HEREâS TO THE CRAZY ONES
Blessed are the weird people . . .
Poets, misfits, writers, mystics, heretics,
Painters, and troubadours . . .
For they teach us to see the world through different eyes.
JACOB NORDBY
In 1997, Apple launched its now-iconic âThink Differentâ advertising campaign, featuring black-and-white footage of groundbreakers like Albert Einstein, Bob Dylan, Martin Luther King, John Lennon, Mahatma Gandhi, Pablo Picasso, and others, and voiced by actor Richard Dreyfuss, intoning, âHereâs to the crazy ones.â
To this day, thereâs debate about who actually wrote the copy for the âThink Differentâ commercial.[1] Most agree it was largely the work of Rob Siltanen, a creative director and a managing partner of the ad agency that produced it. But like all ad campaigns, it was a collaboration that included contributions by Steve Jobs himself and various members of the team from the agency. In any case, the âThink Differentâ voiceover is one of the truly great pieces of advertising copy ever written:
You can hear a hint of Robert Frost and Jack Kerouac and even a touch of Kurt Vonnegut in the cadence of the language. But thatâs not the only reason why itâs so good. It works because it resonates so strongly with us all. Everyone who appears in the âThink Differentâ campaign really did epitomize the spirit of the campaign. They broke the rules, they were vilified, but they changed stuff. Dylan, Lennon, Gandhi, Ali, and King all drove their contemporaries around the bend. But looking back, we now view them as groundbreakers who left the world a better place. We all know itâs true that crazy people change the world.
So hereâs my question: Why isnât there a bit more crazy in Christianity these days? And I donât mean crazy as in zany or juvenile (thereâs plenty of that!). I mean crazy as in Picasso, Jim Henson, Martha Graham, and Cesar Chavez. I mean crazy as in round pegs in square holes. Could it be that the church has closed its doors to the misfits and rebels and troublemakers? Does the church make space for and foster the contributions of those who see things differently? If Steve Jobs was right and the world is pushed forward by people who break the rules and have no respect for the status quo, what does that say about the churchâs vision to change the world?
ECCENTRIC CHRISTIANS
Not that itâs always been this way. In fact, the church has produced these âcrazy onesâ in the past (MLK being a case in point), and while their contemporaries might have viewed them askance, they are widely regarded as those who pushed the cause of Christ forward.
St. Boniface was an eighth-century Scottish missionary to Germany who became frustrated with the Germanic pagansâ devotion to a sacred oak tree worshiped to honor Thor. The Germans feared that to even touch the tree would bring down the wrath of the gods. So Boniface took an axe to the oak, and having felled it, used the wood to build a church at the site dedicated to St. Peter. Thatâs pretty crazy.
Francis Xavier, one of the craziest evangelists in history, having established Christianity in western India and the East Indies, met a samurai warrior named AnjirĹ in Malacca in 1547. AnjirĹ was on the run from the Japanese authorities, having killed a man there. Francis shared the message of Christâs forgiveness with AnjirĹ, who accepted Christianity and decided to return to Japan to face the music. But he also begged Francis to accompany him and to bring the gospel to his homeland. Remember, this was 1547! Francis had already traveled from his native Portugal to India to modern-day Indonesia. Asking him to go to Japan may well have been like inviting us to the moon. But he agreed, and became the first Christian missionary to the closed kingdom.
Or thereâs the exotically named Count Nikolaus von Zinzendorf, who virtually relinquished his highborn status to join a band of traveling asylum seekers from Moravia and Bohemia (the Czech Republic today) who had camped on his estate in Germany in 1722. The Moravians were a disorderly bunch, but nonetheless, the temporary village they created on Zinzendorfâs estate soon became a refuge of religious freedom that attracted persecuted Christians from across Europe. But these people were persecuted because of their passionately held views, so as Zinzendorfâs model village swelled with fanatics from differing perspectives, things got very rowdy. Differing factions charged each other with heresy, and their leaders accused each other of being false prophets. Things heated up when these leaders started trading apocalyptic visions at a hundred paces. The village fell into disarray and serious conflict.
Most of Europeâs landed gentry, when faced with a disorderly mob camped out on their estate, would have simply and quickly evicted them and been done with it. But not Zinzendorf. He joined them!
He pretty much left his castle to live in the Moravian village, to pray and minister to each family, and to call on them to live together in love. Thatâs just plain weird. But weirder still is the fact that God chose to use this strange community of refugees to ignite the modern missions movement. On August 13, 1727, the Holy Spirit descended on the village, bestowing what Zinzendorf later called âa sense of the nearness of Christ.â[3] All their differences were blown away and this unlikely community became an extraordinary global missionary force.
I could go on. I could mention Anne Hutchinson from the Massachusetts Bay Colony, who was described as âa woman of a haughty and fierce carriage, of a nimble wit and active spirit, and a very voluble tongue, more bold than a man,â[4] whose crime âaccording to Americaâs founding fathers âwas usurping male authority. She was banished from the colony for her eccentricity.
Or Mother Ann Lee, the founder of the Shaker movement, whose views on equality between the sexes and her then-bizarre practice of speaking in multiple heavenly languages and worshiping by ecstatic dancing or âshakingâ (hence the name) led to her being beaten regularly by mobs in England, and later, Massachusetts.
Or the fiery John Brown stirring up ferment against slavery in Kansas.
Or the hermit architect and devout Christian Antoni GaudĂ designing the most curious buildings in Europe.
Or Albert Schweitzer madly playing Bach and Mendelssohn on his pedal piano in the Congolese jungle.
Or Stanley Jones hanging out with Mahatma Gandhi in his purpose-built Christian ashram in India.
Or Aimee Semple McPherson hamming it up in her extravagant set pieces every Sunday at Angelus Temple in Los Angeles (and even getting âkidnappedâ to Mexico, but thatâs another story).
Or Arthur Blessitt, who started carrying a huge wooden cross around America in the 1960s and who has gone on to drag it faithfully all over the world (including over 300 countries and Antarctica).
They were the crazy ones. Round pegs in square holes.
And it feels as if there are fewer and fewer of them these days.
But before we imagine Christian eccentricity is the domain of just a few outstanding personalities, allow me to try to make a case for why all Christians should be eccentric.
The word eccentric comes from a combination of the Greek terms ex (out of) and kentron (center). When combined, ekkentros means âout of center.â The term gained currency in the late Middle Ages, when astronomers like Copernicus dared to suggest that the earth was not at the center of the solar system. By claiming the earth in fact orbited the sun, Copernicus became the original eccentric.
Enter Richard Beck, a professor from Abilene Christian University, who pushes the definition of eccentricity a bit further. In his book The Slavery of Death, Beck takes its literal meaning (âout of centerâ) and suggests that an eccentric identity is an identity where the focal point of the self is shifted to God. He says, âThe ego, in a kind of Copernican Revolution, is displaced from the center and moved to the periphery. The self is displaced being the âcenter of the universeâ so that it may orbit God.â[5]
In other words, all Christians who have made God the center and focus of their lives can rightly be called eccentric.
The alternative, Beck says, is what Martin Luther called incurvatus in se, the self âcurved inwardâ upon itself, with the ego at the center of our identity. âIncurvatus in se suggests that human sinfulness is rooted in self-focus, self-absorption, and self-worship.â[6] Itâs me at the center. A true conversion to Christ involves displacing me and becoming truly âoff center.â
Now, of course, thatâs not how we usually use the term eccentric. When we think of people who are âoff center,â the center we have in mind is usually some cultural or behavioral norm. So eccentric people are those who act in a socially unorthodox fashion. Theyâre strange, unusual, sometimes deviant. But Beck is trying to rehabilitate the term, to drive us back to its original meaning and to suggest eccentricity should not only be expressed in zany behavior but also in truly biblical Christianity. When we put God at the center of our identity and push our egos out to the edge, we will become a different kind of people. He says,
In my previous book Surprise the World, I make the case that the early church eventually usurped and conquered the Roman world by living such a sublimely alternative lifestyle that they attracted thousands of people bowed and broken by the cruelty of life under Caesar. These Christians were a peculiar people. Or, as I pointed out in that book, they lived âquestionable lives.â[8]
Today, the church in America seems to have traded in its mandate to be eccentric and aimed instead at an unconscious conventionality. Rural norms are too quaint, urban norms too dangerous, so the church finds a happy medium in a suburban spirituality. Itâs impolite to think of ourselves as rich and demoralizing to think of ourselves as poor, so we find a happy medium in the middle class. We are happy. We are medium. We fit in. And very often we baptize that conventionality by suggesting that God is primarily concerned with order, and with us living peaceably with our neighbors. Iâm certainly not suggesting we shouldnât be peaceable, but neither should we be indistinguishable from our fine, upstanding non-Christian neighbors.
Weâre the âoff centerâ ones. Or, at least, we should be.
THE ECCENTRIC GOD
If Richard Beckâs more psychological argument about displacing the ego and orbiting our identity around God isnât convincing enough (he is a professor of psychology, after all), he also offers a handy theological basis for eccentricity as well: God is eccentric.
Yep, we have an eccentric God. Think about it. While many religions see their deities being intrinsically bound up in creation, the biblical God is âoff center.â The God of the Bible is separate from the created world. Certainly, God is involved in the created world. God draws close to his people. Heâs described as sustaining the universe and involving himself in human affairs. And he is revealed to us most clearly as the enfleshed Messiah, Jesus. All that is true.
But orthodox Christianity teaches that the triune God remains wholly Other, separate from the universe he has created. Beck puts it this way: