of Mark drops the reader right in the middle of the action of John the Baptizer’s ministry . . . leading to Jesus’ baptism . . . flashing through His temptation in the wilderness . . . and cutting straight to His preaching in Galilee (Mark 1:1-14). John’s Gospel begins with a theologically rich “Christology from above”—a kind of hymn to the eternal Word of God, Himself God, who became man for us. Reminiscent of the powerful opening of Genesis 1, John’s bold confession of the person of Christ booms and echoes like a thundering voice from on high: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1-18).

Unlike the other three accounts of Jesus’ life and ministry, the Gospel of Luke kicks off not with a genealogy, an action sequence, or a piece of powerful prose; it begins instead with something like a sticky note. The opening verses read like a “transmittal letter,” dedicating the following account to “most excellent Theophilus” (Luke 1:3). In this very brief preface, however, we not only learn the name of the first reader of the Gospel, but we also catch a glimpse of the standards of excellence for which the writer, Luke, strived in his research and writing of the account. Before stepping into the narrative in 1:5, let’s take time to explore the kind of excellence Luke sought in His presentation of Jesus Christ in all His splendor.

ONLY THE BEST

LUKE 1:1-4

NASB

1 Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile an account of the things [a]accomplished among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning [a]were eyewitnesses and [b]servants of the [c]word, 3 it seemed fitting for me as well, having [a]investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in consecutive order, most excellent Theophilus; 4 so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been [a]taught.

1:1 [a]Or on which there is full conviction 1:2 [a]Lit became [b]Or ministers [c]I.e. gospel 1:3 [a]Or followed 1:4 [a]Or orally instructed in

NLT

1 Many people have set out to write accounts about the events that have been fulfilled among us. 2 They used the eyewitness reports circulating among us from the early disciples.[*] 3 Having carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I also have decided to write an accurate account for you, most honorable Theophilus, 4 so you can be certain of the truth of everything you were taught.

[1:2] Greek from those who from the beginning were servants of the word.

---

How seldom we find true excellence. We live in an increasingly hurried and hassled society in which fewer people must generate greater output with fewer resources. The constant push for quick turnaround and instant gratification has dulled our senses and lowered our expectations. We have come to accept—and even expect—mediocrity on the job, in the marketplace, and in government. “First-rate” used to be our minimum standard; now, it is considered rude or unreasonable to ask for excellence.

Quality can’t be rushed. Unfortunately, we’re all in a hurry. And the consequences of slouching standards and slipshod work can be disastrous, even with seemingly insignificant tasks. As John Gardner wisely stated in his book Excellence, “The society that scorns excellence in plumbing because plumbing is a humble activity and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because it is an exalted activity will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy. Neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water.”[6] Tragically, his words have proven prophetic: the cancer of mediocrity has invaded Christendom. Fewer seminaries now expect anything beyond a cursory familiarity with the original languages, and more students preparing for ministry opt for degrees with no Greek or Hebrew required. Most graduate programs compress systematic theology to fit into one or two semesters; so, with neither comprehension of orthodox doctrine nor the skills to think through the issues, we shouldn’t be surprised when Christian seminaries cease to be distinctly Christian. In recent years, a prominent Methodist seminary has added clerical training for Muslims and Jews to its curriculum to become “the first truly multi-faith American seminary.”[7] They also plan to add clerical training for Buddhists and Hindus.

This formerly Christian seminary did not change its stripes suddenly. The decision to abandon the “things [they] had been taught” (1:4) began with a small yet momentous compromise in their view of divine truth and its source. This undoubtedly followed a host of tiny compromises in both hermeneutics and theology. The journey toward irrelevance began with a decision to give mediocrity a passing grade.

The downward drag of mediocrity is not a new phenomenon. While traveling with Paul, Luke saw communities of believers scattered across the Roman Empire like a great number of pearls, each growing around its own core of oral tradition. As an educated man, Luke foresaw a particular danger looming on the horizon. As first-generation witnesses began to pass away, leaving fewer firsthand accounts of the Lord and His teaching, myths and fables would take the place of authentic stories. If the churches were to survive this erosion, they would need a unified, comprehensive story of Christ to bind them together. They needed a copiously researched and ruthlessly verified account that would equip them to separate truth from fiction and to remain distinctly Christian. They needed an excellent Gospel.

When the Holy Spirit compelled Luke to write, He drew upon Luke’s affinity for meticulous accuracy. Luke’s extraordinary devotion to excellence took four distinct forms:

Excellence in Research

Excellence in Organization

Excellence in Expression

Excellence in Discipline

— 1:1-2 —

Excellence in research. During Luke’s travels with Paul, he encountered a patchwork of oral traditions preserved in the memories of aging saints who knew Jesus personally. Many had likely written informal memories on scraps of parchment and papyrus. As he traveled with Paul, gathering these scraps of written tradition and perhaps recording his own interviews with eyewitnesses, Luke felt the Holy Spirit’s prompting to write a more excellent account.

He did not merely paste the pieces together to form a composite document. Luke scrupulously checked his facts. The Greek term translated “eyewitnesses” (1:2) derives from the term we transliterate “autopsy” and is not found anywhere else in the Bible—neither the Greek translation of the Old Testament nor the New Testament. It is a term used often, however, by historians such as Josephus, Herodotus, and Polybius. In ancient cultures, no evidence carried more weight than the testimony of a reputable eyewitness.

Luke interviewed the people who knew Jesus best. He spent time with the people who saw Him eat, heard Him snore, and inhaled His odor on a hot afternoon. They had been present when His ministry unfolded. A few had marveled at His transfiguration. They had witnessed His agony in Gethsemane, His writhing under the torturous scourge, and His torment on the cross. And they thrilled to see Him alive again. Luke diligently scrutinized his sources to weed out specious material, fill in missing details, correct errors, and even disclose previously unknown events. And only then, when he had assembled and vetted all the material he could find, did he begin to write.

— 1:3 —

Excellence in organization. A good historian does not merely assemble facts and then string them together. A good historian tells a story, usually for a specific purpose. He or she must choose which information to include and what data to leave out. Then the historian must organize and arrange the facts to paint an accurate, compelling, memorable, and useful picture of what occurred.

The term rendered “investigated” literally means “to follow along” or “to accompany.” In addition to the important task of checking the details, Luke traced the story of Jesus from the beginning to its conclusion to see the mission and work of Christ as a whole. Only when viewing the total can one begin to appreciate the wonder of it all.

The phrase rendered “in consecutive order” (NASB) could be misleading. Luke did not do away with chronological order altogether in his history of Jesus, but he didn’t use it as his main organizing principle either. A better translation might be “in an orderly sequence” (cf. the renderings in the NLT, NIV, and ESV). Ancient people did not obsess over time like we do today. Luke’s overarching arrangement of the individual episodes of the Lord’s life follows a geographical sequence, which ancient readers would have accepted without question.

Excellence in expression. Throughout the narrative, Luke’s grammar and syntax compares very favorably with the best examples of Greek literature in his day. Moreover, his storytelling ability is nothing short of genius. He employed several marvelously sophisticated literary devices, not only to inform his reading (and listening) audiences, but also to occasionally entertain them.

Luke could have presented the facts—and only the tedious facts—in chronological order; instead, he crafted a compelling narrative that conveys the beauty, irony, complexity, excitement, and pathos of God coming to earth to save the world from sin. And it’s a good thing he did. As my mentor, Howard Hendricks, often said to his teachers-in-training: “It’s a sin to make the Bible seem boring!”

— 1:4 —

Excellence in discipline. Despite Luke’s careful attention to detail and his artful use of language, he never lost sight of his primary purpose: “so that you (Theophilus [and those for whom this history was commissioned]) may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught.” Luke’s travels with Paul impressed upon him the perilous future that Christianity would face without an excellent record—an infallible, inerrant, wholly trustworthy account—of the Lord’s life, teachings, and work. He understood that sound theology, like a house, must stand upon the solid rock of truth (cf. 6:46-49). Without an accurate and reliable account of what Jesus taught and what He did on our behalf, believers have no basis for their beliefs. After all, faith separated from divine truth will shift with the prevailing winds of popular opinion and collapse when battered by the storms of adversity.

To make matters worse, Theophilus and all these “God-lovers” lived during a time when the beginnings of a movement known as Gnosticism threatened to warp Christian doctrine just as it had begun to distort Judaism, pagan religions, and even Greek philosophy. Those who knew Christ personally and had witnessed His resurrection would soon die, and with them, firsthand knowledge of Christian truth would cease. Any vacuum of information left after their passing would soon be filled with myths and fables.

Sure enough, it was not long after the production of John, the last of our four Gospels, that Gnostic writings telling bizarre stories about Jesus began to circulate. This occurred as early as the second century. Fortunately, Luke had prepared an excellent history of Jesus and the chu...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Title Page
• Copyright
• Contents
• Author’s Preface
• The Strong’s Numbering System
• Insights on Luke
• Luke: Introduction
• Luke’s Preface (Luke 1:1-4)
• Announced and Appearing (Luke 1:5–4:13)
• Ministering and Serving (Luke 4:14–9:50)
• Instructing and Submitting (Luke 9:51–19:27)
• Conquering and Commissioning (Luke 19:28–24:53)
• Notes