INSIGHTS ON MATTHEW 1ā15
Though God may not show up exactly the way weāre expecting or through the means we think He should, God does show up. Matthewās Gospel not only reveals that Jesus is the King, Israelās long-awaited Messiah, but it also reminds us that Jesus is our ImmanuelĀ āāGod with usāĀ ānow resurrected and ascended, yet with us still, even to the end of the age.
MATTHEW: INTRODUCTION
The backgrounds of the four Gospel writers present a fascinating study in contrasts. John Mark had likely been a teenage hanger-on accompanying the disciples. He may have been the young man who fled the scene of Jesusā arrest in an embarrassing fashion (Mark 14:51-52).[1] Then, after a shaky start in ministry with Paul and his own cousin, Barnabas (Acts 12:25ā13:13; 15:36-41; see Col. 4:10), Mark went on to become a faithful assistant to the apostle Peter (1 Pet. 5:13), ultimately penning what was probably the earliest written Gospel, based on Peterās firsthand testimony.
Luke, on the other hand, was a physician (Col. 4:14). As a well-educated Gentile skilled in Greek, Luke applied his meticulous, critical mind to collecting, verifying, and arranging information so as to write a careful, orderly account of the life of Christ (Luke 1:1-4). Then he wrote a sequel recounting the earliest decades of the church, partly based on his own firsthand participation in ministry (Acts 1:1-2).
John, the ādisciple whom Jesus lovedā (John 20:2), started out as a young fisherman willing to cast off the entanglements of fishing nets and become a fisher of men (Matt. 4:18-22). By the time John penned his Gospel around AD 97, he not only likely had access to the other three Gospels but also had had a lifetime to reflect on the deep theological truths concerning who Jesus was and what that really meant.
This brings us to Matthew. Not a blue-collar fisherman like John. Not a sophisticated, white-collar physician like Luke. And not a young hanger-on like Mark. Matthew had been a tax collector.
A TAX COLLECTOR!
Itās hard for us to picture what that meant to a first-century Jewish audience. Banish from your mind the image of a well-dressed IRS auditor just doing their job to keep taxpayers honest, or a matter-of-fact customs officer reviewing goods to make sure nobody exceeds duty-free limits. Matthew was not some hourly cashier collecting coins for local officials. The Greek term telÅnÄs [5057], translated ātax collector,ā is used quite negatively in the New Testament āoften associated with such terms as āsinnersā and āprostitutes.ā[2] Involved in the collection of money for an oppressive government, tax collectors were regarded as unpatriotic . . . and they were known to engage in extortion for personal gain.[3] If we picture a low-ranking mobster fleecing honest, hardworking citizens for a local cartel, we probably wouldnāt be far from the truth. Michael Green notes that tax collectors, known in Latin as publicani, āwere much hated as social pariahs, and the Jews classed them with murderers. They were not even tolerated in the synagogues.ā[4]
Who else but God would choose a hated, greedy tax collector not only to become one of Jesusā twelve disciples but also to pen what would become the first book of the New Testament canon? What a surprising example of the mercy and grace of God! When the presumably dishonest tax collector named Levi (Matthew) met the Lord Jesus and recognized Him as the long-awaited King of Israel, everything changed. His whole life would now be about proclaiming the Messiah to his fellow Jews āboth through his living testimony and through his written words. I love what one man writes about Matthew: āWhen Jesus called Matthew, as he sat in the office where he collected the customs duty, Matthew rose up and followed him and left everything behind him except one thing āhis pen.ā[5]
MATTHEW AMONG THE FOUR GOSPELS
God chose to reveal the life, works, teachings, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ through four written accounts āthose of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Why four Gospels? Why not just one? Or seven? Because God has seen fit to reveal Himself in this way. His Spirit has told us the pivotal story of Jesus, the God-man, through the eyes of four unique writers with four distinct but complementary perspectives. The following chart summarizes these four Gospels, demonstrating the various contributions of their writers.
COMPARISON OF THE FOUR GOSPELS
- Portrait of Jesus
- Matthew: Promised King
- Mark: Suffering Servant
- Luke: Perfect Man
- John: God the Son
- Original Audience
- Matthew: Jews
- Mark: Romans
- Luke: Greeks
- John: The World
- Author
- Matthew: Tax collector, one of the twelve disciples
- Mark: Close associate of and assistant to the disciples
- Luke: Gentile physician, early convert
- John: Fisherman, one of the twelve disciples
- Theme
- Matthew: The messianic King has come, fulfilling Old Testament promises.
- Mark: The Son of God has come to seek, to serve, and to save.
- Luke: The Son of Man has come to redeem all of humanity.
- John: The eternal Son of God has become incarnate.
- Response
- Matthew: Worship Him!
- Mark: Follow Him!
- Luke: Imitate Him!
- John: Believe in Him!
Though all four Gospel accounts together harmoniously present the good news of the person and work of Jesus Christ in His first coming, Matthew, Mark, and Luke relate to each other in a unique way. These three are called āsynopticā Gospels, from a Greek term meaning āseeing together.ā In many places these first three Gospels can be read side by side, giving distinct but complementary accounts of events that, when āseen together,ā provide a fuller picture of what Jesus said and did. In contrast, the apostle Johnās account, written several decades after the synoptic Gospels were composed, covers elements from Johnās own eyewitness testimony that the preceding Gospels donāt treat.
Though the synoptic Gospels present the life of Christ in...